
- Sep 28, 2009
- 24,132
- 34,995
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Reading FC
Always a risk recruiting someone off one game. He may just match up well on Obrien.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Supercoach Round 3 SC Talk - Round 3 Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 2 AF Talk - Round 3 AF Trades
Also he’s trying to prove himself to get a contract. ROB is slothlike at the best of times, and was probably just thinking about beers after the gameAlways a risk recruiting someone off one game. He may just match up well on Obrien.
Heaps of work gone into that!Under the scenario that we give up our 2025 R1 and 2026 R1 for the 2 Warner brothers and, depending where the picks lay, we might get something back. A repeat of 2024 and I would want the Swans R1 2025 back if we give up say 3 and a F1. I have added the Warner brother in Green
The only given delisting is likely to be Sheed.
I am assuming our F/S and 3 NGA's continue to track as draftable. Important point - having clarity on our club tied prospects is valuable as it allows us to shape the list earlier.
With the additions (1 x FS, 3 x NGA and 2 x Warner) and only 1 subtraction, we would have 52 on the list. Therefore we need to shed a total of 9 assuming we take 3 live picks.
Contract calls will be difficult
- Sheed is easy
- Cripps will be 34 in 2026 but he is the sort of player that I expect Mini will love.
- Jamieson looks an easy call given he cannot stay on the park and the pick up of Brock and repositioning of Barnett takes heat away from the KPD role that he is hoping to play but never shown much.
- Livingstone might be unlucky as there will be pressure on the Cat B list and we look to have a decent set of talls developing.
- Chesser will be under massive pressure. First thing - we need to forget that he was a R1 pick. That is rear vision mirror list management. He has to find his position be it running defender or wing (I personally doubt the latter as he does not read the play).
- Bazzo has had a stormy start to life in the AFL so I am hoping like crazy he has a good run of it in 2025. Can he play the 2nd KPD or is it only the 3rd Tall?
- Rawlinson will have the spotlight on him. With the 2 NGA prospects in 2025 and Champion, we are looking full in the small forward brigade. He needs to play for his spot this year.
- Petruccelle is an interesting one. He has all the attributes and we now just need him to find a coach with a game plan that works for him. Failing that - he is possibly off.
- Hunt is out of contract and will be 30 in 2026. He will want a strong year to get another contract.
- Cole is out of contract and will be 29 in 2026. He will have pressure from Johnston and Grego
- Dewar looks to have taken another step up looking more like a starting 23 than a delist.
- Hutchinson is the same as Dewar.
- Allen is the big question mark. His durability is the big issue for him in 2025 and being a RFA, we can afford to wait. If he gets the longer deal offer from Brisbane or Saints, then we get to match it or get another pointy end R1 pick. I expect him to stay but the top end $$ and duration will be dependent on him staying on the park and playing like he did in 2023 with his 53 goals over 23 games
- Kellys is out of contract and the recent publicity means it time to step up. He is not a FA and unlikely to want to leave Perth so it is stay at WCE on a moderate salary or make up with the Purples and see if they are prepared to trade for him.
- Champion is way too soon to be speculating.
- Brock is similar - too soon.
In terms of Ryan, I have no idea what was happening with the speculation of a trade at the end of 2024. He will be 30 in 2026 so not sure what would be on offer. He is contracted until the end of 2026 and may well like a 3 year offer thereby extending his career until he is 32. Suns are about the only club I can see that would offer up a decent pick for him.
The best possible outcome will be for us to get the AFL to allow us 2 to 4 more spots on our Cat B list for improving the AFL ability to bring in indigenous talent.
Obviously we cannot have 52 on the list. but it shows in red who is out of contract and hence what tough contract calls are to be made.
View attachment 2229979
They can keep their Rd1 pick and make it a Rd2 and we get Sheldrick too.Under the scenario that we give up our 2025 R1 and 2026 R1 for the 2 Warner brothers and, depending where the picks lay, we might get something back. A repeat of 2024 and I would want the Swans R1 2025 back if we give up say 3 and a F1. I have added the Warner brother in Green
The only given delisting is likely to be Sheed.
I am assuming our F/S and 3 NGA's continue to track as draftable. Important point - having clarity on our club tied prospects is valuable as it allows us to shape the list earlier.
With the additions (1 x FS, 3 x NGA and 2 x Warner) and only 1 subtraction, we would have 52 on the list. Therefore we need to shed a total of 9 assuming we take 3 live picks.
Contract calls will be difficult
- Sheed is easy
- Cripps will be 34 in 2026 but he is the sort of player that I expect Mini will love.
- Jamieson looks an easy call given he cannot stay on the park and the pick up of Brock and repositioning of Barnett takes heat away from the KPD role that he is hoping to play but never shown much.
