Society/Culture Christchurch Mosque mass shooting

Remove this Banner Ad

Reader mode
Baltimore Jack said:
Click to expand...

sherb said:
That's excellent. Thanks for posting.
Click to expand...
Because Jihadists have never had sympathetic front covers

D12uvgLWsAE5knk.jpg


The outright lying of Islamophiles is something to behold.
 
Ron The Bear said:
Foreigner with a long criminal record including attempted murder and rape charges. Exactly the type Dutton is trying to expel.
Click to expand...
What if he was german? Would you say the same? You're quite happy to have Tommy Robinson in the country yet he's a convicted violent criminal.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bradesmaen said:
What if he was german? Would you say the same?
Click to expand...

Yeah, why not?
You're quite happy to have Tommy Robinson in the country yet he's a convicted violent criminal.
Click to expand...

Don't think I've ever posted/uttered a word about Tommy Robinson. But you know what I'd say if I did. That's some talent.
 
Last edited:
Baltimore Jack said:
Click to expand...


Isn't saying "hey this terrorist is just like many of us...was once an angelic looking kid with curly blonde locks..grew up in this little town...was working class" the right way to address it? Rather than "hey this guy has nothing to do with us, he was always different"? Surely that's more likely to lead to questions like "how did this person become a monster?" and maybe help prevent someone else going down the same path?
 
fleabitten said:
Isn't saying "hey this terrorist is just like many of us...was once an angelic looking kid with curly blonde locks..grew up in this little town...was working class" the right way to address it? Rather than "hey this guy has nothing to do with us, he was always different"? Surely that's more likely to lead to questions like "how did this person become a monster?" and maybe help prevent someone else going down the same path?
Click to expand...

Guess who?

Martin-Bryant-with-wombat.jpg
 
fleabitten said:
Isn't saying "hey this terrorist is just like many of us...was once an angelic looking kid with curly blonde locks..grew up in this little town...was working class" the right way to address it? Rather than "hey this guy has nothing to do with us, he was always different"? Surely that's more likely to lead to questions like "how did this person become a monster?" and maybe help prevent someone else going down the same path?
Click to expand...
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s soft focus Rolling Stone cover evoked outright lust at the time - “how could a young man so beautiful turn into a terrorist”

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/opi...rnaev-free-jahar-fangirls-20130710-story.html
 
Baltimore Jack said:
A Tale of Two Prime Ministers:

Jacinda Ardern on refugees "They have chosen to make New Zealand their home, & it is their home.”

Scott Morrison on asylum seekers “They may be a pedophile, a rapist, a murderer... carry serious communicable diseases."
Click to expand...
Compare each countries level of refugee intake and actual immigration levels.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

its free real estate said:
Compare each countries level of refugee intake and actual immigration levels.
Click to expand...
So they should reduce right-wing immigration to stop violent attacks?
Where are the 'free speech' advocates now?
 
fleabitten said:
Isn't saying "hey this terrorist is just like many of us...was once an angelic looking kid with curly blonde locks..grew up in this little town...was working class" the right way to address it? Rather than "hey this guy has nothing to do with us, he was always different"? Surely that's more likely to lead to questions like "how did this person become a monster?" and maybe help prevent someone else going down the same path?
Click to expand...
I think her point is that we are not asking the same question for 'brown' terrorist.
 
smokingjacket said:
Love to be on the left while claiming that white workers demanding a better life than what neoliberalism has delivered is responsible for a terrorist attack.


White entitlement is part of the very structure of Australian society

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...t-of-the-very-structure-of-australian-society
Click to expand...

Professors aren't what they used to be.
Anthropologist? - this must be from some new school of post modern Foucault anthropology.

First, the entire article is riddled with outrageous sweeping generalisations
After imaginatively creating a false dilemma - for white people - it conjures up an equally fictional response for white people, conveniently supporting the author's confirmation bias. It assumes guilt by colour, anger by colour, hate by colour. An ad hominem not remotely interested in any burden of proof, it entirely ignores complexity of any sort. The article is circular - problem cause problem - and the problem is the cause! -Whiteness!

This is a sad and embarrassing post modern screed. I can see this article will be used by History professors - some 40 years form now as an example of the insanity which possessed our culture at this time.

And the writing is also appalling.
 
Last edited:
Reader mode

Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Christchurch Mosque mass shooting

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top