Essendon continues to duck for cover

Remove this Banner Ad

Reality:
As a sign of good faith Adelaide offered up additional picks, Essendon was punished far more heavily.
When comparing the two issues and the punishments handed out Essendon got off very, very lightly and the penalties to the individuals involved are a joke compared to what Trigg and Connolly got.

This is part of the reason that if players are served infraction notices and suspended I want to see Hird run out of the game for good, Essendon to be banned from the first 3 rounds of the next 2 drafts and heavier financial penalties against the others also involved.
 
But there's also nothing different about her article from the last 30 she wrote on the subject.

Pretty much.

Caroline Wilson it appears is working from the Mike Sheahan playbook. She promotes the AFL line, keeps in sweet with those at AFLHQ and in return obtains information from HQ not available to other journalists. We saw the same with North Melbourne in 2007 when she ran a concerted campaign against North when the AFL was trying to persuade the Kangaroos to move to Queensland.
 
Thought it was a good article. At least she keeps it out there....it's never going away Essendon. If you dont like what someone says then they become the brunt of your anger and you find it necessary to diss them and call names, same as the school yard, just a lot of bullying. Harcourt is no fool either, he is chief medical officer of more than the AFL isnt he. He knew what he was saying and it was well timed when it became knowledge here. These people know a lot more than we do, most of it will come out eventually. I understand why Essendon are fighting this, but there is also a time when you need to conceed defeat.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Geez, look, the rest of us don't use Essendon logic so trying to downplay what Essendon did as being simply a matter of "poor governance" will be something no one outside the weird cult of Essendon would ever agree with you on.

The AFL is the one who punished us of that. To this day Essendon is yet to be convicted of doping. You caro and the htb can spin it anyway you want but that's fact
 
The AFL is the one who punished us of that. To this day Essendon is yet to be convicted of doping. You caro and the htb can spin it anyway you want but that's fact
So on the basis that the accused pleads innocent, then they should just drop charges and forget it all happened?

You've just solved the over crowded legal system!!
 
So on the basis that the accused pleads innocent, then they should just drop charges and forget it all happened?

You've just solved the over crowded legal system!!

I'm discussing charges that have already been laid and what the penalties were for.... not what HTB wants them to be.
 
People need to keep this in mind. Whereas some of her opinions at times are a little left field, her information channels are usually on the mark. She would know more about what is going on behind the scenes than anyone here in Big Footy, and maybe most other journalists.

It is ironic during the week a story breaking overseas about how the rest of the world views Austraia when it comes to drugs, and also we are, per capita, the biggest user of so-called "recreation" drugs in the world. Not surprising.

Whether we like this or not, the rest of the sporting world are watching how we handle this. There is far too much external pressure for us to just sweep this under the carpet. Any attempt to support the concept of doping players will not be acceptable to the sporting world, and the ramifications could be severe.

Caro's sources are inside the AFL, that's as obvious as Robbos are from EFC.

The thing is on both sides of the story, the "journos" are used as conduits to the public.

Caro simply pushes the lines the AFL wants her to. For that she's "rewarded" with "information". Same with Robbo.

Thing about this saga is it increasingly enters unchartered areas where nobody really knows what the outcomes will be.

People should keep in mind the obvious bias that exists in the writings of these clowns. They don't get all aspects of the story, not do they make any attempt to.

Caro's fanbois slap "Slobbo" about for his biased rants, then nominate Caro as the bastion of all that is true.

They're both only going with half of the story - at best.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

More of the same crap.

But at least Caro delivers the whack that Bomber deserves. What he said was incredibly dishonest and he should have been called on it immediately. His cancer comment was as rubbish as some of the alarmist nonsense that Caro spews. Two wrongs do make a right apparently.

And Reid and his "good bloke discount". Yes, the article is really nothing new but the farce seemingly needs to be highlighted.
 
TBH it was just another Caro opinion piece. There was nothing new in it that we haven't discussed on the HTB.

The big question is why did she choose to print it now? Maybe it's just a slow news day and they needed to pad out the paper, but at least the online webpage had it second or third story on the main page.

I assume the AFL wanted her to put it out today. Again, why?
 
Caro's sources are inside the AFL, that's as obvious as Robbos are from EFC.

The thing is on both sides of the story, the "journos" are used as conduits to the public.

Caro simply pushes the lines the AFL wants her to. For that she's "rewarded" with "information". Same with Robbo.

