Disagree that Anthony is more of a third tall. I definitely think he is best suited to FF or CHF. I think he is a player that benefits from being the prime target and getting alot of delivery at FF - more opportunities (at CHF too if he ever gets played there). As a third tall I think he'd get alot less opportunities and suffer for it.
If he got played in a pocket it poses some troublesome structure issues too. I see Medhurst as our third tall forward. I think if you played them both - one in either pocket - we would really lack a crumbing forward. Medhurst is more of a present and mark forward, a bit opportunistic but not a true crumber. It means our forward line would be very tall too, which I think would seriously affect our forward line defensive pressure.
I think Anthony could go ok as a third tall but I don't think it suits his game the best and I don't think it fits well with our other players and their strengths. Not to mention the structure issues.
I think Medhurst best position is HFF, has no problem kicking them from 45 -50m and has a great field kick on him.
A forward line of
FFick/Davis Rusling/Dawes JA
HF:Medhusrt Cloke Thomas/Didak
is fine it isn't any more top heavy then Brisbanes 01-04 team set up.
Cloke plays a very high CHF which allows JA, Dawes ect to lead into the space he leaves behind.
Rusling should always be used out of the goal square it's where he looks the best and is most dangerous.
What will cause top heavyness is if the coaches insist on playing a ruckmen forward in conjunction with our talls.