Dank would not be need to talk to anyone if Essendon had undertaken a HAZID of their proposed supplements program before it had commenced which would have amongst other things identified some basic program requirements such as the management and retention of all supplements documentation.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Essendon to file Federal Court injunction against ASADA (yes, another one)
- Thread starter Spongebob
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Dank would not be need to talk to anyone if Essendon had undertaken a HAZID of their proposed supplements program before it had commenced which would have amongst other things identified some basic program requirements such as the management and retention of all supplements documentation.
So if the ADVRP find that Essendon have nothing to face, that will take 18-24 months? Not sure about that!
This post doesn't make sense. Think you need to slow down a bit and take it all in.
I think Dank won't talk because he has said he won't talk on numerous occasions.
Miguel Sanchez
(Unique injury) TBC
Wouldn't work. If they were bringing one of those actions for the sole or predominant purpose of getting documents to use in their defence in other proceedings, then (a) it would be an improper use of the Court process, and (b) any documents they obtained would be subject to an implied undertaking not to be used for any other purpose.
- Banned
- #206
Question
Why do you think Dank won't talk? -- FYI 'because he won't' isn't a reason.
Question
Do you think Dank
A - went rogue so we don't know what was administered?
or
B - He's legit and tells the whole truth?
You need it slower?
- Aug 12, 2013
- 10,124
- 11,373
- AFL Club
- GWS
Bomber Thompson even said it on Fc last august.
He{dank}has talked to ACC 3 times and he wont talk to us{EFC}as a matter of fact HE{dank}wont talk to anybody,us,asada,wada,police,anybody.
I guess he is going a little deeper in his questioning.
Why do you think he has said he won't talk?
- Apr 27, 2014
- 6,792
- 10,493
- AFL Club
- Richmond
How can EFC possible say it has abided by the code?!
As I understand it they have opted for a 'Socratic doping defence'....The only thing we know is that we know nothing of what the players were given...
The best of their knowledge is no knowledge at all.
At the risk of stepping in Lawyer-speak, being sure of being unsure is no surety of abidance.
- Jan 3, 2012
- 47,165
- 96,782
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC, Victory, All Blecks,
For when the truth comes out
Is the question: "why do I think Dank doesn't want to talk?". If so:
Clearly there is some self interest involved. Clearly he has been advised not to by his lawyers.
Perhaps he did, in fact, defraud Medicare in some way and does not want to make any statements without being provided with a s128 notice.
I dont know. Neither do you.
Clearly there is some self interest involved. Clearly he has been advised not to by his lawyers.
Perhaps he did, in fact, defraud Medicare in some way and does not want to make any statements without being provided with a s128 notice.
I dont know. Neither do you.
if dank has documents they would constitute the intellectual property of efc, and that could be pursued
Miguel Sanchez
(Unique injury) TBC
Short answer, no.
Long answer - if the matter went as far as a trial, he would probably have to give evidence in his defence if he wanted to have any sort of success in the action. But he could decide for whatever reason not to take the stand.
blackshadow
Hall of Famer
Would this face really inspire you to be forthcoming?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Will that be excluded from the salary cap too?
What a ****ing stupid postyeah I'm sure your team being completely and utterly shit has nothing to do with your disillusionment
Grow up idiot
A poster was making a point about their feelings about the matter, nothing more
Have you actually read it?
They are seeking an injunction restraining the Respondent, ie, ASADA.
Its not exactly ASADA's problem is it. They have issued SC's without Dank.
On the other hand Essendon are sure that their players have not taken banned substances and the only person who can seemingly 100% confirm this is Dank - cause you know, the bombers don't now, don't have records and all that.
So my interpretation of the logic being put forward is that Dank is only man who can save Essendon, yet there is not a lot of urgency from Essendon to get Dank to talk
Yes. And since I don't think you actually have read the OMs, and doubt your ability to locate them yourself, here you go:
http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/25233/Essendon-Orginating-Appliation.pdf
http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/25234/Hird-Originating-Application.pdf
Please point me to where you say that Essendon is trying to prevent the players from taking legal action against Essendon.
Its not exactly ASADA's problem is it. They have issued SC's without Dank.
On the other hand Essendon are sure that their players have not taken banned substances and the only person who can seemingly 100% confirm this is Dank - cause you know, the bombers don't now, don't have records and all that.
So my interpretation of the logic being put forward is that Dank is only man who can save Essendon, yet there is not a lot of urgency from Essendon to get Dank to talk
Sigh. Apart from repeatedly publicly urging him to come forward you mean? And, as I said, please make a sound legal argument as to how they can compel him to make a statement, or disgorge records that he says Essendon has already.
