Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Saints, Melbourne or even Collingwood will look at Lobb
Jesus give the guy a crack.I’m not sure yet, but with Rory I’m starting to think it’s not the coaching.
Be interesting if their will be show me the money part 3 and what Lobb will say about my club
Ross brought him to Freo, so it wouldn’t surprise me to be honestI reckon the Saints are that desperate they will roll the dice
Chapter 4 of “ The Adventures of Lobb the Flog “ is set to be the best one yet
Yep, blames the coach. Again. Soft.
We've probably moved contracted players to rookie list most years in the last 15 years. Other clubs do it regularly too. Its a list management strategy not disrespect.Why do people on here have such a warped perception on Schultz talent back then? He played every game in a position we had no depth in.
Rookie someone who’s still contracted is actually much more disrespectful and is actually something a player should take offence to. Not someone who signs the exact same contract he would have signed before except he gets moved to an imaginary list because the AFL cut list sizes.
Leaving out the part where a once in 100 years pandemic completely changed the rules and cut list sizes on short notice?Moving Schultz to rookie list isn't either but how often does it happen to second year player that's played 20+ games. ****Ing never is the answer. He had every right to a feel a bit confused. Isn't a reason to though just him covering up the real reason.
That’s actually really shit in the end.He was a cancer towards the end of his time at Freo. We did well getting two second round picks. Effectively
Meek, Lobb > JOM, Davies, Knobel
Lobb - pick 32 (which became 35 Davies) and F2
F2, Meek > JOM and F4
F4 > 42 (Knobel)
Leaving out the part where a once in 100 years pandemic completely changed the rules and cut list sizes on short notice?
Pretty simple answer to any confusion
Colon probably thinking it can drum up the most interest by assuring everyone the Dogs will let him go.I’d love to know the philosophy behind announcing he wants a trade now. All he will be doing is ensuring everyone at the Bulldogs hates him as well as their supporters.
He’s having a little hissy fit to make a point that now that Naughton is injured he’ll be expected to fill in.I’d love to know the philosophy behind announcing he wants a trade now. All he will be doing is ensuring everyone at the Bulldogs hates him as well as their supporters.
Why those other players? they would have been rated similar to Schultz, he was a helicopter merchant in his first 2 years.As was pointed out by Dockeroo a few pages back there was 4-5 other players we could’ve moved to the rookie list.
It was a strange decision at the time and remains so. I don’t think it’s why Schultz left the club though.
I don't think for a second it's why he left the club, but it's really not as disrespectful as people are making it out to be.As was pointed out by Dockeroo a few pages back there was 4-5 other players we could’ve moved to the rookie list.
It was a strange decision at the time and remains so. I don’t think it’s why Schultz left the club though.