Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
if thats true, that is huge!Let's not be too kind to Craig and co.
I've just been talking to someone close to the scene and they tell me that the back-flip by Craig had nothing to do with what's right or wrong.
Apparently the leadership group approached Craig around 6 to 6 30 pm and told him that the playing group had lost faith in him and the culture of the club as a result of the way that a 320 game legend of the club had been treated.
Craig's re-action apparently was that he could stand losing the supporters, but not the playing group, and as a result approached the Board to endorse a back-flip re the farewell game - which resulted in them accepting the changed recommendation.
Right decision - but not necessarily for the reasons we all originally thought.
Let's not be too kind to Craig and co.
I've just been talking to someone close to the scene and they tell me that the back-flip by Craig had nothing to do with what's right or wrong.
Apparently the leadership group approached Craig around 6 to 6 30 pm and told him that the playing group had lost faith in him and the culture of the club as a result of the way that a 320 game legend of the club had been treated.
Craig's re-action apparently was that he could stand losing the supporters, but not the playing group, and as a result approached the Board to endorse a back-flip re the farewell game - which resulted in them accepting the changed recommendation.
Right decision - but not necessarily for the reasons we all originally thought.
Isn't that a good thing though? I'd rather he react to his playing group rather than the supporters to be honest. He has shown that he does listen to his players - particularly the leadership group. His initial decision was wrong, albeit for justifiable reasons under normal circumstances, no doubt about it. I'm grateful that he wasn't so stubborn (as he is accused of being often in here) as to refuse to budge from his position.
It's incredible though that he managed to get it so very, very wrong the first time around. I'm stunned that it took this much feedback - be it from the fans or from the leadership group - to get him to see the error of his ways.Isn't that a good thing though? I'd rather he react to his playing group rather than the supporters to be honest. He has shown that he does listen to his players - particularly the leadership group. His initial decision was wrong, albeit for justifiable reasons under normal circumstances, no doubt about it. I'm grateful that he wasn't so stubborn (as he is accused of being often in here) as to refuse to budge from his position.
Sometimes you just have to throw out the science, throw out the selection criteria, throw out the principles, and make decisions from the heart. This was clearly one of those times, yet Craig couldn't see that. At this point it's not about golden tickets, it's not about depriving a kid of a game, it's about doing the right thing by the fans - and more importantly about doing the right thing by a player who has given his heart and soul to the club for the last 16 years."In our initial discussion regarding an appropriate exit for Tyson ... we did discuss a farewell game, but when I pulled back to selection criteria and the principles that I use, I was unable to in real terms guarantee that it could actually happen, even though we were keen to try to make it happen to the best of our ability."
Absolutely spot on!!It's incredible though that he managed to get it so very, very wrong the first time around. I'm stunned that it took this much feedback - be it from the fans or from the leadership group - to get him to see the error of his ways.
This has been badly mismanaged by Craig and the Crows hierarchy and there really isn't any defending it.
Dropping Edwards was the right decision. He's been out of sorts all year and it's been sad to see him falling so far from the levels he used to achieve. As you pointed out, this wouldn't have come as a great surprise to Edwards. He would have been receiving feedback for several weeks now warning him that the end was coming - and his game against Brisbane on the weekend was the final straw. You can debate the rights & wrongs of the 2009 list management decisions, but there really isn't any point - the selection committee can't go back 6 months in time, they can only make decisions in the here and now.
Where things went wrong was Craig's refusal to guarantee Edwards a farewell game at home. Neil Craig's quote says it all:
Sometimes you just have to throw out the science, throw out the selection criteria, throw out the principles, and make decisions from the heart. This was clearly one of those times, yet Craig couldn't see that. At this point it's not about golden tickets, it's not about depriving a kid of a game, it's about doing the right thing by the fans - and more importantly about doing the right thing by a player who has given his heart and soul to the club for the last 16 years.
Thankfully, the right decision has been made in the end. Edwards will get his farewell game - and I'm hoping to be there when he receives the standing ovation he so thoroughly deserves. It's galling that it took a player led revolution in order for it to happen.
Apparently the leadership group approached Craig around 6 to 6 30 pm and told him that the playing group had lost faith in him and the culture of the club as a result of the way that a 320 game legend of the club had been treated.
Craig's re-action apparently was that he could stand losing the supporters, but not the playing group, and as a result approached the Board to endorse a back-flip re the farewell game - which resulted in them accepting the changed recommendation.
Apparently the leadership group approached Craig around 6 to 6 30 pm and told him that the playing group had lost faith in him and the culture of the club as a result of the way that a 320 game legend of the club had been treated.
Craig's re-action apparently was that he could stand losing the supporters, but not the playing group, and as a result approached the Board to endorse a back-flip re the farewell game - which resulted in them accepting the changed recommendation.
