Game Boncers Tribute Werewolf

[Pie 4 Life]

That also isn't directed at Marc, I'm saying in general.

 

[Proper Gander]

I find at this stage of the game the ones who suck up the most to known good are the ones who have the most to lose.

And you seem to be getting kind of helpful and cosy

 

[Pie 4 Life]

And you seem to be getting kind of helpful and cosy

Lol, I've been the most against MWPP's plays the last two days (bar Tarks this morning), and been vocal about it.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

And you took the risk night one then? I’m a little surprised, you would be amongst the likely candidates for a pop early.

I always do when I have a protective role. You of all people should know this given how I played JOAT in your recent game.

I like to have options once I know the lay of the land. If I get struck night one when the probability of being killed is at its most remote (at least of the early phases) so be it. The vig also couldn’t kill me this game so I had one less variable to navigate.

 

[MWPP]

Lol, I've been the most against MWPP's plays the last two days (bar Tarks this morning), and been vocal about it.

I don't recall you objecting to the IMS play at all...
Happy to be proven wrong if you find the post. I may well have missed it.

 

[Proper Gander]

I always do when I have a protective role. You of all people should know this given how I played JOAT in your recent game.

I like to have options once I know the lay of the land. If I get struck night one when the probability of being killed is at its most remote (at least of the early phases) so be it. The vig also couldn’t kill me this game so I had one less variable to navigate.

That’s not unreasonable.

That’s what I do, more because I’m daft now.

As for any recent game, was there a game? I don’t recall? Seem to have stuck a blank.

Also JOAT and Doc are a bit different. I would seer every time N1, but this might also be because I’m daft

 

[MWPP]

I always do when I have a protective role. You of all people should know this given how I played JOAT in your recent game.

I like to have options once I know the lay of the land. If I get struck night one when the probability of being killed is at its most remote (at least of the early phases) so be it. The vig also couldn’t kill me this game so I had one less variable to navigate.

Game - Boncers Tribute Werewolf

AUR’s absence on the list suggests you’re in the camp who believes he was framed ? AUR is TJASTA arrr

www.bigfooty.com

You specified that your position would be precarious that night if you didn't get the amulet. Which implied that you did in fact protect N1.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

That’s not unreasonable.

That’s what I do, more because I’m daft now.

As for any recent game, was there a game? I don’t recall? Seem to have stuck a blank.

Also JOAT and Doc are a bit different. I would seer every time N1, but this might also be because I’m daft

Of course. No game at all. I must’ve dreamed that one. My apologies

 

[Pie 4 Life]

I don't recall you objecting to the IMS play at all...
Happy to be proven wrong if you find the post. I may well have missed it.

I voted for AUR in a crap shoot (sure wrong, but with no info and was playing strangely as the vig even admitted). Yesterday while you were busy lynching a villager I went for wiz against the grain. Today I agreed Tarks is a good shot, but also said jmoo should be the main consideration.

 

[Proper Gander]

Lol, I've been the most against MWPP's plays the last two days (bar Tarks this morning), and been vocal about it.

Quite (don’t recall this but I don’t recall otherwise)

But you did say sucking up was important for “this stage of the game”

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Game - Boncers Tribute Werewolf

AUR’s absence on the list suggests you’re in the camp who believes he was framed ? AUR is TJASTA arrr

www.bigfooty.com

You specified that your position would be precarious that night if you didn't get the amulet. Which implied that you did in fact protect N1.

I’m not surprised you’d draw that conclusion given you always protect night one.

I’m borrowing from Zerg who beat me to requesting the amulet in a recent game and left me as JOAT exposed. Of course I wasn’t going to signpost at that point what I had or hadn’t done with my protects.

 

[MWPP]

I voted for AUR in a crap shoot (sure wrong, but with no info and was playing strangely as the vig even admitted). Yesterday while you were busy lynching a villager I went for wiz against the grain. Today I agreed Tarks is a good shot, but also said jmoo should be the main consideration.

