Double Standards?

Remove this Banner Ad

May 10, 2004
24,853
5,691
The Mothership
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Pistons/Hammers/Sri Lanka/The Exers
Heres a response I put in an old thread called 'Are the Aussie cricketers whingers?' from a while back. I think the thread, and my post here are quite appropriate in the current climate....

crownie said:
i think that sums up some of the players well, but i dont find nothing wrong with that because it means they are serious and want to win.

i would prefer the Australian cricket team to have same arrogance about them, its probaly won them some games other teams would never win.

every country has its whingers and sore losers, but everything Australia does gets magnified.


Are you kidding me?

Mark Waugh/Shane Warne betting scandal...excuses made, token fines, swept under the carpet

Brett Lee chucking investigation...again, denied then swept under the carpet, despite the fact hes as much of a chucker as Shoaib Ahktar.

Shane Warne drugs scandal...again, every excuse under the sun made, and it hasnt tainted his image in any way shape or form, it was just 'Warney being Warney', a stupid yobbo mistake at worst.

Lets face it, Aussies have a rep for being easy going, but anyone whos played even a simple game of backyard cricket against them knows Aussies are the sorest losers going around (and ungracious winners too). I've played with Poms, Pakis, Sri Lankans, Indians, Jaapies, and they all like to cheat if they can get away with it, at any level of the game. But no one gets as high and mighty or indignant about it when they get caught out as the Aussies do.

I know i'm tipping the bucket on the Australian side like its going out of style here, but i can tell you, I have alot of respect for the mental toughness and confidence in their own ability that they display on the paddock. You can't play a good session here and there against Australia and expect to win a test match against them. You've got to be up for 5 full days of combat or you will get wiped. The fact that other countries have not more fully exploited the Aussies inability to cop a bit for their own corner is entirely their own fault. The Australians know teams cant sustain it and play accordingly (admittedly this is what cost them the Ashes last year). What is particularly galling is that I do not believe this Australian side needs to resort to the sorts of bullying tactics they do to maintain the same level of success.

I'm just as ticked, if not moreso, with the Australian off field attitude as I am with their on feild persona. They think they are the custodians of everything thats 'pure and right' in the game, even tho they themselves arent opposed to bending the rules when it suits them.

And you know, they've been like this long before any of us were even an itch in our daddy's pants. I give you 'Bodyline'....

70 years later, Aussie cricket fans are still bleating about England coming over here and not playing within 'the spirit of the rules' during this series (hell we even made a mini series about it). Bottom line is, it was a brilliant tactical move, that WAS within the rules, made by a calculating skipper who had the right weapons for the right pitches, was able to implement it and the Aussies werent good enuff to handle it. So they cry like big sissy girls. You know whats funny? I reckon the Australians were just pissed off they didnt think of it themselves. Nothing has changed since then.

Just so you all know, i'm a born and bred Aussie (and so are my parents, and their parents) who's proud of his heritage and has watched cricket for more than 30 years. There are no sour grapes involved. I've loved watching some of Australia's best on an individual level (how could anyone not be capitvated by a fiery Dennis Lillee spell, Warney slowly catching a batsman in his well crafted web, or Ricky Ponting or Greg Chappell in full flight with the bat?) But as a whole i've never liked them. I follow Sri Lanka, and have done since their first tour here in 84-85. Prior to that i just watched the game without allegiance.

I know Arjuna had (and still has) his moments, but I believe for the most part we have played in 'the spirit of the game' and looked like we are enjoying our cricket in the process. (Please do not respond here with another 'Murali is a cheat' post, it's been done to death.)

Before anyone says anything about an Aussie following Sri Lanka, I get it all the time from my mates, and even my Sri Lankan friends think im insane ;) However, being a Sri Lankan fan has greatly enhanced my enjoyment of the game, despite the fact we have been nowhere near as successful as the Australians.
 
With all due respect, it only takes a 5 minute search of your posts regarding the Australian cricket team to know your thoughts on them. So a thread like this would be expected. It's also hard to take these things seriously when the whole issue is about Harbhajan Singh calling a black man a monkey, and not denying it, but trying to squirm out of it down other avenue's, and as expected, the ICC have done nothing.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

With all due respect, it only takes a 5 minute search of your posts regarding the Australian cricket team to know your thoughts on them. So a thread like this would be expected. It's also hard to take these things seriously when the whole issue is about Harbhajan Singh calling a black man a monkey, and not denying it, but trying to squirm out of it down other avenue's, and as expected, the ICC have done nothing.

