- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,286
- 58,431
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Top 4:
GWS
Bulldogs
Demons
Saints
Bottom 4:
Tigers
Kangaroos
Port Adelaide
Collingwood
GWS
Bulldogs
Demons
Saints
Bottom 4:
Tigers
Kangaroos
Port Adelaide
Collingwood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
A bit harsh on port and the pies. As for us, I'm almost willing to bet my account that we won't finish bottom 4.Top 4:
GWS
Bulldogs
Demons
Saints
Bottom 4:
Tigers
Kangaroos
Port Adelaide
Collingwood
Think you are getting a bit carried away there. Not saying that there won't be improvement by some of those teams but think trading has changed things a fair bit which means a team like say Hawthorn will be thereabouts. Successful teams over a number of years most times seem to be able to attract players on the move. I'm just usung Hawthorn as an example of course!Top 4:
GWS
St. Kilda
Bulldogs
Melbourne
Bottom 4:
Richmond
Collingwood
Geelong
Hawthorn
Well, I got Sydney and Brisbane. Bit of wishful thinking with Geelong down there thoughAnyway 2016, no particular order
Top 4:
Sydney
Freo
North
Gold Coast
Bottom 4:
GWS (the next Melbourne)
Carlton
Brisbane
Geelong
2016:
Top 4: (1)West Coast, (2)Bulldogs, (3)Hawthorn, (4)Fremantle
Bottom 4: (15) St Kilda (16) Carlton (17) Brisbane (18) Essendon
2017:
Top 4: (1) Bulldogs (2) GWS (3) West Coast (4) Gold Coast
Bottom 4: (15) Brisbane (16) Geelong (17) North Melbourne (18) Essendon
2018
Top 4: (1) GWS (2) Bulldogs (3) Gold Coast (4) Carlton
Bottom 4: (15) Geelong (16) Fremantle (17) Essendon (18) North Melbourne
One year on;
2016: Hawthorn were top 4 before the finals, finished fifth, WBD were 7th but went on to win. West Coast were fifth but finished 7th. Freo no where near it. As for the bottom four, got Essendon and Brisbane spot on, underestimated my Blueboys, but was only out by two spots, and underestemiated St Kilda.
2017: I wouldn't change a lot; besides taking Gold Coast out of the top 4 and putting them into the bottom 4. I'll take Geelong out and replace them with GC. I'll put Sydney in the top 4 in place of GC. Actually Richmond need to be bottom four somewhere, maybe take Essendon out as well
Top 4: (1) GWS (2) WBD (3) Sydney (4) WCE
Bottom 4 (18) Brisbane (17) Richmond (16) GC (15) North
2018: I'll keep roughly the same, I didnt expect Essendon to be rewarded for cheating with Pick #1 so I see them climbing out of the bottom #4. Fremantle won't be bottom 4 but i'll keep North and Geelong in there for now. Richmon will stay, and Brisbane probably arent getting fixed any time soon. As for the top #4, GC wont be there obviously; i'll back the Blues and think Melbourne will be the other side
Top 4: (1) GWS (2) Dogs (3) Melb (4) Carlton
Bottom 4: (18) North (17) Richmond (16) Geelong (15) Brisbane
They definitely could.. they wont because they've done everything to prop that club up during the whole process; but they should haveAFL didn't expect the Wada ban, so prematurely stripped picks from the cheats. They can't really do it again.
They definitely could.. they wont because they've done everything to prop that club up during the whole process; but they should have
2018: I'll keep roughly the same, I didnt expect Essendon to be rewarded for cheating with Pick #1
Mate... you're in for a rude awakening. There is at least a decade in the bottom 10-12 waiting for North Melbourne.In three years, a very hard thing to predict
Top 4:
GWS
Port
Dogs
North (a guy can dream)
Bottom 4:
Geelong
St kilda
West Coast
GCS
Mate... you're in for a rude awakening. There is at least a decade in the bottom 10-12 waiting for North Melbourne.
Like the dogs in 2014 after they sacked their coach and captain walked out? We aren't Carlton - a quick check of the history of the Afl will show you we are 1 team that doesn't stay at the bottom for long.Mate... you're in for a rude awakening. There is at least a decade in the bottom 10-12 waiting for North Melbourne.
I have never understood this line of thinking. The average rebuild is 3-5 years. People who suggest a decade in the doldrums for a team are more hoping than predicting.
The dogs had talented youth, North have???Like the dogs in 2014 after they sacked their coach and captain walked out? We aren't Carlton - a quick check of the history of the Afl will show you we are 1 team that doesn't stay at the bottom for long.
Right - so everyone had them bottom 4 in 2015 - even their own supporters. Yet they turned it around quickly. Lots of decade of pain posts about them as well.The dogs had talented youth, North have???
Teams spend more than 5 years at the bottom because they rebuild once and the rebuild fails, so they need to do another. You can't possibly predict that with any confidence.Except Melbourne and Richmond
Agree - dees finally stopped butchering early draft picks and now on the move. Martin pick 3, Cotchin pick 2 will be 1 & 2 in their B&F this year. Nail your top picks and get lucky with some late gems and things turn quickly.Teams spend more than 5 years at the bottom because they rebuild once and the rebuild fails, so they need to do another. You can't possibly predict that with any confidence.