Harvey played for 21 years. How could Crawf be any more deserving? The fact that Harvs was close so many times only reiterates just how unfortunate he was to miss out.and archer looked the exact same way. the difference is, Archer was seen as a "tough guy" when he could of easily been seen as a thug. there was little difference between him and pickett in terms of "toughness"
why is harvey more deserving? it frustrates me when people say crap like that. Crawford was just as, if not more deserving. people say Harvey carried the saints, but the saints always had a decent midfield, decent forward line, just couldnt click, from 1997 through to 2004 hawthorn had crawford and thats it.