Chris Johnson

Remove this Banner Ad

Anyone remember what Alan's number was? I can't remember what it was off the top of my head, but if it's not in use he would probably get that.

#12, #17, #7 and #4 are all possibilities. I wonder what Holland will get!
 
unfortunately his old man wore number 9... but he hasn't proven himself yet, perhaps he may be given a higher number, and if he does well recieve his old mans if neita hangs up the boots... but lets hope that's not for a while...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

On the subject of numbers:

Holland - #22
Johnson - #12
Sylvia - #36.

#4 should be reserved. It is a jinx.

If we don't get Sylvia I will go beserk.
 
Originally posted by Demon37


If we don't get Sylvia I will go beserk.

What if Caaaaaaaaaaaaarlton draft him?

I hope they go for Tenace...

We always seem to try & continue traditions at Melbourne which is why I reckon Sylvia should get Viney's old number.

I'd say Miller is more deserving of #5 than Smith at this stage. Holland could get it too.
 
I heard them say on 3aw tonight that Caaarlton are firming for Raph Clarke at 2.

I was trying to find some info on Johnson today and found out that he had to play at least one game in the WA Colts to be able to nominate for the draft.

He kicked 5 goals and was East Fremantle's best in a one point loss. Now I know this is only under 18 footy but it shows he can play the game.

As far as numbers are concerned, I'd like 22 to be handed out. Get supporters cheering on a new "hero".

Nick Walsh had 12 this season, has he been delisted from the rookie list?
 
Originally posted by Deemolition
I heard them say on 3aw tonight that Caaarlton are firming for Raph Clarke at 2.


Nick Walsh had 12 this season, has he been delisted from the rookie list?

Hehe The Blues are welcome to Clarke! As long as we get Sylvia & 1 of Dunn, McLean or Insert hard nut ballwinner ;).

Pretty sure Nick Walsh has been de-listed or at least will be.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Chris Johnson

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top