News Dustin Martin Video

Remove this Banner Ad

imagine being a stripper at a private function rocking up and saying "right o boys no touching at all allowed tonight"

just doesnt happen . they tell you what you can and cant do when you book them
The main no-no is taking pictures
 
I doubt a lot will come of it.

In these situations usually there is history even if unrelated to Dusty

So if some want to throw mud around usually instances can be drawn upon from other parties.

Certain cultures have norms around certain activities and frankly the vision is a non-event in that setting.

In fact if anyone went into a joint and asked a stripper, they would be able to give you the general low down in a non-official capacity
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Love the double standards. Wife was watching some show on ABC other night with an old duck drooling over two Scottish dudes with their tops off. Other way around and its news headlines but fine for ABC otherwise.
Spot on 100 %
 
Why? The club don't need to do anything
because benny gale knows that its the same as when he goes to bunnings and buys a snag, its a service

I'm pretty sure if sauce costs 50c he doesnt squirt it on for free
 
I dunno all the ones my friends have gone to whilst officially having those kinds of policies, money always talks
Don’t disagree, but it’s also the context the video shows,
He approaches from behind when she’s engaged with someone else, reaches around for a handful and slinks off again

At the very least it’s a bad look because she didn’t know he was going to do it or see him approaching

Not saying he should be dragged over the coals or anything just it’s a bad look
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Never been to kittens hey

I have not, but I engaged with one that apparently had a association with them in a different location. This is a few years back when things where a little more earthly shall we say

I touched her in a wilder way than Dusty, she did not mind. Then again everyone is different.

A minder actually joked to me about it.

She invited me to visit her down in Melbourne at one point but never took it up mainly due to the tyranny of distance
 
Last edited:
Justifying what?

Neither you or I know any circumstances around this video.

All you know is that he touched a womens breast who was not wearing a top.

If this offends you then that really is a shame.
whately genuinely resembles a runt baby bird that has been pushed out of the nest and moldered on the footpath for a wet week
I'm sure it was the postman
No way has he GW ever seen a woman naked
Or even touched one allegedly
 
they legally have to turn off the comments to avoid defamation law suits
So did the HS on twitter. Low life scum bags.

As a woman, let me make it clear - I am not accepting what Dusty has done is right, but who are we to take the moral high ground when we do not know the circumstances of the incident. People are assuming, just like the media.

When I lived in Sydney when I was much younger, a few of my close friends were strippers and I can tell you that touching was allowed as long as it was above the waist. The girls knew the rules. The security dudes were watching and if men went below, they were escorted out quickly.

Crucifying Dusty without the full story is playing right into the media's hands. I hope the club pulls it together and bans them all from interviews with all players. This has been an intentional act to upset the club and in particular, Dusty.

I am amazed that anyone was able to video the incident tbh, as there is a strict code due to the privacy issues for some clientele that visit these places. Some would not like what they do made public and the owners of these places are normally strict on this type of thing.

I am not excusing Dusty but lets get some perspective here. I am sure the media wanted this to happen right now for their own selfish reasons.
 
We don’t even know the rules of employment, just because she’s a stripper doesn't mean you can touch what you want, when you want

Most strippers have a zero touch policy and even if they do allow it it’s under pretty strict circumstances
Yeah, like for cash as a good friend of mine would say "No dough, No show" she ran a stripping + agency
 
The Faux Outrage Meter has gone off its **** so to speak.

Really, it can not be any more that anyone, and everyone has, intentionally or unintentionally done something of a similar nature. Here red faced, the HUN chooses to make a relevant "celebrity" accountable for everyone.

Can't see a win for anyone. Can't see a loose. Can see the desperate HUN resorting to British Tabloid tactics in a desperate, shameless cry for relevance. They've taken a memory slide back down to the bad old days of The Truth.

HUN = pfffft.
 
Just regarding Consent / Consensual

I went back and just looked at the video again and noticed just before dusty comes up to her , when approaching Dusty and the lady are making eye contact and he smiles then goes behind her and touches here. Im not too good with tech but i did try to capture this
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (45).png
    Screenshot (45).png
    108.3 KB · Views: 70
No wonder Dusty gives the media nothing they screw him around. From 2015 really did the person who filmed it have permission to and was this woman made aware of it being aired. Being saying it for ages Australia has the worse journalism in the world along with journalists.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Dustin Martin Video

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top