Game Day Collingwood v Brisbane, Marvel, 18 August, 7.50pm

[Dead Eye Didak]

was he sore last week?

This time of the year majority are sore....

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

Tom Browne must be running counter intelligence for us.

Running counter to intelligence is more believable.

On SM-G981B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Horaceg]

The more players we have out, the more I think we'll win. I think we'll make a statement tonight that our systems are still the best in the league, regardless of who's out

I like this

 

[Chameleon75]

There's an element of risk there, if we lose a gazelle and have a giraffe as the sub.

of course, but what happens if Cameron went down, frampton is needed down back, if Moore was playing it wouldn’t be much of a concern, there’s risks everywhere

 

[Horaceg]

Is it normal for all 4 emergencies to warm up

You wouldn’t think so but Side by Side, keep ‘em guessing

 

[Gaben]

of course, but what happens if Cameron went down, frampton is needed down back, if Moore was playing it wouldn’t be much of a concern, there’s risks everywhere

Yes, let's choose our sub based on if one player goes down rather than if the other 21 do. Solid plan.

 

[IlovethePies]

Cox being named sub is both bizarre and intriguing.
On one level it makes no sense whatsoever. If Cameron were sore, why would we not select Cox in the 22 and omit Cameron?
So, assuming then that Cameron is not sore, are we making a direct comparison between Cox and Cameron as to who should play finals, or are we perhaps also testing out Cox and Cameron together should another player be subbed out?
Or are we simply trying to shock Brisbane into submission?
I am not unhappy with Cox being sub, as I was really convinced that he had to play, and at least this partially satisfies me.

 

[gerryg400]

Cox the sub. Great if we plan to sub off Cameron, Howe, Checkers or someone and get no injuries... But a bold strategy nonetheless.

There are games where both have played 4 quarters.

 

[PIEWITHSAUCE]

was he sore last week?

I hope so (the way he was moving) - despite his performance Checkers still looks quite restricted too.

 

[Horaceg]

Cox being named sub is both bizarre and intriguing.
On one level it makes no sense whatsoever. If Cameron were sore, why would we not select Cox in the 22 and omit Cameron?
So, assuming then that Cameron is not sore, are we making a direct comparison between Cox and Cameron as to who should play finals, or are we perhaps also testing out Cox and Cameron together should another player be subbed out?
Or are we simply trying to shock Brisbane into submission?
I am not unhappy with Cox being sub, as I was really convinced that he had to play, and at least this partially satisfies me.

Maybe a dress rehearsal, Cox and Cameron each get a half to ply their trade.

 

[unplugged]

Cox being named sub is both bizarre and intriguing.
On one level it makes no sense whatsoever. If Cameron were sore, why would we not select Cox in the 22 and omit Cameron?
So, assuming then that Cameron is not sore, are we making a direct comparison between Cox and Cameron as to who should play finals, or are we perhaps also testing out Cox and Cameron together should another player be subbed out?
Or are we simply trying to shock Brisbane into submission?
I am not unhappy with Cox being sub, as I was really convinced that he had to play, and at least this partially satisfies me.

End of the day if Cox needs to be subbed on we can make a few adjustments to make it work playing him as forward. Howe down back, etc.

 

[Scodog10]

Jeez Cox as the sub is a bold move. If we’re in a Port situation needing more run and have a runner go down this won’t look good in review.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

Saw Cox out there warming up so I guess he’s in in some fashion. Seems the sub as many are saying.

So who would be the out?

 

[whiskeytown]

Cox as sub has been done once before…

Rd 19 2021 vs power

Kicked 1.1

 

[IlovethePies]

Jeez Cox as the sub is a bold move. If we’re in a Port situation needing more run and have a runner go down this won’t look good in review.

I do think that our selections for the 22 (keeping WHE in, with Markov, Noble and Ryan all in the 22 as well, we are assuming that we have lots of run. Therefore, height is where we might be slightly light, not run.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

I like this

Me too but it’s wishful thinking lol

Brisbane will win I just don’t want to get pumped

 

[HotPiesWithSauce]

Hopefully Cox as sub is a master stroke and he comes in and makes an impact

Honestly can't see it myself, but I couldn't coach a flock of sheep so I'll trust in Fly

 

[Andrewy]

Big Coxy could go off tonight . Will go hard when he enters the fray. Will stand up erect firm and proud. Cmon on everyone ...get around him

 

[Milux]

There's an element of risk there, if we lose a gazelle and have a giraffe as the sub.

I feel this way whenever fort is sub.

 

[MagpieJoel]

Shash em. Media writing us off. Fox Footy telling everyone how the Lions might allow us to win the game.

flipping show em.

 

[Finnishpie]

Cox as sub is beyond strange.

 

[jakson68]

Ok, so Cox as the sub.

Obviously treating the game as a no holds back must win

F**k it would be funny if we won.

 

[Timmy from Thomastown]

123, but who’s counting

Pretty hard to rack up 200 when you start late retire early and spend two years mid career driving Ubers

 

[anshell]

The Lions have won 8 of their last 10 games on this ground apparently.Nice of the AFL to schedule this game on their second favourite ground in the country.Whatever happened to teams having a home ground advantage?

 

[Looney]

Shash em. Media writing us off. Fox Footy telling everyone had Lions might allow us to win the game.

*ing show em.

Both teams might be trying to throw the game. It could be a nil all draw.