I'm not defending Harbhajan or the Indians that's for sure.
 
Are you kidding me?

Brett Lee chucking investigation...again, denied then swept under the carpet, despite the fact hes as much of a chucker as Shoaib Ahktar.

Shane Warne drugs scandal...again, every excuse under the sun made, and it hasnt tainted his image in any way shape or form, it was just 'Warney being Warney', a stupid yobbo mistake at worst.

Lets face it, Aussies have a rep for being easy going, but anyone whos played even a simple game of backyard cricket against them knows Aussies are the sorest losers going around (and ungracious winners too). I've played with Poms, Pakis, Sri Lankans, Indians, Jaapies, and they all like to cheat if they can get away with it, at any level of the game. But no one gets as high and mighty or indignant about it when they get caught out as the Aussies do.

I'm just as ticked, if not moreso, with the Australian off field attitude as I am with their on feild persona. They think they are the custodians of everything thats 'pure and right' in the game, even tho they themselves arent opposed to bending the rules when it suits them.

And you know, they've been like this long before any of us were even an itch in our daddy's pants. I give you 'Bodyline'....

70 years later, Aussie cricket fans are still bleating about England coming over here and not playing within 'the spirit of the rules' during this series (hell we even made a mini series about it).

Warne, yes he came back and yes his public persona was no different. But he copped a suspension and got on with it. He wasn't even caugth with performance enchancing drugs, simply something with the potential to mask them. Performance enhancing drugs would be of real help to a spinner I guess. But, he did something against the rules, was suspended and did his time. Didn't really even bleat about it as much as I thought he would at the time.

Bodyline......most of us that comment on Bodyline are only going off the legend of the whole thing now. We are told about how cricket was a gentleman's game back then, and whilst well within the rules, according to what we are told about the spirit of the game back then it was outside of that. But we are all going on legend and 2nd / 3rd hand information.

Some Australians can be terrible sports, Mundine and Hewitt come straight to mind. But I could rattle off a list for every country involved in international sport.

Sri Lanka have hardly set the world on fire for fair play and good conduct either.

To follow a different country, simply because you don't like a few of the individuals and the way they play the game is bizarre. You're a Geelong follower right? Do you realise most / if not all Geelong players are Australians? Do you harbour the same feelings about Warne's supposed let off towards Gary Ablett? Or is only Australian cricketers born with this bad sports gene? Or just Australians in general, except those that wear blue and white on the football field?

Chooisng who to barrack for in international competition isn't like deciding to choose a footy team because you like the colours, or think their mascot is cool. Without wanting to sound like a redneck, a proud born and bred Australian just choosing a different team like it's club competition is disappointing to say the least.
 
Heres a response I put in an old thread called 'Are the Aussie cricketers whingers?' from a while back. I think the thread, and my post here are quite appropriate in the current climate....




Are you kidding me?

Mark Waugh/Shane Warne betting scandal...excuses made, token fines, swept under the carpet

Brett Lee chucking investigation...again, denied then swept under the carpet, despite the fact hes as much of a chucker as Shoaib Ahktar.

Shane Warne drugs scandal...again, every excuse under the sun made, and it hasnt tainted his image in any way shape or form, it was just 'Warney being Warney', a stupid yobbo mistake at worst.

Lets face it, Aussies have a rep for being easy going, but anyone whos played even a simple game of backyard cricket against them knows Aussies are the sorest losers going around (and ungracious winners too). I've played with Poms, Pakis, Sri Lankans, Indians, Jaapies, and they all like to cheat if they can get away with it, at any level of the game. But no one gets as high and mighty or indignant about it when they get caught out as the Aussies do.

I know i'm tipping the bucket on the Australian side like its going out of style here, but i can tell you, I have alot of respect for the mental toughness and confidence in their own ability that they display on the paddock. You can't play a good session here and there against Australia and expect to win a test match against them. You've got to be up for 5 full days of combat or you will get wiped. The fact that other countries have not more fully exploited the Aussies inability to cop a bit for their own corner is entirely their own fault. The Australians know teams cant sustain it and play accordingly (admittedly this is what cost them the Ashes last year). What is particularly galling is that I do not believe this Australian side needs to resort to the sorts of bullying tactics they do to maintain the same level of success.

I'm just as ticked, if not moreso, with the Australian off field attitude as I am with their on feild persona. They think they are the custodians of everything thats 'pure and right' in the game, even tho they themselves arent opposed to bending the rules when it suits them.

And you know, they've been like this long before any of us were even an itch in our daddy's pants. I give you 'Bodyline'....

