• Please read this post on the rules on BigFooty regarding posting copyright material, including fair dealing rules. Repeat infringements could see your account limited or closed.

David Evans press conference to release findings of internal investigation

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
He seems to be building a media profile for himself, probably partly on the back of current circumstances.



What a conceited, dishonest, or at the very least grossly ill informed ****head. He straight away attacked Reimers character in an attempt to discredit and was fundamentally wrong in his position.

I don't see how any Bombers fan could support him.
read what I said again and apply it to the bolded bit...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From a PR/spin standpoint Evans came across as a very good media performer.

But major questions still remain and there is still a huge stench around Windy Hill and what went on there.

Interesting to note that he didn't guarantee that anyone's position is safe (Hird included).
 
Who seems blasé? Evans? Hird? Stop talking shit.
When the club is trying to say they've done nothing wrong but are injecting players with a substance that has not yet been approved for therapuetic use, then they are being blasé, because quite simply they didn't care for all of last year and are only doing so now because of the ASADA investigation and they all look like losing their jobs.

Essendon FC failed in its duty of care to its players and personally when the players get suspended I'm going to enjoy watching the civil lawsuit against Essendon, Hird, Dank & co for millions in loss of income and loss of future income which will bankrupt the lot of them.

blasé [ˈblɑːzeɪ]
adj
1. indifferent to something because of familiarity or surfeit
 
The very fact that there is so far no outrage whatsoever from Essendon fans even after the release of this shambolic "Independent investigation" suggest that they probably wouldn't mind a coverup. I have quickly read this report and it looks like what essendon is claiming (more like suggesting I know) is this:

Dank was not reporting to anyone, no one could overrule Danks (+ the weapon), 2-3 people responsible for every decision, no sole decision maker in whole club apart from Dank, Dank hid all info, Dank convinced us it was all within WADA rules, Dank pushed us to release funds for offsite injections, Dank pushed Coach Hirdy to inject himself etc etc.

I hope some in media see through this.

Just checked the newspapers this morning. Almost everyone is slamming them. I think Hird & Robson did themselves no favor by coming late to the press conference yesterday. Quite a few people questioning that. Not the smartest tools in the shed. Flame the fire :D
 
I find great heart in the fact that, as the club has had pharmacology experts advising the club for 3 months, Evan's is steadfast in his belief that players have not been administered any prohibited substances & stressed that again at the presser.

que but but but, internet detectives know better blah blah blah


Oh yeah, and we have a letter saying it 's fine to use AOD.... But we can't find it anymore. Not that we used it, but just in case we did use the cases of the stuff we ordered from Charters through Dank we have the OK to do so. Oh, and our well esteemed doctor of over 20 years wrote us a letter about his concerns...but we can't find that letter either and he never spoke to Hird about his concerns, even though he's known him since he's a kid. Oh and we can't find the person responsible for overlooking the players in this mess as we don't know who it is. Yeah right on, nothing here stupid public, move on. The AFL will do the rest of the sweeping up.
 
I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he was initially part of the panel when this story broke and I couldn't understand why he'd not been pulled from the show, seeing as he was subjected to questions he couldn't answer.

Now he can answer them, but chose to play dumb by saying he hasn't read the report, nor seen the press conference.

Then when prompted by Robbo about the findings he says something like "ahh, yeah, that's sounds about right".

At a time when everyone is wanting answers he decides(or the club advises) to act like he's been out of town and doesn't know that this is serious shit.

You'd hope that he was playing this out as he saw fit and not with any guidance from the EFC.


I love it when Bomber adopts the "just waiting for a mate" type persona.
 
In general I prefer to blame incompetence then conspiracy. People are just too stupid.

But reaching and down and putting on a tin foil cap.

Q. Why does the report not make it clear who was at fault? Was that not it's aim.

A. The person at fault is the golden haired demi god whose name cannot be taken in vain.

Q. Why is nobody going to be sacked before the ASADA report is out? Afterall it is about Essendon management failures not the doping.

A. Sacked people are harder to control when they give evidance to ASADA. Keep them in the tent and stay on message.

Q. Why was Dank and Robinson not interviewed? They appear to be the escape goats, not interviewing them gives them, in particular Robinson a perfect claim of lack of due process.

A. Manufacted torts are an old trick for paying somebody off. You even get your insurer to foot the bill.

Takes off tin foil cap

Mind you the report was fairly savage for the kind of report it is. The big gaps about where the buck stops may appear in the main report we have not seen.
 
In general I prefer to blame incompetence then conspiracy. People are just too stupid.

But reaching and down and putting on a tin foil cap.

Q. Why does the report not make it clear who was at fault? Was that not it's aim.

A. The person at fault is the golden haired demi god whose name cannot be taken in vain.

Q. Why is nobody going to be sacked before the ASADA report is out? Afterall it is about Essendon management failures not the doping.

A. Sacked people are harder to control when they give evidance to ASADA. Keep them in the tent and stay on message.

Q. Why was Dank and Robinson not interviewed? They appear to be the escape goats, not interviewing them gives them, in particular Robinson a perfect claim of lack of due process.

