- Mar 4, 2002
- 16,331
- 43,200
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Red Sox, Melbourne Storm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prior to your response, I had already read the majority of that UK ... week 38 report.
And when making my way through the reports' usual junk propaganda, I saw that paragraph with the estimate of cases and deaths saved from vaccines, and thought ??? who would be gullible enough to believe those ridiculous numbers ... Thanks for answering that question for me.
During the period in which vaccinations have been pushed in the UK, some 9 months or so, the UK has had about 7 million covid-19 cases. Over half of those have came about after the UK was at least 50% fully vaxxed (in the past 3 or 4 months).
Already having a general understanding of those stats, I thought, who in their right mind would believe any covid-19 study or reports trying to sell junk science that those numbers would be about 4 times higher without vaccinations?
The UK already has one of the highest infection per capita rates in the world and an extremely high number of people already carrying antibodies (who have not been vaxxed) ... or did you fail to read that paragraph just above which stated natural antibodies in 18.9% of the population?
If you still believe those numbers, try to show me just one place in the world that would support that theory of low vaccinations resulting in 3 or 4 times the number of expected cases.
Once again, real world data simply does not match up to these ridiculous "science based" models that are continually being shown to be wrong, yet still used to support the false narratives of the gullible and corrupt.
Given your clear belief you are well qualified, and had actually dismissed the UK paper I linked.
Then why don’t you educate all of us about the specific failings of the analysis and offer an in-depth critique of its short comings.
Otherwise your commentary above, is completely self serving, and a poor and transparent attempt to malign data, that contradicts the unsophisticated calculations in your earlier post.
More strawman arguments ... as expected.
I just gave evidence of specific failings of that report and invited you to give real world examples of where a lack of mass vaccinations have increased cases and deaths ... a challenge you choose to avoid ... for a good reason.
My earlier post simply shows another real world example of how NSW and VIC official health data shows little evidence that mass vaccinations in those states have been effective at reducing deaths (as demonstrated by the CFR numbers). Likewise my post about your strawman reference to ridiculous estimates is not supported by real world data.
If you wish to negate my position on both posts, try to go and find some real world data to support your position.
And a reminder, I generally will not bother wasting everybodies time responding to your strawman arguments in the future.
View attachment 1274978
Hopefully this is true. No surprise these companies have been caught lying yet again, Nothing but a bunch of criminals all of them.
You need to look up the meaning of Strawman arguments.
You’re argument is completely speculative, and I’m asking you for a more detailed critique of the study, that gives us all some substance, given you understands stats.
Alternatively, link a third party analysis that exposes the deficiencies in the UK study that supports your claims.
It’s a simple request.
It’s interesting. What if you held out and only get the first 2 jabs in 2022. Are you considered fully vaccinated after the second dose. Or have to wait six more months to be “fully vaccinated” with your third?
Conspiracy theorists are just so gullible. It's amazing to watch.Jesus christ dude
No, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Was Not Arrested, Here’s How This Conspiracy Theory Emerged
A website called the Conservative Beaver claimed that Bourla was arrested on November 5 and that there was a "media blackout" of the event. But what's the evidence that this actually happened?www.forbes.com
Conservative Beaver - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
Stop bagging Fauci. He is a lifelong public servant who was at the forefront of the US response to AIDS.
He has served under many Republican presidents and knows more about epidemiology than fake internet accounts.
It's embarrassing to attack people of science.History will lampoon internet warriors who are attacking health officials.
Pot kettle and all that. It's been amazing to watch and listen to govt and msm brain washed gullible sheep. Actually no it's been very sad.Conspiracy theorists are just so gullible. It's amazing to watch.
Conspiracy theorists are just so gullible. It's amazing to watch.