Geelong on the peds...only idiots think so.

Remove this Banner Ad

C'mon, LIFT!!!

That's what Robinson said.

820836-130217-weapon.jpg
 

Log in to remove this ad.

All the dodgy characters, the denials,the rapid massive muscle growths all the circumstantial evidence, is there for all to draw their own conclusions.
Lucky for the Cats it was a while a go and to difficult to build a credible case.
I dont expect anything further to a come of it , its all under the carpet and staying there.

Still puts a big * over the dynasty though in a lot of peoples minds and you cant sweep that under the carpet.
hawks had a drug culture and spend a high draft pick on another druggie who ended up so well
 
hawks had a drug culture and spend a high draft pick on another druggie who ended up so well

Only one AFL club had filed for a court injunction in relation to medical records too, and it wasn't Geelong. Oddly enough, said injunction was filed for about the same time as the Hawks made the finals for the first time in 5 years or so. Coincidence?
 
Only one AFL club had filed for a court injunction in relation to medical records too, and it wasn't Geelong. Oddly enough, said injunction was filed for about the same time as the Hawks made the finals for the first time in 5 years or so. Coincidence?
The AFL filed the injunction. Not Hawthorn. Also there's a huge difference between recreational & performance-enhancing drugs.

Your team relied on doping to win premierships. Ours occasionally ingested Columbian's finest export as a well-earned reward for winning them legitimately.
 
The AFL filed the injunction. Not Hawthorn. Also there's a huge difference between recreational & performance-enhancing drugs.

Your team relied on doping to win premierships. Ours occasionally ingested Columbian's finest export as a well-earned reward for winning them legitimately.
over one third of the playing list starting 22 was on drugs
drugs that are illegal

no other club has shipped off players like chick, thompson, hay, buddy with drug issues
every other club avoided garlett except the hawks

there must be a chem lab in there
 
Only one AFL club had filed for a court injunction in relation to medical records too, and it wasn't Geelong. Oddly enough, said injunction was filed for about the same time as the Hawks made the finals for the first time in 5 years or so. Coincidence?

Every club has recreational drug problems, Hawthorn players just had medical records stolen by gutter journalists. As a mod you should know better than to still think injunction was an issue.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Only one AFL club had filed for a court injunction in relation to medical records too, and it wasn't Geelong. Oddly enough, said injunction was filed for about the same time as the Hawks made the finals for the first time in 5 years or so. Coincidence?
"As a mod"... Probably more apt would be as a mod you should know not to feed trolls.
 
"As a mod"... Probably more apt would be as a mod you should know not to feed trolls.
Rainman truly believes what he posts. :drunk:
 
Rainman truly believes what he posts. :drunk:
We really shouldn't speak ill of the handicapped. Rainman, we're here to help you ok.

Get well soon.
 
Every club has recreational drug problems, Hawthorn players just had medical records stolen by gutter journalists. As a mod you should know better than to still think injunction was an issue.
No one from the Cats does drugs. FACT. Stokes no longer plays for us.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Geelong on the peds...only idiots think so.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top