larkis
Win it for Him
To be honest, mainly because he is the biggest threat here to Spangher, so it's easier to slowly eliminate the bigger threats while everyone takes out the rest.Didn't rate his game??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
To be honest, mainly because he is the biggest threat here to Spangher, so it's easier to slowly eliminate the bigger threats while everyone takes out the rest.Didn't rate his game??
I... Didn't?You cant vote twice in one day
Zarks Larkis, and Greennick
I wouldrather me delete my post and recreate a new one in a minute?
Oops.You cant vote twice in one day
Zarks Larkis, and Greennick
Compared to Spangs, they ain't very good...Since Spangher is not very good, being not as good as Spangher would to be not as good as not very good. This would mean that everyone that is good, can't be good because everyone is below not very good on a scale of being good. To be "not as good as Spangher" would to be practically not good at all.
Too bad you didn't because you know it can't possibly be true to be better than Spangs. Even in the psyche of a pure anti-Spangher you have and must admit it.I was going along the lines of: "not as good as Spangher" implies impossibility/unhappenable.