local said:A pupil of mine. Yes. Big footy will be his calling.
Ah yes! The BF Force is strong in this one.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
local said:A pupil of mine. Yes. Big footy will be his calling.
GOALden Hawk said:Serious question - does he actually 'manage' anyone other than his sons?
sorry just sounded like you were very interested in Jason Cloke.afc9798 said:I said "a club" not 'my club'
local said:He only manages his sons. But he is open to manage other players, if any are interested.
crackers57 said:Do you know this for a fact?
local said:I'm sure he said that. Start of the year when he was being interviewed by SEN about Travis. He said he will manage all 3 of his sons and possible others if they met the right criteria’s.
It was along those lines.
Falchoon said:we'll take Jason, just so Hamill doesn't have to play on him.
Interesting though that he's only played 2 games and one of them he dominated an inform Hamill.
Helps with the conspiracy theory, though Malthouse does have a history with out of favour players, Betheras and Mullins coming to mind. He can be a stubborn git.
local said:He only manages his sons. But he is open to manage other players, if any are interested.
UNIT said:Theres gonna be a running of the bulls in Pamplona to take him up on that isnt there...
While I would have liked to have kept Rupert and still can’t believe he didn’t play in he 2003 GF no one else picked him up. Mullins didn't play because he wasn't ready and/or not good enough. A better example would have been Scotland who was ripped off. The problem Jason has is that Collingwood have had a fit and stable back 6 that have been performing very well. He isn’t going to replace Wakelin, Presti or Clement and Maxwell has deserved to keep his place. That leaves Cloke without a place. Given the forward injuries and the reality of our ladder position I'd play him in the backline for the rest of the year and move Maxwell and Clement around but MM doesn't do that sort of thing.Falchoon said:Helps with the conspiracy theory, though Malthouse does have a history with out of favour players, Betheras and Mullins coming to mind. He can be a stubborn git.
mudshake said:How weak are McGuire & Malthouse. Giving in to the demands of a demented father & manager. They shouldve called his bluff cos probably no one would want his kids. I spoke to someone down at Richmond about 2 years ago & was told that they wouldnt mind taking on the kids as players but werent prepared to take on the parents. Seems like a good move to me.
romanwfw said:i hope their backline gets smashed tonight. very very weak decision by mickey and ed
bikini babe said:Damir gambled on mick and eddie having as little character as the average collingwood supporter.
Of course, he was right.
How do Collingwood supporters feel about their weak, timmid and gutless selection committee? Does this reflect the character of all Collingwood supporters?
Me thinks: Yes.
romanwfw said:hey mate! not a good weekend coming up huh? england will get smashed and crawl back into thier little hole for another 2years and so will collingwood!
romanwfw said:at least we'll win this weekend
well, we should
eddiesmith said:The stupidity of BigFooty poster seems to become worse and worse by the day
itsintheblood said:Gee England are flying in the cricket aren't they?? 5 for 21 was just brilliant work.