- Oct 18, 2016
- 5,068
- 9,798
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #51
Right...I guess we needed to tie you guys to a tree or something to win.You are just that bad we couldnt tank enough to still not beat you by over a 100 pts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right...I guess we needed to tie you guys to a tree or something to win.You are just that bad we couldnt tank enough to still not beat you by over a 100 pts.
This is a piss poor comment.AFL should swallow their pride and pack the Gold Coast venture in. Seems like anyone half decent coming through now is jumping ship first chance they get. All the assistance they're getting now won't make a lick of difference.
We were only going to give it to the Crows for McGovern anyway. Probably a blessing in disguise. McGovern is very overrated. I'm not a fan of injury prone third talls.
I am pissed off that the AFL almost forced us into applying only to knock us back. Joke of an organisation.
This is what people said about the Sydney Swans in the early 90s.AFL should swallow their pride and pack the Gold Coast venture in. Seems like anyone half decent coming through now is jumping ship first chance they get. All the assistance they're getting now won't make a lick of difference.
Considering a Crows team with no Tex, Sloane, Smith, Talia, Brad Crouch, Dodee at your home ground, without wanting to win as a win could see us drop one spot down the draft order, destroyed you, I think you would struggle in any State League at this point.
You seem pretty salty.So a thread about two struggling clubs getting draft assistance and you are all look at us we beat you! Onya.
Watched McAdam play at Sturt and plenty of talentHow many times do you need to be told McAdam is not rated as a 15-20 Pick player? Literally no where is he predicted to even go top 50. BS troll rumour that’s all folks.
Yep he's a solid ladCarlton can draft Mitch grigg and give him lance whitnalls 8 and size 17XL shorts
Carlton are a " special needs " clubI assume because he meant that they are "special"
You are just that bad we couldnt tank enough to still not beat you by over a 100 pts.
It's the AFL giving the clubs extra picks without calling it a priority pick.The whole issue with ontrading is it doesn’t improve clubs next season - rather it gives more draft picks and not players To help in 2019
Definitely better than getting Mitch McGovern
Going to benefit us far more than a third tall. Who are the main options?
It's the AFL giving the clubs extra picks without calling it a priority pick.
They are given extra currency for nothing and no obligation to keep it.
These are the new priority picks. Clever work from the AFL to disguise it.
As I have posted elsewhere Carlton will pick Shane McAdam and trade him back to South Australia. He is the highest rated state league player, valued at 15-20, this years Tim Kelly. That will see them land McGovern, either straight up or as part of other deals.
Don't know what GC will do but they should be able to find 2 good mature players valued as 2nd round picks. If it was last year it would be Liam Ryan and Bayley Fitsch. If it was the year before it might've been Luke Ryan and Tom Stewart.
More players of State level quality. Just what both clubs really need!
The AFL can't be seen to be rewarding a club that trades it's best midfielder with extra picks, this is the solution that gets the desired result - more picks to Carlton and Gold Coast without giving them the picks.AFL should do what has done last few years end of First Round but not to say this won’t help. Always good players at VFL and WAFL level.
Blues will still get him. Bulldogs second round will be enough for him. Adelaide will accept the deal.
So tanking still pays offThe AFL has announced that Gold Coast and Carlton will be given access to state league players outside the draft:
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-09-24/afl-gives-blues-suns-special-access-to-state-league-players
Apparently priority picks aren't enough "special assistance".
Yeah its totally unfair to give the bottom teams a single player that has been overlooked/delisted by every other club while the reigning premiers pick up tom lynch for free.Because it isn't just special assistance. IMO it's a tad bit unfair, but that was before I knew it would replace priority picks, which is actually the better outcome.
Same as above.
Lol - just like Blues rolled over and accepted what the Crows offered for Gibbs 2 years ago?
We told them we don't need a PP, they then proceeded to beg us to apply for one for the remainder of the year only to not give one to us.Joke of an organisation... You mean the AFL or Carlton?
I think you severally overestimate the intelligence level of this mob, most of them seem to think pick 12 wouldn't have been enough they wanted pick 1 lol. Town full of collingwood supporters, just ignore them/wave and smile.Well his worth a pick 18-23 that’s what his worth. Crows screwed him over anyway, not like they will be getting unders for him. Most Crows supporters here will agree his worth a pick in that range anyway.