Lion of Panjshir
Team Captain
- May 7, 2010
- 310
- 428
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Caro will win a Walkley for her pursuit of Hird. And deservedly so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
my post was in response to a blanket "it passed the legal team because it's true" statement.Ground breaking.
Remember when Barrett said the players will be cleared by next friday like a month ago? you guys all cleared and said "in your face" how is Barretts track Record by the way?
I also recall when Barrett was saying negative things on the subject Essendon supporters were calling him a flog that just spreads rumors next minute hes got positive news and all of the sudden he becomes creditable to Essendon fans.
Please link me Barretts track record on credibility but please don't include the players will be cleared by friday piece.
my post was in response to a blanket "it passed the legal team because it's true" statement.
The rest of your post is rude and presumptuous - don't pass me through some ******* "bomber fan" template, spew shit like "you guys all" at me and then ask leading questions and sardonic "please link me to Barretts (sic) track record" based on my implied involvement.
OK. Agree to disagree. Let's wait and seeNobody's going to sue Caro if she's wrong about Ross Lyon staying at St Kilda. There are much higher stakes here. Fairfax wouldn't publish this unless they had total confidence in it.
Nobody's going to sue Caro if she's wrong about Ross Lyon staying at St Kilda. There are much higher stakes here. Fairfax wouldn't publish this unless they had total confidence in it.
That's nice dear. Good luck with it all.
That Essendon coach James Hird has a different recollection of the 2011 meeting in which he was warned by the AFL to avoid peptides where his players were concerned, is not surprising.Hird, whose example in embracing and pushing the risky drug program in which his loyal players were regularly injected with questionable substances, still has not come to grips with the perilous position in which he finds himself.This is despite the fact that significant chunks of evidence gathered by ASADA and the AFL has not been kind to Hird. As the ASADA findings are put together in Canberra and the AFL Commission braces itself for one of its toughest decisions, just how the competition handles the fall from grace of perhaps its most beloved hero of the past two decades remains the most fascinating human dilemma of this sorry saga.Hird hired the hard-line spin doctor Ian Hanke as his media adviser when it became clear he would require one. Hanke on Tuesday did not deny Hird had met the AFL in 2011 over peptides, but indicated, as the club did again on Wednesday, that it would be wrong to interpret the meeting in a negative way.Advertisement Hanke implied to Fairfax Media on Tuesday that when all the facts were revealed several commentators would be embarrassed and Hird would emerge unscathed. This is a familiar refrain, echoing that of Adelaide chief executive Steven Trigg last year before the AFL banned him.But it is understood Hird met AFL investigator Brett Clothier in late 2011 after it had come to the league's attention, via ASADA, that the coach was seeking information about certain peptides. Fairfax Media believes Clothier cautioned Hird more than once to stay away from peptides.Clothier has refused to comment on the meeting, but multiple sources close to the joint investigation into Essendon have confirmed the meeting took place. They have also confirmed the context of the warning.Meanwhile, it now appearsbeyond doubt that at least one of Hird's offsiders, senior assistant Mark Thompson, had taken issue with the volume and regularity of the injecting program and cautioned against it, despite the support it received from Hird and football operations boss Danny Corcoran.Just why Hird and his supporters believed the players required such heavy-handed and risky treatment and wanted to keep it secret has never been revealed.What is also beyond doubt is the anti-obesity drug AOD-9604 is just one substance among several allegedly given to the players, and even if the Bombers can prove ASADA approved it, there remains the question of other drugs, such as the banned peptide Thymosin beta-4 and the alleged presence of the WADA-prohibited Hexarelin.Equally certain is that Essendon has cast a pall over the integrity of the 2013 finals series. If the club contests the finals then its presence will be viewed by some as unsporting, and if it does not then the competition also will be tainted.At some point the senior coach - despite the formidable team of yes men surrounding him - must take some responsibility for that. We remain convinced the AFL will ensure it.
Read more:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/bombers-are-yet-to-face-facts-20130717-2q4n9.html#ixzz2ZJRD4jhc
O.J is innocent my good man,as are Essendon.Good luck with uncovering the truth about your little problem. Essendon's quest is like OJ Simpson's interminable search for "the real killer".
So first Thompson was the authoritative mastermind who was an absolute monty to get the sack. Now, he's the hero who tried to stop the evil injection program was but overruled by dictator Hird.28th February - Caro:
Thompson has been in denial on several fronts, far less convincingly on Fox Footy on Monday night when he tried again to play down his authority at Essendon over the past two years. The fact is that for all his coaching brilliance so crucial for the untried Hird, Thompson has had far too big a say in off-field issues and his failure to follow administrative practices in his zeal to improve and fast-track the Bombers’ fortunes was one reason Paul Hamilton’s position as football boss became untenable.
Thompson was not the only culprit, but there’s no doubt the football department became increasingly cavalier. And there seems little doubt that Thompson pushed for the appointment of Dean Robinson and, by extension, Dank, both of whom were given an irresponsibly long leash. Inexcusable when you consider the players and careers at risk.
Thompson therefore is unlikely to survive and will probably fall on his sword before the year’s end.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/thom...l#ixzz2ZJBlfv3l
17th July - Caro:
Meanwhile, it now appears beyond doubt that at least one of Hird's offsiders, senior assistant Mark Thompson, had taken issue with the volume and regularity of the injecting program and cautioned against it, despite the support it received from Hird and football operations boss Danny Corcoran.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/bomb...l#ixzz2ZJC7E6ji
It's pretty obvious she is getting it from Demetriou.
So ASADA have a record of Hird enquiring about peptides, and they alerted the AFL to it, so does anyone really think that ASADA would give approval for a peptide in 2012 after they had already dobbed in Hird earlier?
So ASADA have a record of Hird enquiring about peptides, and they alerted the AFL to it, so does anyone really think that ASADA would give approval for a peptide in 2012 after they had already dobbed in Hird earlier?
It's pretty obvious she is getting it from Demetriou.
+1 the damage if she incorrectly smeared someone in this case would be huge. i.e. end of career never work in the industry again stuff, or say in Essendon's case having a huge financial impact on their revenue through marketing, memberships etc. The Age probably have like five legal teams working on this since the number of involved parties, their size, and the damage of claims made against them could result in massive civil claims should they mess it up.Nobody's going to sue Caro if she's wrong about Ross Lyon staying at St Kilda. There are much higher stakes here. Fairfax wouldn't publish this unless they had total confidence in it.
O.J is innocent my good man,as are Essendon.
We hated her the most when she kept saying North would be relocated to the Gold Coast. Turned out she was well-briefed by the AFL, which was secretly working with our then Board to make it happen. The fact she was wrong in the end, because the Board and shareholders and supporters stepped in to change the game, doesn't undercut the fact that her reporting was not the personal vendetta we assumed it was in the lead up - she was a mouthpiece for what the AFL wanted to happen and was trying to make happen.
She doesn't like Brayshaw, but, again, even the silliest things she's reported about him weren't made up by her - they were fed to her. In club politics she can get distracted by her sources' agenda, but on AFL policy and issues I'd have thought her history says she's usually pretty well informed. And she is very experienced.
She's doubling down in her newest piece: www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/bombers-are-yet-to-face-facts-20130717-2q4n9.html
Never liked Caro in the past, but have to admit it's fun watching her unleash on people you think deserve it
I don't get why people are suggesting this.
Can someone explain for a simple sod like me?