So I don't see how d1 was 'vocally against' .
And yep , you were wrong d1 and I was wrong d2

 

[Proper Gander]

I voted for AUR in a crap shoot (sure wrong, but with no info and was playing strangely as the vig even admitted). Yesterday while you were busy lynching a villager I went for wiz against the grain. Today I agreed Tarks is a good shot, but also said jmoo should be the main consideration.

Against the grain isn’t a bad play for evil though. You tend to escape scrutiny as “who was involved in the lynch” the following day

 

[Pie 4 Life]

So I don't see how d1 was 'vocally against' .
And yep , you were wrong d1 and I was wrong d2

That was yesterday I was "vocally against". I questioned it during the lynch which you know. I was also largely absent on Friday due to the karaoke/dinner that everyone had a good laugh at, where yesterday I was around.

 

[Proper Gander]

I’m not surprised you’d draw that conclusion given you always protect night one.

I’m borrowing from Zerg who beat me to requesting the amulet in a recent game and left me as JOAT exposed. Of course I wasn’t going to signpost at that point what I had or hadn’t done with my protects.

So you didn’t protect night 1 because of Zerg. I’m guessing night one then is your usual strategy?

 

[MWPP]

I’m not surprised you’d draw that conclusion given you always protect night one.

I’m borrowing from Zerg who beat me to requesting the amulet in a recent game and left me as JOAT exposed. Of course I wasn’t going to signpost at that point what I had or hadn’t done with my protects.

Indeed. The combination of not protecting night one and then claiming makes little sense to me.

But in reality it's the ignoring of the blackmail and leaving dank open as a result that makes me most suspicious of you

Which game was that? I assume it's one I never played as I haven't seen Zerg be good bar last game
Unless you mean you're borrowing how he requested the amulet as evil, which seems like an out of proportion slipup

 

[DemurePrincess]

stuff all this. Here is my ravioli

View attachment 2211866

Omg! What perfect little morsels!

Will that go with my jam?

 

[Proper Gander]

Indeed. The combination of not protecting night one and then claiming makes little sense to me.

But in reality it's the ignoring of the blackmail and leaving dank open as a result that makes me most suspicious of you

Which game was that? I assume it's one I never played as I haven't seen Zerg be good bar last game
Unless you mean you're borrowing how he requested the amulet as evil, which seems like an out of proportion slipup

 

[Proper Gander]

Omg! What perfect little morsels!

Will that go with my jam?

View attachment 2211875

We can but try

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Against the grain isn’t a bad play for evil though. You tend to escape scrutiny as “who was involved in the lynch” the following day

Haha find me a game of late where I haven't "escaped scrutiny" for farting in the wrong direction.

I'm always active regardless of role, including villager.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Omg! What perfect little morsels!

Will that go with my jam?

View attachment 2211875

That picture is quite small, any chance of enlarging it?

 

[Cadsky]

MWPP reckons he's not mafia though. If he's not mafia, then his "faction" is just himself.

Seems like a very silly play to claim doc if he's playing his own role. I guess he could be Alpha or SK and was trying to cover his tracks but delivered it poorly.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

So you didn’t protect night 1 because of Zerg. I’m guessing night one then is your usual strategy?

That’s not what I said at all. Are you deliberately being obtuse?

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Seems like a very silly play to claim doc if he's playing his own role. I guess he could be Alpha or SK and was trying to cover his tracks but delivered it poorly.

Yeah that's why I'm more inclined to think he's the doc. But again, I don't know what MM thinks most of the time.

 

[Proper Gander]

Omg! What perfect little morsels!

Will that go with my jam?

View attachment 2211875

We can but try

That’s not what I said at all. Are you deliberately being obtuse?

No. Just asking questions. You never know - you might go full Emu and take the decision out of my hands. That and I’m not confident I would get anywhere asking Marc questions