- Livingstone might be unlucky as there will be pressure on the Cat B list and we look to have a decent set of talls developing.
- Chesser will be under massive pressure. First thing - we need to forget that he was a R1 pick. That is rear vision mirror list management. He has to find his position be it running defender or wing (I personally doubt the latter as he does not read the play).
- Bazzo has had a stormy start to life in the AFL so I am hoping like crazy he has a good run of it in 2025. Can he play the 2nd KPD or is it only the 3rd Tall?
- Rawlinson will have the spotlight on him. With the 2 NGA prospects in 2025 and Champion, we are looking full in the small forward brigade. He needs to play for his spot this year.
- Petruccelle is an interesting one. He has all the attributes and we now just need him to find a coach with a game plan that works for him. Failing that - he is possibly off.
- Hunt is out of contract and will be 30 in 2026. He will want a strong year to get another contract.
- Cole is out of contract and will be 29 in 2026. He will have pressure from Johnston and Grego
- Dewar looks to have taken another step up looking more like a starting 23 than a delist.
- Hutchinson is the same as Dewar.
- Allen is the big question mark. His durability is the big issue for him in 2025 and being a RFA, we can afford to wait. If he gets the longer deal offer from Brisbane or Saints, then we get to match it or get another pointy end R1 pick. I expect him to stay but the top end $$ and duration will be dependent on him staying on the park and playing like he did in 2023 with his 53 goals over 23 games
- Kellys is out of contract and the recent publicity means it time to step up. He is not a FA and unlikely to want to leave Perth so it is stay at WCE on a moderate salary or make up with the Purples and see if they are prepared to trade for him.
- Champion is way too soon to be speculating.
- Brock is similar - too soon.
In terms of Ryan, I have no idea what was happening with the speculation of a trade at the end of 2024. He will be 30 in 2026 so not sure what would be on offer. He is contracted until the end of 2026 and may well like a 3 year offer thereby extending his career until he is 32. Suns are about the only club I can see that would offer up a decent pick for him.
The best possible outcome will be for us to get the AFL to allow us 2 to 4 more spots on our Cat B list for improving the AFL ability to bring in indigenous talent.
Obviously we cannot have 52 on the list. but it shows in red who is out of contract and hence what tough contract calls are to be made.
View attachment 2229979
I'd be disappointed if he has any less than nine lives.Cato has that innate ability to land on his feet all the time
Under the scenario that we give up our 2025 R1 and 2026 R1 for the 2 Warner brothers and, depending where the picks lay, we might get something back. A repeat of 2024 and I would want the Swans R1 2025 back if we give up say 3 and a F1. I have added the Warner brother in Green
The only given delisting is likely to be Sheed.
I am assuming our F/S and 3 NGA's continue to track as draftable. Important point - having clarity on our club tied prospects is valuable as it allows us to shape the list earlier.
With the additions (1 x FS, 3 x NGA and 2 x Warner) and only 1 subtraction, we would have 52 on the list. Therefore we need to shed a total of 9 assuming we take 3 live picks.
Contract calls will be difficult
- Sheed is easy
- Cripps will be 34 in 2026 but he is the sort of player that I expect Mini will love.
- Jamieson looks an easy call given he cannot stay on the park and the pick up of Brock and repositioning of Barnett takes heat away from the KPD role that he is hoping to play but never shown much.
- Livingstone might be unlucky as there will be pressure on the Cat B list and we look to have a decent set of talls developing.
- Chesser will be under massive pressure. First thing - we need to forget that he was a R1 pick. That is rear vision mirror list management. He has to find his position be it running defender or wing (I personally doubt the latter as he does not read the play).
- Bazzo has had a stormy start to life in the AFL so I am hoping like crazy he has a good run of it in 2025. Can he play the 2nd KPD or is it only the 3rd Tall?
- Rawlinson will have the spotlight on him. With the 2 NGA prospects in 2025 and Champion, we are looking full in the small forward brigade. He needs to play for his spot this year.
- Petruccelle is an interesting one. He has all the attributes and we now just need him to find a coach with a game plan that works for him. Failing that - he is possibly off.
- Hunt is out of contract and will be 30 in 2026. He will want a strong year to get another contract.
- Cole is out of contract and will be 29 in 2026. He will have pressure from Johnston and Grego
- Dewar looks to have taken another step up looking more like a starting 23 than a delist.
- Hutchinson is the same as Dewar.