70 years later, Aussie cricket fans are still bleating about England coming over here and not playing within 'the spirit of the rules' during this series (hell we even made a mini series about it). Bottom line is, it was a brilliant tactical move, that WAS within the rules, made by a calculating skipper who had the right weapons for the right pitches, was able to implement it and the Aussies werent good enuff to handle it. So they cry like big sissy girls. You know whats funny? I reckon the Australians were just pissed off they didnt think of it themselves. Nothing has changed since then.

Just so you all know, i'm a born and bred Aussie (and so are my parents, and their parents) who's proud of his heritage and has watched cricket for more than 30 years. There are no sour grapes involved. I've loved watching some of Australia's best on an individual level (how could anyone not be capitvated by a fiery Dennis Lillee spell, Warney slowly catching a batsman in his well crafted web, or Ricky Ponting or Greg Chappell in full flight with the bat?) But as a whole i've never liked them. I follow Sri Lanka, and have done since their first tour here in 84-85. Prior to that i just watched the game without allegiance.

I know Arjuna had (and still has) his moments, but I believe for the most part we have played in 'the spirit of the game' and looked like we are enjoying our cricket in the process. (Please do not respond here with another 'Murali is a cheat' post, it's been done to death.)

Before anyone says anything about an Aussie following Sri Lanka, I get it all the time from my mates, and even my Sri Lankan friends think im insane ;) However, being a Sri Lankan fan has greatly enhanced my enjoyment of the game, despite the fact we have been nowhere near as successful as the Australians.

Your three examples are pretty much crap and therefore your whole post is crap.

Warne and Waugh were fined. Issue was dealt with.

Lee is not a chucker and there isn't ANY evidence to suggest he is. Your beleif that he is, shows you know little about cricket.

Warne was suspended for a year and missed the World Cup. No crapping on like India, or Pakistan where they were caught with performanvce enhanicng drugs and let their players off. Where was your inidignation then?

I do agree that I find the hero worship of Warne a bit too much
 
Actually diablo, I'll give you an example of what I eman about the country support issue.

I can't stand Lleyton Hewitt, and don't have a lot of time for Mark Phillipousis either.

I do like Andy Roddick.

If they meet in the Australian Open, when they are there representing themselves, I will be supporting Roddick.

If they were to meet in an Australia v USA Davis Cup tie, I will be barracking for Australia, including cheering for Hewitt through gritted teeth. I don't change nationalities and hope my country loses just because I don't like one of our representatives.
 
Your three examples are pretty much crap and therefore your whole post is crap.

Warne and Waugh were fined. Issue was dealt with.

Lee is not a chucker and there isn't ANY evidence to suggest he is. Your beleif that he is, shows you know little about cricket.

Warne was suspended for a year and missed the World Cup. No crapping on like India, or Pakistan where they were caught with performanvce enhanicng drugs and let their players off. Where was your inidignation then?

I do agree that I find the hero worship of Warne a bit too much

Excatly the point - Warne suspended - Ahktar then let off for roids FFS.

The starting post has no cred at all.
 
I'm not defending Harbhajan or the Indians that's for sure.
Then what point exactly are you trying to make? Because thats what this whole issue is about. Just about all your posts on here about the Australian cricket team is how they can dish it but can't take it. What exactly is it they can't take? Symonds being called a monkey? Nor ****ing should they.
 
Then what point exactly are you trying to make? Because thats what this whole issue is about. Just about all your posts on here about the Australian cricket team is how they can dish it but can't take it. What exactly is it they can't take? Symonds being called a monkey? Nor ****ing should they.

No they shouldn't. However, that does not diminish the fact that the Australians also behaved poorly at many points during the test. I am certain the Aussies had plenty to say out there (not necessarily racist) that was not pleasant, but as always, it is the Australians idea that the other side should 'harden the **** up'.
 
Your three examples are pretty much crap and therefore your whole post is crap.

Warne and Waugh were fined. Issue was dealt with.

Lee is not a chucker and there isn't ANY evidence to suggest he is. Your beleif that he is, shows you know little about cricket.

Warne was suspended for a year and missed the World Cup. No crapping on like India, or Pakistan where they were caught with performanvce enhanicng drugs and let their players off. Where was your inidignation then?

I do agree that I find the hero worship of Warne a bit too much

Ain't watched too many videos of Lee's quicker ball have you?
 
Remember the Rule Change after Murali's Bowling was deemed "Illegal" (so that its now legal) Brett Lee's bowling is within regulations...simple answer to that!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Actually diablo, I'll give you an example of what I eman about the country support issue.

