Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

 
Last edited:
it’s a slippery slope- first you acknowledge the damage they cause, next thing you’ll want to avoid the damage they cause, next thing you know you’ll remove them completely
That sounds about fair .

I would be curious too if it could be legally used against you said person loses a lot of money at Windy Hill, you've got an official statement saying pokies cause issue but you continue to offer said pokies.


I am for getting rid of them but maybe don't know the overall effect removing them has yes we aren't making money from them but they are just moved onto someone else.


For sure I would like us to get the the point we can sell/remove then and have other revenue sources and think maybe we need to be more active there than we have been
 
That sounds about fair .

I would be curious too if it could be legally used against you said person loses a lot of money at Windy Hill, you've got an official statement saying pokies cause issue but you continue to offer said pokies.


I am for getting rid of them but maybe don't know the overall effect removing them has yes we aren't making money from them but they are just moved onto someone else.


For sure I would like us to get the the point we can sell/remove then and have other revenue sources and think maybe we need to be more active there than we have been
it would be pretty daft to have in the constitution that statement whilst also profiting from them.

i’m still gutted and stunned that the eSports team didn’t bring in enough profits to remove the pokies
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I think Barham has intimated that there could be potential legal ramifications from including that in the constitution. I am for the removal of any reliance/use of pokies, but have to say the idea of inserting something into the constitution that is largely symbolic and may open the club up to legal issues might not be a particularly useful tactic.
 
I think Essendon should stop stealing money from its supporters by dangling the impossibly tiny chance of winning big in front of them. I also think we should get rid of the pokies.
Agreed! And maybe we can even find other revenue generators like winning premierships and finals and having superstar players & stuff 😊
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Also wouldn’t millennials have been little more than children in 2007? Dunno how they end up being responsible for Sheedy not being allowed to leave coaching on his terms
I’m still getting my head around the use of the Southern American ‘y’all’ which grates on me. Sorry Agro, it does my head in.
 
Also wouldn’t millennials have been little more than children in 2007? Dunno how they end up being responsible for Sheedy not being allowed to leave coaching on his terms

According to Wikipedia millennials are ~ 1981 - 1996. So the oldest would have been 26, youngest 11. Obviously a very influential demographic there.
 
Any y'all milenials ever think the last 17 years would have been any worse if you had have just let Sheeds finish coaching us on his terms?
Not a millennial but yes it could have been worse. Sheedy did not even know all the players on the list in the last few years and was too distracted by the red wines and his horses.
 
Any y'all milenials ever think the last 17 years would have been any worse if you had have just let Sheeds finish coaching us on his terms?
A more interesting question perhaps is which coach would've made the most difference over the last 20+ years? Is there anyone we could've brought in that would've had a profound positive effect compared to the coaches we've had?

For example, if Leigh Matthews had coached us instead of coaching Brisbane, would we have won more premierships in the early 2000s? Or if Bomber Thompson had coached us instead of Geelong would we have had more success?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Club Mgmt. Board of Directors as led by President Dave Barham

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top