I walked past Cook at West Lakes yesterday - he's a lot taller than you think. He's listed as 190 cm, but I think he's bigger than that. I wonder if he has grown in recent times? He looks closer to 195 cm I'd say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 12
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Maybe you’ve shrunk?I walked past Cook at West Lakes yesterday - he's a lot taller than you think. He's listed as 190 cm, but I think he's bigger than that. I wonder if he has grown in recent times? He looks closer to 195 cm I'd say.
Can we just put them both on a HFF in a trenchcoat together?Cook's skills and pace combined with McHenry's work rate would be a player.
Mate, we're not the Roosters.Can we just put them both on a HFF in a trenchcoat together?
Maybe you’ve shrunk?
It’s funny that McHenry has everything Cook lacks and Cook has everything McHenry lacks. Cook has a far higher ceiling than McHenry, but time will tell if he plays more AFL games.
exactly Cook is a slow burn project player. Was extremely underdeveloped. Everyone needs to be patient.I see some parrallels with Cook and Fog. Both have the natural talent and footy smarts, maybe just missing the tank/drive at the start of their AFL careers. Hopefully like Fog, Cook can lift another gear and be a regular for us.
I see some parrallels with Cook and Fog. Both have the natural talent and footy smarts, maybe just missing the tank/drive at the start of their AFL careers. Hopefully like Fog, Cook can lift another gear and be a regular for us.
May also to do with confidence in having a body that holds up to rigors of AFL.
Couple of lovely passes by foot - caressed over a defender into a team mates hands.16 disposals, didn't look out of place at all.
Yep, started quietly Q116 disposals, didn't look out of place at all.
He's got a good frame on him compared to someone like Sholl, so he's got the scope to be a bigger wingman. He'll mentally need to add some defensive aggression to his game, I think a lot of it with him will just be experience and some more physical development.Yep, started quietly Q1
A couple of terrible errors in Q2 but also started to find the ball and use it well
Better after half time. Involved in the game and some nice touches.
He has a bit of poise. Can candy around an opponent rather than rushing a disposal under pressure. Can hit a target.
Hopefully he stays in because there is something there.
Needs to be exposed too.He's got a good frame on him compared to someone like Sholl, so he's got the scope to be a bigger wingman. He'll mentally need to add some defensive aggression to his game, I think a lot of it with him will just be experience and some more physical development.
Looked a bit like Dawson out there I thought.He's got a good frame on him compared to someone like Sholl, so he's got the scope to be a bigger wingman. He'll mentally need to add some defensive aggression to his game, I think a lot of it with him will just be experience and some more physical development.
He's got a good frame on him compared to someone like Sholl, so he's got the scope to be a bigger wingman. He'll mentally need to add some defensive aggression to his game, I think a lot of it with him will just be experience and some more physical development.
Good skills, good size and has a bit of x-factor. If he could get a bit of c*** about him he could be anything. Could see his skillset transitioning to centre square mid
This is a harsh call but my gut feel watching him play is that he’s one of those guys who has always had enough talent to get by, and hasn’t learnt how to do the hard stuff.I like his skills and he's no slouch but he makes Milera look like a hard case in comparison. He just looks like a fish out of water every time he has to tackle a bloke. Needs to develop a harder edge.
Neds named on the ball in the SANFL. Cook, Himmelberg and Soligo are the ones not named so sub will be either Cook or Soligo.Dropped after 1 game. Maybe he'll be sub, but suspect it'll be Ned again.
On SM-A115F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I suspect Soligo, but may be Cook.Neds named on the ball in the SANFL. Cook, Himmelberg and Soligo are the ones not named so sub will be either Cook or Soligo.
Yeah, thanks, I just saw that. Glad it's not Neddy.Neds named on the ball in the SANFL. Cook, Himmelberg and Soligo are the ones not named so sub will be either Cook or Soligo.