A. Manufacted torts are an old trick for paying somebody off. You even get your insurer to foot the bill.

Takes off tin foil cap

Mind you the report was fairly savage for the kind of report it is. The big gaps about where the buck stops may appear in the main report we have not seen.
You should put your tin foil hat on more often...
 
In general I prefer to blame incompetence then conspiracy. People are just too stupid.

But reaching and down and putting on a tin foil cap.

Q. Why does the report not make it clear who was at fault? Was that not it's aim.

A. The person at fault is the golden haired demi god whose name cannot be taken in vain.

Q. Why is nobody going to be sacked before the ASADA report is out? Afterall it is about Essendon management failures not the doping.

A. Sacked people are harder to control when they give evidance to ASADA. Keep them in the tent and stay on message.

Q. Why was Dank and Robinson not interviewed? They appear to be the escape goats, not interviewing them gives them, in particular Robinson a perfect claim of lack of due process.

A. Manufacted torts are an old trick for paying somebody off. You even get your insurer to foot the bill.

Takes off tin foil cap

Mind you the report was fairly savage for the kind of report it is. The big gaps about where the buck stops may appear in the main report we have not seen.
In about a week they will have a Ziggy report into the Ziggy report to show the members there was no bias in it. It will keep the masses happy and Evans will have more confidence in the result afterwards.
 
In about a week they will have a Ziggy report into the Ziggy report to show the members there was no bias in it. It will keep the masses happy and Evans will have more confidence in the result afterwards.


Please refer to it correctly as "The Switkowski firewall"

Forever more, when persons associated with this sordid saga are questioned on this matter they will simply decline, point and reply, "the matter was fully addressed in the Switkowski firewall"

Spin 101
 
Please refer to it correctly as "The Switkowski firewall"

Forever more, when persons associated with this sordid saga are questioned on this matter they will simply decline, point and reply, "the matter was fully addressed in the Switkowski firewall"

Spin 101
As preached by Travis Cloke
They're pretty straight to their word; they don't talk a lot of smoke and shadows behind the windows
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

And that the club believe the players didnt take WADA banned supplements. Happy days

When we are not allowed to post on the EFC board why do we have to put up with these ramblings on a daily basis. Why don't you take the same stance as the rest of the club

la la la.jpg
 
Yep, that 2 expert pharmacologists have reviewed all supplements and deemed them safe for use. Although Jenny seems to know the list. I wonder why she won't post them

I think you may want to revise this opinion based on the Herald Sun quotes from one of the experts in question.
 
Not at all. They gave the experts a list which included more supplements than they now know were used.

Why don't you read what the expert says? Hardly re-assuring if you're an Essendon supporter.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/tea...s-took-last-year/story-e6frf9l6-1226636357628

"They approached me to provide a framework on what stage of approval they were at, and what experience of them there was in humans.
"I am a pharmaceutical person with knowledge of drug development and regulatory pathways. I have no idea who took what and who didn't. I never entered into those discussions."
McKinnon said the data concerning anti-obesity drug AOD-9604 suggested it "would have problems with the (WADA) code".
"The code is quite clear. It falls on the individuals to ensure you are not in breach of it," McKinnon said.
"From a drugs perspective, if something hasn't been approved for human use, we shouldn't be going anywhere near it."
 
Not at all. They gave the experts a list which included more supplements than they now know were used.
All you guys care about is finding a legal loophole, the well being of your playing group is insignificant and I think this is quite indicative of how you ended up in this mess in the first place. Win at all costs regardless of the fallout, you may get away with this however I think the heavies from WADA flying in last week is a sign that you wont. Either way EFC is tarnished as cheats along with your coaching staff and will be for a long time.
 
All you guys care about is finding a legal loophole, the well being of your playing group is insignificant and I think this is quite indicative of how you ended up in this mess in the first place. Win at all costs regardless of the fallout, you may get away with this however I think the heavies from WADA flying in last week is a sign that you wont. Either way EFC is tarnished as cheats along with your coaching staff and will be for a long time.
How many times does Evans have to say the supplements are considered safe? Why would AD back him if he was lying?
 
How many times does Evans have to say the supplements are considered safe? Why would AD back him if he was lying?


I havent heard any report of AD backing the safety and not everyone agrees

The AFL Players' Association last night slammed Essendon for compromising the health of its players.
"No AFL player should ever go to work in an environment which can be described as 'pharmacologically experimental'," AFLPA chief Matt Finnis said. "The players have demonstrated enormous loyalty to one another and also to their club - but I think what we have got to look at is (whether) that loyalty is deserved."
 
Oh yeah, and we have a letter saying it 's fine to use AOD.... But we can't find it anymore. Not that we used it, but just in case we did use the cases of the stuff we ordered from Charters through Dank we have the OK to do so. Oh, and our well esteemed doctor of over 20 years wrote us a letter about his concerns...but we can't find that letter either and he never spoke to Hird about his concerns, even though he's known him since he's a kid. Oh and we can't find the person responsible for overlooking the players in this mess as we don't know who it is. Yeah right on, nothing here stupid public, move on. The AFL will do the rest of the sweeping up.
When you put it like that...
 
How many times does Evans have to say the supplements are considered safe? Why would AD back him if he was lying?
God you are naive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top