confusia say
Debutant
can anyone explain how the assistant coach( non playing ) from hepburn can become involved on the field with a buninyong player at 3q time,and when he gets physical and the player responds the ump sends the player off with a red card unable to be replaced for the rest of the game which had a huge effect on the result as buninyong were able to get within 5 pts with one short.
the umps response was that he saw a "unknown spectator" headbutt or attempt to headbutt the player and then saw the player attempt the same thing. so it was his duty to send off the player but he could do nothing about the "unknown spectator". at what point did we stop protecting the players on the field from this sort of thuggery from someone who has no business getting involved with any oppisition player at any time.
the league needs to investigate the matter and ban the assistant coach for life good old hepburn the great family club setting great examples for all up and coming hepburn kids.
if players have no rights when confronted by oppisition staff or supporters might be a great tatic to send suporters out to target good oppisition players and have them redcarded.
due to ump shortages the offending young ump will be fully supported in his decision as to save face and to be seen to fully defend the men in white which is not acceptable.
the league had better investigate this matter and hand out fitting punishment as buninyongs right to play fairly for the cup has been taken away and can not be given back.
this is a major incident and im sure it would not meet the conditions which were given to hepburn on being able to re-enter the league (after one of there better examples of how they are such a wounderful "family" club) and should be treated as such.
the chfl can not sweep this under the carpet it must act and insure that players are unapproachable on the footy field and have the right to defend if assulted.
the umps response was that he saw a "unknown spectator" headbutt or attempt to headbutt the player and then saw the player attempt the same thing. so it was his duty to send off the player but he could do nothing about the "unknown spectator". at what point did we stop protecting the players on the field from this sort of thuggery from someone who has no business getting involved with any oppisition player at any time.
the league needs to investigate the matter and ban the assistant coach for life good old hepburn the great family club setting great examples for all up and coming hepburn kids.
if players have no rights when confronted by oppisition staff or supporters might be a great tatic to send suporters out to target good oppisition players and have them redcarded.
due to ump shortages the offending young ump will be fully supported in his decision as to save face and to be seen to fully defend the men in white which is not acceptable.
the league had better investigate this matter and hand out fitting punishment as buninyongs right to play fairly for the cup has been taken away and can not be given back.
this is a major incident and im sure it would not meet the conditions which were given to hepburn on being able to re-enter the league (after one of there better examples of how they are such a wounderful "family" club) and should be treated as such.
the chfl can not sweep this under the carpet it must act and insure that players are unapproachable on the footy field and have the right to defend if assulted.