If this is true... Craigs position is no longer practical. He needs to go.
Jenny - it should not have hit that point. He was so stubborn and inflexible the playing group had to tell him they'd lost faith in him.
If you think that's a good thing I honestly don't know what to say to you.
Not doubting you or your source Macca, but I'd like to hear that confirmed by others. If it is the case, then it's the second time (we know of) that Neil has been rolled by the players this year on pretty significant issues.
Is that a sign of healthy player empowerment and flexibility from the coach? Or the iceberg tip of some serious ructions? I'm halfway to thinking that our onfield issues this year are partly related to some off-field disquiet.
This.
Our club needs a massive cleanout and surprisingly I don't think it's so much the playing list as it is the off field management and coaching panel.
It's incredible though that he managed to get it so very, very wrong the first time around. I'm stunned that it took this much feedback - be it from the fans or from the leadership group - to get him to see the error of his ways.
This has been badly mismanaged by Craig and the Crows hierarchy and there really isn't any defending it.
Dropping Edwards was the right decision. He's been out of sorts all year and it's been sad to see him falling so far from the levels he used to achieve. As you pointed out, this wouldn't have come as a great surprise to Edwards. He would have been receiving feedback for several weeks now warning him that the end was coming - and his game against Brisbane on the weekend was the final straw. You can debate the rights & wrongs of the 2009 list management decisions, but there really isn't any point - the selection committee can't go back 6 months in time, they can only make decisions in the here and now.
Where things went wrong was Craig's refusal to guarantee Edwards a farewell game at home. Neil Craig's quote says it all:
Sometimes you just have to throw out the science, throw out the selection criteria, throw out the principles, and make decisions from the heart. This was clearly one of those times, yet Craig couldn't see that. At this point it's not about golden tickets, it's not about depriving a kid of a game, it's about doing the right thing by the fans - and more importantly about doing the right thing by a player who has given his heart and soul to the club for the last 16 years.
Thankfully, the right decision has been made in the end. Edwards will get his farewell game - and I'm hoping to be there when he receives the standing ovation he so thoroughly deserves. It's galling that it took a player led revolution in order for it to happen.
See, its posts like this that bring out the s word jenny.
A man desperately backtracks to save his job in the face of mutiny, and you praise him for his humility and are grateful for it?
Can't agree
Firstly is there any real evidence of a player led revolution?
Secondly if Craig made a decision which he (or others) thought in retrospect was wrong full credit to him for being brave enough to change his mind. A brave thing to do
Thirdly farewell games are overated. What is the value in them vs a lap of honour before a game from Edwards and family anyway? It is all about the fans paying respect and thanking an Adelaide club great. Doesn't have to play to do that.
The key issue is his retirement is not over shadowed for long by this whole issue. We need him to go out as he deserves.
People make wrong decisions all the time. Even if this was wrong doesn't mean they need to be ripped apart every time. Anyone on this board made a wrong call today? Cut the club and Craig a bit of slack
Only the word of macca23, but that's good enough for me. Macca's sources are far better than those of most people on BigFooty.Firstly is there any real evidence of a player led revolution?
It was a brave decision yes, but not one he should have got wrong in the first place. The right thing to do was obvious, but he didn't see it because he only looked at his selection criteria and principles. He thought with his head, when he should have been thinking with his heart.Secondly if Craig made a decision which he (or others) thought in retrospect was wrong full credit to him for being brave enough to change his mind. A brave thing to do
Maybe... But I think you'd be in the minority this is actually your preference.Thirdly farewell games are overated. What is the value in them vs a lap of honour before a game from Edwards and family anyway? It is all about the fans paying respect and thanking an Adelaide club great. Doesn't have to play to do that.
I'm not calling for Neil Craig's head. They've got it right in the end. Craig made a mistake and it was a whopper. Hopefully he'll learn from it - and I really mean learn, not just use it as one of his cliches - and some of the heart and soul will return to the club as a result.The key issue is his retirement is not over shadowed for long by this whole issue. We need him to go out as he deserves.
People make wrong decisions all the time. Even if this was wrong doesn't mean they need to be ripped apart every time. Anyone on this board made a wrong call today? Cut the club and Craig a bit of slack
Your very colourful description of what you gleaned happened from what Macca23 reported could have a degree of poetic license, don't you think? What if it wasn't a desperate man trying to save his job? What if it was a coach that respects his players input and acted accordingly? I suspect somewhere in the middle lies the truth.
On the flip side what could have happened is that he refused to listen and Edwards gets no farewell game. Everybody's pissed off from players to supporters and that only exacerbates our shit season. I AM grateful that he listened and changed his mind. At the very least he's shown he can be humble in defeat, because that was a very defeated man in that press conference. I might add here that if things don't improve markedly by season's end, I doubt very much that Craig will stay on.