I can't stand Lleyton Hewitt, and don't have a lot of time for Mark Phillipousis either.

I do like Andy Roddick.

If they meet in the Australian Open, when they are there representing themselves, I will be supporting Roddick.

If they were to meet in an Australia v USA Davis Cup tie, I will be barracking for Australia, including cheering for Hewitt through gritted teeth. I don't change nationalities and hope my country loses just because I don't like one of our representatives.

That's your perogative. Why would I want to follow a team when I get no joy out of the way they go about it, whether it's my country or not?

The whole attitude is reflected in this 'We didn't do anything wrong, and even if we did, one of the Indian players called one of our players a monkey and that's all that matters' line being spouted here.

Yes, other countries misbehave and, dare I say it, 'cheat'. Yes, some of them get away with it too. And no, I don't agree with it (Shoaib cheating and then being allowed to walk for example) But this is the point i'm making. You would think the Australian cricket side had never done one wrong thing by the way they, and the fans, carry on. This instance is no exception.

FWIW, I'm a huge Lleyton Hewitt fan. Figure that out ;)
 
No they shouldn't. However, that does not diminish the fact that the Australians also behaved poorly at many points during the test. I am certain the Aussies had plenty to say out there (not necessarily racist) that was not pleasant, but as always, it is the Australians idea that the other side should 'harden the **** up'.

Until the line is crossed, i agree, the other side SHOULD harden the **** up!!!

Once that line is crossed however, its a different story, and as the ICC deemed, that line was crossed by Singh!
 
Although the original posts examples were dealt with, they were still pretty much played down to an extent. If it happened to another country, we'd be jumping up and down pointing the finger blaming them.

We're quick to point the finger at others but when it happens to us, we put up the defences. Not just in cricket, but Olympic sports too.
 
The whole attitude is reflected in this whole 'We didn't do anything wrong, and even if we did, one of the Indian players called one of our players a monkey and that's all that matters' being spouted here.

Yes, other countries misbehave and, dare I say it, 'cheat'. Yes, some of them get away with it too. And no, I don't agree with it (Shoaib cheating and then being allowed to walk for example) But this is the point i'm making. You would think the Australian cricket side had never done one wrong thing by the way they, and the fans, carry on. This instance is no exception.

FWIW, I'm a huge Lleyton Hewitt fan. Figure that out ;)

The attitude that is reflected, is that "We didn't do anything wrong" however they called one of our players a monkey, therefore they did!

Some people just enjoy breaking things down so far, that when they're put back together theres a completely different outcome!!! The Fact of the matter is, whilst Australia DID (and all greats (not only sports do)) Push the boundaries, they never "Cheated" or Broke the Rules. Harbajhan did, and the BCCI are using their Power over the ICC to get this wiped clean, and cover up the overwhelming fact, that their bottom order couldn't survive 12 balls to a couple of part time spinners (they infact all were out in 5 balls)
 
Yep, no problems with that. So it didn't just favour Murali like Aussie fans claim then did it?

There is also no indication that Brett Lee's action would have been illegal according to the previous rules, so infact, you are wrong.

Im afraid to say that this time there are people around to stand up to your sensationalised views
 
See, now you're just trying to confuse me into submission aren't you? :p

Well no, I was also a huge John McEnroe fan as a boy, and Lleyton has nothing on him lol

Seriously tho, I can enjoy individual performances as I mentioned in the original post. However, there has always been a mentality in Australian cricket as a team and as a whole that does not appeal to me. Just because I was born here and live here, doesn't mean I'm just going to blindly follow them. At least Aussie cricket fans aren't telling me to go follow someone else if I don't like their attitude, because I already do :D

I follow Australia and Australians in everything bar International cricket and rugby union (learned how to play the game in NZ and went to the same school as many All Blacks for a while so follow them. Wouldn't pay anywhere near as much attention to the game otherwise), so i'm not totally unpatriotic :thumbsu:


And just to confuse you even more, I follow Geelong, but I don't live there, have never lived there, will never live there, don't have and never have had any family or friends from there, and started following them years before Gazza pulled on the guernsey. And whatsmore, I used to follow Carlton as a boy, and changed the year after they won a flag :p
 
There is also no indication that Brett Lee's action would have been illegal according to the previous rules, so infact, you are wrong.

Im afraid to say that this time there are people around to stand up to your sensationalised views


Would you like to go back and have a look at the tape again?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Double Standards?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top