- Allen is the big question mark. His durability is the big issue for him in 2025 and being a RFA, we can afford to wait. If he gets the longer deal offer from Brisbane or Saints, then we get to match it or get another pointy end R1 pick. I expect him to stay but the top end $$ and duration will be dependent on him staying on the park and playing like he did in 2023 with his 53 goals over 23 games
- Kellys is out of contract and the recent publicity means it time to step up. He is not a FA and unlikely to want to leave Perth so it is stay at WCE on a moderate salary or make up with the Purples and see if they are prepared to trade for him.
- Champion is way too soon to be speculating.
- Brock is similar - too soon.
In terms of Ryan, I have no idea what was happening with the speculation of a trade at the end of 2024. He will be 30 in 2026 so not sure what would be on offer. He is contracted until the end of 2026 and may well like a 3 year offer thereby extending his career until he is 32. Suns are about the only club I can see that would offer up a decent pick for him.
The best possible outcome will be for us to get the AFL to allow us 2 to 4 more spots on our Cat B list for improving the AFL ability to bring in indigenous talent.
Obviously we cannot have 52 on the list. but it shows in red who is out of contract and hence what tough contract calls are to be made.
View attachment 2229979
100%Just on the composition of our list and the changes we are likely or need to make before the end of the year that might impact delistings
As you say we are now a full book with 37 main, 5 rookie and 2 cat-b listed players
• Dewar will have been on the rookie list for 3 years at the end of the season and has to be upgraded to the main list if we retain him (which appears likely on preseason form)
• Sheed will be put on the inactive list at some point and eventually retired by season’s end. Potentially he’ll be replaced with a SSP signing in the next two days which currently seems unlikely. That will mean we probably use a pick in the MSD and given it’s probably an early (top 5) pick it’s a good chance the player will be on an 18 month contract (to 2026)
That gives us the same list split (37/5/2) and 15 players out of contract with Sheed already delisted
I’d be confident Allen, Kelly, Hutchinson and Dewar will be offered new contracts at some point
If we are to bring in the following as you’ve suggested :
Trade - Warner and Warner
Draft - Midfielder (Swans R1), KPD (Hawks R1), Ruck (WC R2)
NGA and F/S - Banfield, Walley, Evans, Caton
(That list doesn’t include Starcevich who we may well be keen on as a FA)
Then only 2 of the following 11 can be retained :
Hunt, Cripps, Chesser, Petruccelle, Cole, Bazzo, Rawlinson, Champion, Livingstone, Jamieson and Brock
That’s a brutal list cull with only Jamieson and Rawlinson being obvious delistees. Some may also add Petruccelle and Livingstone to that pair. And Chesser I guess
I’d be more inclined to ask for Sydney’s F1 than their R1 and forgo drafting a mid since we’d have the two Warners and Banfield coming in as mids
Evans and Caton will both need very good draft years to justify us moving players on to create the necessary list spots
We may look at delisting/drafting players like BWilliams, Barnett or Brockman depending on how they perform this year as an alternative to delisting one or more of those out of contract players
I don’t envy Matt Clarke at all - he has some really big calls to make
Asking the AFL for two additional rookie list spots is almost a no brainer :
• We have a unique reserves setup and struggle to attract talent to our WAFL team so two additional AFL spots will help development of our squad
• Along with Fremantle, we travel significantly more than the other 16 clubs so having two extra players on our squad gives us additional depth to cover the increased risk of injury that travel exposes us to
• Two additional rookie list spots has minimal impact on the rest of the competition but gives us two extra late chances to improve our list
• The AFL could ensure we add indigenous lads as those extra two spots by making them cat b rookies
Have always felt Edwards is better suited to the looser interceptor, problem is he’s always had to play the lockdown with McGovern or Barrass ahead of him in the preferred role.Edwards is not quick, but Harris Andrews is a glacier and he goes alright.
My main issue with Edwards are his starting points, he seems to too often give his opponents the leading lane by standing in the wrong spots. Forward reacts first and big H is on the back foot and no chance.
We can also be much better as a team at pressuring up the field, and player's need to push back harder to fill the leading lanes, something Geelong and Sydney seem to always do well
Don't see AFL giving us 2 additional rookie spots but we live in hope.
We should, he's got a lot more to offer than Tom Cole in the back line.We should be going after Starcevich surely?
Looks like the clubs are powerless and can't get rid of Mama Kane, she dominates Dillon and she's absolutely useless.Depends if the AFL are genuine about their want for greater numbers of Indigenous players in the game at the top level.
SA and WA have greater numbers of Indigenous kids playing in their states, many of which are very slight in build and need more developmental time in a Club System before their bodies are ready for the rigours at the top level.
Seems like a perfectly reasonable idea to allow an additional 2 spots on our rookie list, too specifically be used on our NGA Indigenous kids.
