Champion Data has officially jumped the shark.

[A Cut Above]

2020 list ratings: Kangas' shock rise, Dogs tipped to shine

Champion Data has released its rankings of the 2020 AFL lists. Where does your club rate?

www.afl.com.au

North Melbourne is also predicted to have a bumper season with its list ranked sixth overall

Go home Champion Data, you're drunk.

 

[crazywildhorse]

2020 list ratings: Kangas' shock rise, Dogs tipped to shine

Champion Data has released its rankings of the 2020 AFL lists. Where does your club rate?

www.afl.com.au

Go home Champion Data, you're drunk.

Don’t forget though, they did not panic and went through an exhaustive search looking for the best available coach.

(just like Carlton)

 

[Collins-Langford-Ayres]

Oh dear, could their credibility be shot any more?

 

[A Cut Above]

GWS' midfield contains Kelly, Coniglio, Whitfield, Ward, Taranto & Hopper. Champion Data rates it 12th best.

 

[DanWA]

Don’t forget though, they did not panic and went through an exhaustive search looking for the best available coach.

(just like Carlton)

Like how Cockburn only considered Cockburn people

 

[Virgin Dog]

GWS' midfield contains Kelly, Coniglio, Whitfield, Ward, Taranto & Hopper. Champion Data rates it 12th best.

Pretty sure the rankings are affected by injuries (like Tom Mitchell is not considered elite). So Kelly and Ward wouldn't contribute as much as you might think. Add to that the fact that their ruck division is woeful, and it results in a 12th place ranking. I still would've thought it would be higher, but who knows how this shit works.

Even worse is that the Dogs' defence is ranked 2nd, yet we conceded the 3rd most goals to opposition key forwards and were somewhere around the bottom 6 for points scored against us. I genuinely can't understand how we've ended up 2nd for defence. If anything, that's the main weakness in our side

 

[And_ROOS]

However, the boffins don't have the same fondness for a Geelong backline that conceded the fewest points in the competition last year.
The Cats have been ranked a lowly 16th for defence, ahead only of Carlton and wooden spooners Gold Coast.

CD, you guys need to lay off the cough syrup. Seriously guys, we are worried about you.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

Always West Coke and Hawscum supporters whinging about something who cares what Champion Data say we all know the Tigers will win anyway.
Fight for second between yourselves minnows

 

[Coach_Required]

Well it's now obvious North is the new Demons for 2020

Poor bastards.

 

[Stronzo]

They couldn’t be much worse than the predictions done by commentators.

 

[A Cut Above]

Pretty sure the rankings are affected by injuries (like Tom Mitchell is not considered elite). So Kelly and Ward wouldn't contribute as much as you might think. Add to that the fact that their ruck division is woeful, and it results in a 12th place ranking. I still would've thought it would be higher, but who knows how this shit works.

Even worse is that the Dogs' defence is ranked 2nd, yet we conceded the 3rd most goals to opposition key forwards and were somewhere around the bottom 6 for points scored against us. I genuinely can't understand how we've ended up 2nd for defence. If anything, that's the main weakness in our side

It makes very little sense. Like Geelong's backline conceding fewest points (admittedly thanks to the Cheat Ground) but their defense being rated 16th. Wait, actually I have no problem with that but GWS' midfield being 12th is a joke when its by far the deepest in the comp and was even with Ward injured.

Doggies' defense is one of the worst in the league so Champion Data must rate your defenders as individual stat padders, rather than as a unit.

 

[Turnover]

Triggered by champion data

 

[Virgin Dog]

It makes very little sense. Like Geelong's backline conceding fewest points (admittedly thanks to the Cheat Ground) but their defense being rated 16th. Wait, actually I have no problem with that but GWS' midfield being 12th is a joke when its by far the deepest in the comp and was even with Ward injured.

Doggies' defense is one of the worst in the league so Champion Data must rate your defenders as individual stat padders, rather than as a unit.

I think Caleb Daniel and Matt Suckling must be what's causing it. Both rated as elite by CD. Daniel I can sort of understand, but Suckling was a surprise to say the least. Our defence overall would be bottom 6 at the very least in my opinion. Maybe Keath improves it somewhat, but nowhere near the realm of 2nd place

 

[A Bit Dusty]

How the hell can the Tigers be ranked No1 in defence when according to the rest of the competitions supporters we are the worst?

 

[And_ROOS]

Kangaroos can get this printed on a trophy its probably about the best it is going to get for them in 2020.

 

[Bleeeeeeeeep]

Ohhhhh.... the jelly is sweet.
Just wait till we get our monorail.

 

[TazHawk15]

Always West Coke and Hawscum supporters whinging about something who cares what Champion Data say we all know the Tigers will win anyway.
Fight for second between yourselves minnows

13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12, Minnow Tigger Flog.

 

[Grin]

Champion data is absolute rubbish. Always has been. Everyone knows it. Unless you're playing one of those champion data pick and trade your team games designed for virgins.

 

[Starburns_]

Champion Data are bigger trolls these days than Roby ever was.

 

[brett15]

13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12, Minnow Tigger Flog.

 

[Grin]

Dungeons and Dragons.

 

[TazHawk15]

13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12.

 

[A Cut Above]

How the hell can the Tigers be ranked No1 in defence when according to the rest of the competitions supporters we are the worst?

Its Richmond's supporters we don't rate.

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

They couldn’t be much worse than the predictions done by commentators.

Ahem *cough* footy experts *cough*.

Please remember yourself good sir.

 

[the avoca drover]

13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12.

Squark bok bok