F it...claim it anyway!Can’t claim it, like all amazing quotes, it’s from the Simpsons.
Homer the source of truth as always…..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
F it...claim it anyway!Can’t claim it, like all amazing quotes, it’s from the Simpsons.
Homer the source of truth as always…..
Going the cheap option was always a risk.Be interesting to see if any Melbourne supporters have a foot fetish and can detmine if he had a new foot tattoo in the mid part of the year.
NGL I genuinely thought the way everything happened that it was 2nd strike related but have heard now that the infected blister was the result of a foot tattoo after he initially injured the hammy, which then completely messed with his ability to properly do rehab on the hammy.
That's the extent of what I was told, but would be interesting to know what impact an infection in the foot could have on a hamstring recovery. Was either pushing too hard or simply bad luck with circumstances that caused the longer setback with the hammy tho.
Hope he is right for finals as he is an absolute gun, regardless of support having guys like him on the park in our biggest games is what we want to see.
Think Jake King and Ty Vickery made their tattoo parlour business backyard tattoos to feel more edgy. Poor old Clarry got lured into it.Going the cheap option was always a risk.
Don’t do Carter like that, he’s done nothing to deserve it.Spotted training with The Wallabies
View attachment 1738999
I'd almost put money on him coming back for the Carlton game.Will he play again this year?
Rd 22 will be 12 weeks served .Will he play again this year?
Rd 22 will be 12 weeks served .
On the second strike a player's name is made public and he serves a four-match suspension. A third strike incurs a 12-match suspension.
Problem with this theory is that there hasn't been a four week ban with him being publicly named.I mean, you are not wrong.
It's an inordinate amount of time to miss for a hamstring 'complaint' that allowed him to play out the game in round 10.
How the new AFL illicit drugs policy works
Nathan Schmook explains the AFL's revamped illicit drugs policywww.afl.com.au
The only issue with this theory is that the only time Oliver, who has been remarkably durable, has missed 4 matches in a row was in his debut season. Unless somehow the COVID shutdown time was allowed to count? Now perhaps; pudgy, unprofessional Clayton got caught twice in the first 13 rounds of 2016. That's possible, but seems unlikely that someone who was caught twice in a year, was not caught for another 7 years.
I have to admit though, it's very suspicious that he will return after exactly 12 weeks, from an injury that has smelt a bit like BS from the start...
Rd 22 will be 12 weeks served .
Problem with this theory is that there hasn't been a four week ban with him being publicly named.
Also, if you are banned I'd expect the player to not have any contact with the club.
Did you read the article you attached?I addressed that, did you even read my post?
What you might expect and what actually plays out could very well be two different scenarios. I put nothing past the AFL when it comes to protecting their image and brand.
A cover up like this, which could be potentially exposed, would be worse than the AFL banning a single player. I don't trust them but I think they are too smart to put their reputation on the line for a player doing party drugs.
I did the maths and can confirm that this is untrue. He's missed 10 games accounting for the bye.Rd 22 will be 12 weeks served .
Yes. He's an odd ball for sure. Behaving erratic is his normal from what I can gather. Gets tongue tied/slurs words. I think that's just him though.just saw him getting doorstepped on his way into the club on 360...has he always come across as that cooked?
Yes. He's an odd ball for sure. Behaving erratic is his normal from what I can gather. Gets tongue tied/slurs words. I think that's just him though.
If ASADA testers were involved it would all be made public. But its not, so what you are saying is the AFL independently took samples from him, tested the samples, then covered up the result because they don't want players caught, and the player and club staged a dramatic confrontation with the trainers to further cover up the positive test, all orchestrated by the corrupt AFL, who don't want players to be caught, but against all their procedures decided to independently test a player for drugs, and then went into damage control to make sure nobody is known to test positive to drugs..........ok....
Sounds much easier than just not testing or suspending him.......
The level of stupidity of Bigfooty posters never ceases to amaze me.
This is him at last years AA for referencejust saw him getting doorstepped on his way into the club on 360...has he always come across as that cooked?