Look at the squad for the Indigenous game against Fremantle last weekend where close on 65 % of those players came from WA or SA, thats where the talent pool is most prevalent and where great developmental policy and measures are required.
The AFL has no problems allowing anomalies in list eligibility , player access and numbers when they address the issues of developing the Game in the Northern States.
The AFL are very selective and fickle as too when and / or where they are stand on issues of equity.
George Orwell would have been a forward thinker for AFL policy around equality.
It's a pity that Mama Kane isn't as committed and proactive with her assistance measures to improve the uptake of Indigenous numbers in the AFL, as she is to her beloved North Melbourne, where her level of benevolence is on a scale thats unprecedented.
100% agree with all your thoughts.Depends if the AFL are genuine about their want for greater numbers of Indigenous players in the game at the top level.
SA and WA have greater numbers of Indigenous kids playing in their states, many of which are very slight in build and need more developmental time in a Club System before their bodies are ready for the rigours at the top level.
Seems like a perfectly reasonable idea to allow an additional 2 spots on our rookie list, too specifically be used on our NGA Indigenous kids.
Look at the squad for the Indigenous game against Fremantle last weekend where close on 65 % of those players came from WA or SA, thats where the talent pool is most prevalent and where great developmental policy and measures are required.
The AFL has no problems allowing anomalies in list eligibility , player access and numbers when they address the issues of developing the Game in the Northern States.
The AFL are very selective and fickle as too when and / or where they are stand on issues of equity.
George Orwell would have been a forward thinker for AFL policy around equality.
It's a pity that Mama Kane isn't as committed and proactive with her assistance measures to improve the uptake of Indigenous numbers in the AFL, as she is to her beloved North Melbourne, where her level of benevolence is on a scale thats unprecedented.
We could also make the harsh decision and delist a player under contract like LangdonJust on the composition of our list and the changes we are likely or need to make before the end of the year that might impact delistings
As you say we are now a full book with 37 main, 5 rookie and 2 cat-b listed players
• Dewar will have been on the rookie list for 3 years at the end of the season and has to be upgraded to the main list if we retain him (which appears likely on preseason form)
• Sheed will be put on the inactive list at some point and eventually retired by season’s end. Potentially he’ll be replaced with a SSP signing in the next two days which currently seems unlikely. That will mean we probably use a pick in the MSD and given it’s probably an early (top 5) pick it’s a good chance the player will be on an 18 month contract (to 2026)
That gives us the same list split (37/5/2) and 15 players out of contract with Sheed already delisted
I’d be confident Allen, Kelly, Hutchinson and Dewar will be offered new contracts at some point
If we are to bring in the following as you’ve suggested :
Trade - Warner and Warner
Draft - Midfielder (Swans R1), KPD (Hawks R1), Ruck (WC R2)
NGA and F/S - Banfield, Walley, Evans, Caton
(That list doesn’t include Starcevich who we may well be keen on as a FA)
Then only 2 of the following 11 can be retained :
Hunt, Cripps, Chesser, Petruccelle, Cole, Bazzo, Rawlinson, Champion, Livingstone, Jamieson and Brock
That’s a brutal list cull with only Jamieson and Rawlinson being obvious delistees. Some may also add Petruccelle and Livingstone to that pair. And Chesser I guess
I’d be more inclined to ask for Sydney’s F1 than their R1 and forgo drafting a mid since we’d have the two Warners and Banfield coming in as mids
Evans and Caton will both need very good draft years to justify us moving players on to create the necessary list spots
We may look at delisting/drafting players like BWilliams, Barnett or Brockman depending on how they perform this year as an alternative to delisting one or more of those out of contract players
I don’t envy Matt Clarke at all - he has some really big calls to make
Asking the AFL for two additional rookie list spots is almost a no brainer :
• We have a unique reserves setup and struggle to attract talent to our WAFL team so two additional AFL spots will help development of our squad
• Along with Fremantle, we travel significantly more than the other 16 clubs so having two extra players on our squad gives us additional depth to cover the increased risk of injury that travel exposes us to
• Two additional rookie list spots has minimal impact on the rest of the competition but gives us two extra late chances to improve our list
• The AFL could ensure we add indigenous lads as those extra two spots by making them cat b rookies
agree, it would have to come from maybe Brockman or Flynn?We could also make the harsh decision and delist a player under contract like Langdon
We could also make the harsh decision and delist a player under contract like Langdon
Starcevich in Petch out both RFA so Petch FA compo might be reduced but makes our team better.Starcevich would be a good addition, but if we recruit him we must retain Oscar.
We can't have a situation where FA Oscar out, FA Starcevich in and crappy R2 FA compo in.
I think the Harry Edwards naysayers are going to be very quiet come about midway through this season.