Demons linked to Dank

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well it's the same stuff he used at Essendon - AOD9604, so obviously nothing to see there either eh?
I thought there was something else he mentioned using at Essendon that was a bit iffy. Cant remember the name of it. Read it in another thread. Either way the whole story is probably just a load of crap blown out of proportion.
 
Essendon now have a solid defence, if Melbourne's using them their clearly not performance enhancing.

I would've thought the second half to our season already did. This is merely a repeat result and the confirmation!!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Interesting that in the ASADA letter to Dank (dated 4 March 2013), requesting an interview, no mention was made of Melbourne.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2013/s3720124.htm


The report on tonight's 7.30 program (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-18/text-messages-reveal-danks-demons-involvement/4637954) indicated "The messages begin in mid-2012 when Dank offered his services to Bates."

So this contact would have occurred when it appears Dank was under active investigation by the ACC.
Curious this is the first mention of it.


That's because dank doesn't want Melbourne on his cv.
 
I actually feel sick. Last thing Melb needs is anything like this.

Actually worried for game at moment too.

Theres No winners here.
Pretty sick of the media coverage and hysteria generally in AFL. I used to feel guilty for spending so much time following AFL but it's easier to not follow now with the ridiculous state of affairs.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yep. Something like Thymosin??? Not approved for human use I think?

Thymodulin, aka the calves blood used at Manly.

Apparently has approval for human theraputic use in Italy, so passes under S0 of WADA.

However, it's a family of six peptides, so S2.5 is looking interesting.
 
Oh dear.

Patrick Keane@AFL_PKeane
59s
After story on ABC 7.30 Report this evening regarding Stephen Dank and Melbourne FC, AFL has tonight issued a statement:

Patrick Keane@AFL_PKeane
10s
"In February, Melbourne provided the AFL with an explanation on club involvement with Dank. This matter has remained open.. . . .

Patrick Keane@AFL_PKeane
11s
""The AFL not previously aware of claims broadcast tonight and these will form part of ongoing investigations by ASADA and the AFL

Patrick Keane@AFL_PKeane
9s
"AFL urgently seeking further explanation from Melb FC about claims/ how they reconcile with previous public /private statements from club."
 
Is there anyone left at Melbourne to face the presser?

They are either sacked or suspended :oops:

**** it. They should be.

I'm voting against the board come the AGM. I'm done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top