Is this article delusional or is it just me
Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explained
Where maligned $7m star could land as AFL’s biggest trade mystery explainedwww.foxsports.com.au
Seems to suggest a top 5 pick is starters to extract him. Says Saints might not have the picks. Suggests that the monster contract he is on actually increases the trade value.
I think if Melbourne offered to pay 50% they still don’t get a top pick.
To me it’s maybe a pick 25 if Melbourne pay 30%.
Grundy is the comp for me and he had no off field risks and was in much better form.
There is clearly a market and Dees don’t need the cap space.
Why would they pay 50% for him to play for another team against them? To free up cap space they don’t need?
Anyway there’s already a thread on this in the trade board.