Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Even the most contentious decision, the play on call in the dying minutes was ticked off as correct call on the umps report card by the guy who analyses the games for the AFL/umpires dept. (I know the guy that reviews for them).The 50 against Markov was there unfortunately. The umpire called 'stand' and markov ran backwards
The non-50 to Cox was horrible though
The rule is ****ed. You take a step backwards behind the mark and your penalised. That is just ****ed to begin with. Markov was backing up before he was told to stand still and had momentum. That does not warrant copping a goal in any game let alone a gf. The rules are ****ed. The umpire had to go hang on he's moving back let him stop and I'll tell him where the mark is. Rather than watch him moving back and saying stop. Serious.The 50 against Markov was there unfortunately. The umpire called 'stand' and markov ran backwards
The non-50 to Cox was horrible though
The cox one is also ****ed because one year you had to be outside protected area the next you can be right beside the kicker. If someone is in your blindspot you are ****ed. The cox one was less controversial for mine.The rule is ****ed. You take a step backwards behind the mark and your penalised. That is just ****ed to begin with. Markov was backing up before he was told to stand still and had momentum. That does not warrant copping a goal in any game let alone a gf. The rules are ****ed. The umpire had to go hang on he's moving back let him stop and I'll tell him where the mark is. Rather than watch him moving back and saying stop. Serious.
We've had decades of bad luck - 1964, 1966, 1970, 1977, 1979, 1981, 2018, Greening, Millane, etc........We were due for some bad luck.
The gods were protecting us on GF day when Naicos bent his knee awkwardly.
Debt collection?
True, before this we had decades of good luck. The tides have turned again. Good luck is back.We've had decades of bad luck - 1964, 1966, 1970, 1977, 1979, 1981, 2018, Greening, Millane, etc........
I think we've had more than our fair share of bad luck.We were due for some bad luck.
The gods were protecting us on GF day when Naicos bent his knee awkwardly.
Debt collection?
Lol. I don't think Blues & Bombers issues stem from bad luck.True, before this we had decades of good luck. The tides have turned again. Good luck is back.
Look at Essendon and Carlton.
Cycles
We've had decades of bad luck - 1964, 1966, 1970, 1977, 1979, 1981, 2018, Greening, Millane, etc........
Prelim probably right. His qualifying final game is being exaggerated. Two goals in the third but his first half was poor.
Hopefully the trend of apparent good luck results in the club finding some talented young key position players at both ends sooner rather than later. No doubt there are doubts about Murphy going forward & Jeremy Howe must be getting close to the end while we all know the current problems in relation to the 2 key forward positions. Alternatively, some creative & left-of-centre trading & recruiting might be able to secure a similar outcome. Touch wood. Goodbye & good luck.True, before this we had decades of good luck. The tides have turned again. Good luck is back.
Look at Essendon and Carlton.
Cycles
I am still on cloud 9 too, but want to see back to back. Once the new season starts 2023 fades pretty quickly.Sorry, I'm still riding the high of a fresh premiership
Probably will be for the next 5 years at least.
I tend to agree. If the new season starts and we have a few losses the gloss wears off a bit even though they cannot take this off us. I hate the thought of September coming around next year and they are crowning a new premier like the farking Blues.I am still on cloud 9 too, but want to see back to back. Once the new season starts 2023 fades pretty quickly.
The 50 against Markov was there unfortunately. The umpire called 'stand' and markov ran backwards
The non-50 to Cox was horrible though
Krak done his in a praccy game in early 2012 and returned by finals to kick 4 against Hawthorn in the qualifying final. Each individual is different. One thing is for sure is that he'll have the best person to guide him through in Wadey and let him know if a 2024 return is possible
Can't be bothered reading too far back in this thread, but just want to mention that we have lost any real use of the first two years of McStay thanks to his injuries, and at 28 now he is only getting older every year. He will be 29 next year with three years left on his contract. Huge blow to our repeat premiership chances in my opinion and also puts him in a category of players we hoped to largely put behind us - those who succumb to one injury after another.
What did they say about the cox play? To me that is far worse.
It's heart-breaking when a key player is gone for the season by the 2nd day of training, particularly after he missed the GF, with a possession-less blanket deemed his only real replacement option.Any injury is a difficulty we need to work through. Got through McStay, Howe and Lipinski missing early this year.
What did they say about the cox play? To me that is far worse.
Time to put Teakle to the test.
It's heart-breaking when a key player is gone for the season by the 2nd day of training, particularly after he missed the GF, with a possession-less blanket deemed his only real replacement option.
McStay's a more devastating loss than the others you mentioned - at least those players saw some footy early and made it back into the team later in the season. The only salvaging factor would be if Johnson or Kreuger can capably fill his spot this season.