Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Entirely not true. If its an allegation and there is no vision, then the AFL may well get statements off the players, umpires, even photos of the teeth marks...Although, doesnt he wear a mouthguard??If there is no vision - then Masten is as innocent as Essendon
Masten has his mouth guard in so any marks would be bottom row of teeth only, but players don't get up that convinced that something happened without being certain. Suban wouldn't have been so adamant had it just been a scratch or something, his reaction is the most damning thing I think.
as per the umpiring that day, no free kick for Suban even though the guy just bit him.
Entirely not true. If its an allegation and there is no vision, then the AFL may well get statements off the players, umpires, even photos of the teeth marks...Although, doesnt he wear a mouthguard??
Interested to see Freo fans response to this with what evidence there is.
If you're saving up a bite to try and rub someone out Suban would be smart enough to do it to Shuey or someone that the players and fans dislike. I'm sure Masten isn't going to run for mayor of Fremantle any time soon but I don't think he'd be on many Freo fans' lists of most hated Eagles. If you're trying to con a suspension just for the sake of it he'd have gone at Shuey off the ball and made the same accusation.
as per the umpiring that day, no free kick for Suban even though the guy just bit him.
as per the umpiring that day, no free kick for Suban even though the guy just bit him.
Masten would have had one for striking first. Set shot on goal from a better angle and a better kick of the footy, I'd have taken it over McGinnity from the boundary.as per the umpiring that day, no free kick for Suban even though the guy just bit him.
Suban had just wacked him in the face with his forearm, so please stop playing the victim.
Also the umpire didn't see it so it's not like he could just give a free kick because "a player said so"
I also wonder if the umpire actually made a note of it and is the one who put forward to have the incident investigated or was it media driven due to it being heard over the mic?
Also the umpire didn't see it so it's not like he could just give a free kick because "a player said so"
I also wonder if the umpire actually made a note of it and is the one who put forward to have the incident investigated or was it media driven due to it being heard over the mic?
Wow biting.. the guy is scum.
This Nick Suban?
Few minutes left in a loss? Yeah better start a fight with Mark Hutchings, the leagues most vanilla, most inoffensive player. Scumbag.No the scum is Suban the initiator.
He came into this match wanting to start biff all game.
Is he dentist when not playing footy ?
Perhaps he was checking Mr Knees teeth
Strange post. Players wrestle every game. Its not every day that a player responds by allegedly biting a bloke.No the scum is Suban the initiator.
He came into this match wanting to start biff all game.
Defending biting?Subans is that bloke who pushes someone around like a bully and then runs off to mummy when he gets put back in his place.
Complete coward of a bloke.
No the scum is Suban the initiator.
He came into this match wanting to start biff all game.
Take it when Suarez chomped on all those blokes in the soccer it was the fault of players he bit?No the scum is Suban the initiator.
He came into this match wanting to start biff all game.