- Sep 28, 2009
- 23,685
- 33,968
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Reading FC
Swan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Keep hearing this. Who other than Varcoe was best 22 but not playing due to injury?
Fair list but not all there are injuredTravis Varcoe
Travis Cloke
Marley Williams
Tom Langdon
Nathan Brown
Jamie Elliott
Dane Swan
Taylor Adams
Tyson Goldsack
Ben Sinclair
Jackson Ramsay
Jarrod Witts
All best 22/top 25 players, all missing from the side that played Carlton yesterday.
Only one more than the Western Bulldogs, or Carlton who you lost to yesterday...I am sure that makes all the difference.We have the biggest injury list in the comp . Give it a rest.
No more than say the Gold CoastWe have the biggest injury list in the comp . Give it a rest.
Fair list but not all there are injured
Only one more than the Western Bulldogs, or Carlton who you lost to yesterday...I am sure that makes all the difference.
What difference does it make whether the team has progressively gotten worse or not, ladder wise? If anything, the list we have now is what majority of Collingwood fans would rather have than 2015, 2014 or 2013. Whether he is around or not in 2 years time, he has built a foundation for a Collingwood team that can challenge for top 4 in 2017+You keep them there. Buckley has dropped rungs on the ladder every year he has been there. His win record goes, 17,14,11,10,2 (be a big ask to top 10 this year).
Has any other coach in history ever had a team over 5 years that got worse every year? (i don't know the answer to that but I am guessing not)
Cloke and maybe Nathan Brown (depending on whether he's being "managed") are the only ones there not injured.
You won't go from not playing finals in years to top 4 next year. What a ridiculous thought.What difference does it make whether the team has progressively gotten worse or not, ladder wise? If anything, the list we have now is what majority of Collingwood fans would rather have than 2015, 2014 or 2013. Whether he is around or not in 2 years time, he has built a foundation for a Collingwood team that can challenge for top 4 in 2017+
Witts only had his first game back this week and Buckley in all his wisdom decided to drop Brown. Cloke was going to play this week but injured his back. We have a good enough list to make the finals. Not convinced on the coach and we need a fit listFair list but not all there are injured
Langdon, Witts, Sinclair & Ramsey are also not definitire best 22. Plenty of clubs with worse injury list than pies and dont give out the sxcuses we hear every week from Buckley.
Travis Varcoe
Travis Cloke - dropped cos he's become a spud
Marley Williams
Tom Langdon - average player
Nathan Brown - see T Cloke
Jamie Elliott - I'm sure more selfish players is exactly what's missing from the team
Dane Swan - past it
Taylor Adams
Tyson Goldsack - squad player at best
Ben Sinclair - you serious?
Jackson Ramsay - who?
Jarrod Witts - dead set if you have witts as a key out no wonder you're over rating your list
All best 22/top 25 players, all missing from the side that played Carlton yesterday.
So you're missing 3 players from the late starting dynasty. Makes sense why Collingnwood aren't 7-0 with those elite stars not there.
That team was shot by 2011.
This has been done to death, seriously.
The Collingwood list at the moment is the best it has been since prior to our flag. We've got one of the most talented young lists in the comp. He needs to coach and develop them to fufil their potential, he's got until 2017 to do that. If he can't, we bring in someone with a sound game plan that compliments their skill set.
It's quite an overkill with the week to week discussion about Buckley. His game plan at the moment is shyte and does not suit the type of players we've got on the paddock at the moment, it needs to change.
Get Paul Roos?
What difference does it make whether the team has progressively gotten worse or not, ladder wise? If anything, the list we have now is what majority of Collingwood fans would rather have than 2015, 2014 or 2013. Whether he is around or not in 2 years time, he has built a foundation for a Collingwood team that can challenge for top 4 in 2017+
If the coach has completely lost the players and is using a tired game-plan that no one actually has any faith in, as appears to be the case currently, it follows that marginally better players aren't actually going to help much.Whether you rate the players or not is irrelevant. It's their importance to Collingwood in 2016 that matters. If they are better and more experienced than those who are replacing them, assumedly we'd be playing to a better level, or at least have more consistency of effort and performance.
Probably not, but there's a good chance there'll be a few clubs looking for a new coach at the end of the year and if you're going to go down that road anyway...Changing coaches now wouldn't change much for this year IMO
Seem to be. Two arguments going on here, the coach and the playing list
Starting with the coach. I have hated seeing Bucks fail as loved him so much as a player and he does seem a guenuinely good bloke. Still that doesn't matter now, he can't coach, don't think he seems to have the footy IQ to match it with the other coaches. I think it's a terminal problem for him and if he is sacked this week would be the best for all concerned. Appoint a caretaker, put the acid on the playing list, and start the search for the best candidate with enough time to make it comprehensive. Not any experienced coaches out there who stand out so may need to be a rookie. So be it, just look thoroughly.
The playing list, looks more and more as though the list hasn't come on. Certainly appears the least skilful list of the 18 teams. Won't be getting any top end draft picks this year and have little to tradewithso the list will be treading water for 12 months. This probably puts future success and finals the playing career of Pendles or anyone older than him. Leaves Sidebottom and below in age group as the players to build around so need a full rebuild of the list.