No Oppo Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhaaaaaaaaa!!!

Just woke up at 4.25am here in England. Did you all hear me over there? Not going back to sleep tonight. Almost (but not quite) as good as a flag.

Now, just go get the flag, boys and make 2015 the brightest year in sport. (We'll take the Cricket World Cup and Ashes as a side dish. Thank you).

I'll drop in on this thread for a few more days, and then, appeals willing, kiss this Nine Circles of Hell good-bye.

Cheers everyone, enjoy the moment and GO THOSE BOMBERS!
 
G


Great to see you on here. Thanks for your help!

Thanks for the comment, to be honest I'm mainly here because I'm banned from the HTB.

I know the majority on HTB found this hard to believe, but I never viewed my opinions as actually being pro-EFC. That's just the way I saw the evidence, and I could never understand why these so-called experts were seeing something that I just couldn't see.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Thanks for the comment, to be honest I'm mainly here because I'm banned from the HTB.

I know the majority on HTB found this hard to believe, but I never viewed my opinions as actually being pro-EFC. That's just the way I saw the evidence, and I could never understand why these so-called experts were seeing something that I just couldn't see.

Missed ya buddy
 
It really is hard to see ASADA appealing.

Their whole case was based on hearsay, wild speculation and the interview transcripts of persons of ill-repute who had stated that they had no direct knowledge of EFC's supplements program from the very start.

Furthermore, it's obvious that ASADA's new modus operandi was to bully players into taking deals in exchange for admissions.

On this occasion, they found themselves going further into the process than they had first planned, being too clever by half, but playing with the careers of footballers in doing so.


Agree, & as Ings just said on radio - they had 4 weeks to present their evidence & the Tribunal overwhelmingly ruled against them.

Time for everyone to move on.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

hqdefault.jpg



^^^^^^^^^^This guy. Stuck with our story from start.

Thanks Sam
 
You were completely unbiased and everything that you said made sense. If you are arguing glass half full, your interpretation of materials may be different to those arguing half empty. Bottom line is you copped a lot of unjustified abuse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top