Freddie rates WC as important as Ashes

Remove this Banner Ad

Romeo

Norm Smith Medallist
Jan 5, 2006
7,177
0
Hampton, Victoria
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
MAGPIES, BUSHRANGERS
Maybe had England have retained them he would have changed his tune.:)

Andrew Flintoff throws the ball at England training in St Lucia. (AFP)
spacer.gif

World Cup as important as Ashes: Freddie


Andrew Flintoff has insisted the World Cup matters just as much to England as the Ashes.
All sections of English cricket - players, fans and media - tend to prize Test success above all else, with victory in the Ashes series, which England last achieved in 2005, considered the ultimate achievement.
However, after their recent 5-0 Ashes series thrashing in Australia, it was the one-day format that gave England something to cling to as they overcame a poor start to win a triangular tournament also featuring New Zealand - their opponents in their World Cup Group C opener tomorrow morning.
"To me it's on a level," Flintoff told reporters at the Beausejour Cricket Ground in St Lucia when asked to compare the Ashes and the World Cup.
"In Test match cricket you've got the Ashes which is obviously the biggest thing and the World Cup in the one-day format is huge.
"If you look at any other sport the World Cup is the pinnacle of all players' careers. In the one-day format this is it. This is what you build for, this is what you want to play in."
In South Africa four years ago, England's World Cup campaign was overshadowed by protracted wrangling which ultimately led them to boycott their scheduled group match in the Zimbabwe capital of Harare on safety and political grounds - a decision which cost them valuable points.
However, there have been no such distractions this time around and Flintoff said of the team's preparation for this tournament: "It's gone miles better. We haven't been sat in a room for three days discussing things.
"We've been able to get out there, train and practice, just building up. We're in a nice position."
Looking ahead, Flintoff added: "I've played in two World Cups and not got to the second round yet and I am keen to do well in this one.
"It is a big stage and it is a chance for people and teams to shine.
"If you look at our team, we have a side of match-winners and each one of those will want to perform and show what they can do. It's something which excites me and it's definitely something exciting the rest of the lads as well."
-AFP
 
He has a point. They are equally important.

So to back up England's weak as piss Ashes defence, I expect the same from them at the World Cup.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I tend to agree with him. In terms of money, tv audiences, the World Cup is bigger than the Ashes for sure.

Personally I would prefer to win the World Cup over the ashes any day.
 
Whats wrong with that?

I totally agree.
 
Shut your gob, Freddie.

The Ashes are cricket's most prized possession. The history, The urn, Etc.

I guess everyone is perplexed over One Day Cricket at the moment, that we forgot to look at the whole picture.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

every nation except australia rates the world cup as the most important prize in cricket and so do i.

I would rather be the best in the world than beat a nation that in december form were probably and shoudl of been 7th or 8th in the test rankings

the 2006 ashes were a waste of time.
 
I tend to agree with him. In terms of money, tv audiences, the World Cup is bigger than the Ashes for sure.

Personally I would prefer to win the World Cup over the ashes any day.

I agree.

The world cup is more important that the ashes overall for all countries. There's only two sides that would debate that (because of how they vlaue their test series trophy).
 
Good start to the World Cup by England, proving that they are as incompetent in an Ashes Test as they are in a World Cup match.
 
I tend to agree with him. In terms of money, tv audiences, the World Cup is bigger than the Ashes for sure.

Personally I would prefer to win the World Cup over the ashes any day.

So why does England perform so poorly in both? They have yet to win a World Cup, despite hosting it 4 times, are yet to win an ICC Trophy, and have won the Ashes once in 20 years.
 
So why does England perform so poorly in both? They have yet to win a World Cup, despite hosting it 4 times, are yet to win an ICC Trophy, and have won the Ashes once in 20 years.

We're used to failure... There must be some deep rooted problems somewhere but noone knows where they are, we turned a corner then our players went down crook and we haven't been able to pick it up from there.
 
Having lived and studied in England myself, the average bloke could not care less about cricket. It's all about football, football, football. Not many grew up like us going for a hit in the nets with our mates, playing at lunchtime at school, going to matches as a kid. I can't see England ever being #1 in any form of the game.
 
Having lived and studied in England myself, the average bloke could not care less about cricket. It's all about football, football, football. Not many grew up like us going for a hit in the nets with our mates, playing at lunchtime at school, going to matches as a kid. I can't see England ever being #1 in any form of the game.

All the locals ever do in london is talk to me about cricket.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Freddie rates WC as important as Ashes

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top