Thing about this saga is it increasingly enters unchartered areas where nobody really knows what the outcomes will be.

People should keep in mind the obvious bias that exists in the writings of these clowns. They don't get all aspects of the story, not do they make any attempt to.

Caro's fanbois slap "Slobbo" about for his biased rants, then nominate Caro as the bastion of all that is true.

They're both only going with half of the story - at best.
Pretty much agree with all of that, both sides have an their side, both sides are hiding and pushing one side of the story.
 
TBH it was just another Caro opinion piece. There was nothing new in it that we haven't discussed on the HTB.

The big question is why did she choose to print it now? Maybe it's just a slow news day and they needed to pad out the paper, but at least the online webpage had it second or third story on the main page.

I assume the AFL wanted her to put it out today. Again, why?
I don't think she needs an AFL edict now, she has her own agenda consistent with last yrs agenda. I don't think it's the AFLs agenda anymore to punish the club. The AFL would be wishing it all ended with their sanction.

Caro wants the heads of Hird and Dank
 
Caro's sources are inside the AFL, that's as obvious as Robbos are from EFC.

The thing is on both sides of the story, the "journos" are used as conduits to the public.

Caro simply pushes the lines the AFL wants her to. For that she's "rewarded" with "information". Same with Robbo.

Thing about this saga is it increasingly enters unchartered areas where nobody really knows what the outcomes will be.

People should keep in mind the obvious bias that exists in the writings of these clowns. They don't get all aspects of the story, not do they make any attempt to.

Caro's fanbois slap "Slobbo" about for his biased rants, then nominate Caro as the bastion of all that is true.

They're both only going with half of the story - at best.

You're correct and nobody is denying that.

However you're talking like the AFL has something to gain from trashing one of it's biggest clubs.

Why would they do that if it wasn't the truth?
 
Caro's sources are inside the AFL, that's as obvious as Robbos are from EFC.

The thing is on both sides of the story, the "journos" are used as conduits to the public.

Caro simply pushes the lines the AFL wants her to. For that she's "rewarded" with "information". Same with Robbo.

Thing about this saga is it increasingly enters unchartered areas where nobody really knows what the outcomes will be.

People should keep in mind the obvious bias that exists in the writings of these clowns. They don't get all aspects of the story, not do they make any attempt to.

Caro's fanbois slap "Slobbo" about for his biased rants, then nominate Caro as the bastion of all that is true.

They're both only going with half of the story - at best.

The problem is only one of the two scenarios 'seems legit'. The other is a fantasy land of coincidences and misunderstandings. I don't believe the truth lies half way between. I think the truth is very close to what Caro is writing.
 
You're correct and nobody is denying that.

However you're talking like the AFL has something to gain from trashing one of it's biggest clubs.

Why would they do that if it wasn't the truth?
I don't think the AFL are trying to do that anymore. They got their pound of flesh last yr. I'm convinced they would want this to have ended there.
 
Pretty much.

Caroline Wilson it appears is working from the Mike Sheahan playbook. She promotes the AFL line, keeps in sweet with those at AFLHQ and in return obtains information from HQ not available to other journalists. We saw the same with North Melbourne in 2007 when she ran a concerted campaign against North when the AFL was trying to persuade the Kangaroos to move to Queensland.
Absolutely. She knows where her next meal is coming from. In this instance though I think she is singing from her own sheet music after the bomberz shameless denial that cancer could be an issue for their players in the future as I'm not too sure the AFL want 'cancer' plastered all over the media. Not a good look. They didn't control to exposure of the Harcourt comments and undoubtedly would have done something about it if they know before hand that this info was out there.

The bomberz have built their barricades and are lobbing their PR war grenades from those clear lines of defence to the point of ignoring logic and decency. Caro in this article is simply pointing this out.
 
[QUOTE="I'm convinced they would want this to have ended there.[/QUOTE]

Thats my point

Bunk is implying the AFL are out to "get" Essendon through Caro
 
cue the violins...
yeah we're all a little sick of having to bang our heads against the wall trying to get you guys to understand you did wrong...and your constant blaming of others...we are all OVER IT!
It just means that you are not listening. EFC accepted the sanctions and Little admitted fault. Hird did the same and apologised to the players, the commission and the supporters. What is it that you want? A personal hand delivered apology from Hird and Little?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Essendon continues to duck for cover

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top