dave88
Debutant
- Mar 15, 2015
- 58
- 15
- AFL Club
- Essendon
General Question Thread
- Thread starter Keystone agony
- Start date
- Tagged users None
2014 average (I guess past averages as well) + expected change - whether we expect them to improve/drop off as a player this season.
Cheers.
May need to go deeper in a 16 team draft, but this helps.
Last year I used a spreadsheet which showed 2012 and 2013 averages and games played.
I ruled out anyone who had missed more than 6 games 2 seasons in a row (with few exceptions)
This helped me draft a team of consistent performers, who generally stated on the park.
I would have loved to add 2014 stats to this spreadsheet, so that I had a 3 year sample, but this might take a bit of work to do...my draft is this week
Cheers for the feedback, info has been passed on.
Will probably look into expanding it further next season if it's found to be a useful source to those in draft leagues that are using it.
That'd be great.
In a draft league, I feel I really need to be able to sort players into positions, and see clearly, player averages and games played, in order to make more informed decisions. It paid off last year, picking the likes of Kade Simpson and Nick Riewoldt, who, while not having the highest averages, continued their recent records of playing most games each year
A few at that point that could have decent years but not really DT relevant due to poor price
Backs: Bugg, Savage, McGovern, Logan
Mids: Melksham, Wallis
Forwards: Danny Stanley, Cunningham, Stringer, Turner
I really don't know how deep you are going to need to go but a few names I fell that will improve their average. But you never pay the DT price for them in the guns and rookies world.
Hey all
If this isn't the right thread please remove but I'm splitting hairs between Swan AND Bartel for F3. Who should i go for?
Bartel close to 90 in half a game against the Blues, Swan rather inconspicuous for me but still got a high 90 score. Decisions to make...
If this isn't the right thread please remove but I'm splitting hairs between Swan AND Bartel for F3. Who should i go for?
Bartel close to 90 in half a game against the Blues, Swan rather inconspicuous for me but still got a high 90 score. Decisions to make...
- Aug 15, 2011
- 24,950
- 9,016
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #411
I got shutdown by a few for saying swan wasnt a lock at the start of nan cup now everyones questioning his position.
He has been in and out of my team all preseason....right now he is out.
Not confident after watching him closely on saturday night against us. Barely saw him in the middle, seemed like he still may have some fitness issues? I don't know i see him more as an upgrade target now.
- Aug 15, 2011
- 24,950
- 9,016
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #413
Im basically look to pick 3 of these 4 (Bartel, Martin, Gray and Swan) for my starting forward options. My structure could very well change though.
i'm going BMS atm
- Aug 15, 2011
- 24,950
- 9,016
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #415
Does Gray get tagges now as the number 1 port player? Or can he negate that by going forward and still scoring very much like Martin.
Also considering leaving Martin put for round 1 then bringing him in for round 2
that's my reasoning for leaving gray out... how will he go getting worked over week in week out?
he gave freo a belting last time, I cant see Lyon giving him the same grace in round 1.
Martin certainly hasnt lit it up against the blues has he
- Aug 15, 2011
- 24,950
- 9,016
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #418
He usually cops some attention. Carazzo may be waiting for him. Mick does like to tag cotchin aswell, im unsure why teams still tag cotchin
Parasite
Norm Smith Medallist
Score good - up, score bad - down.
Same as last year? Price rises after 1 game for rookies etc?
Parasite
Norm Smith Medallist
Yep. 5 Game rolling average.
Cant remember....is there a formula/s to this?
akkaps
Community Leader
- Mar 20, 2012
- 48,214
- 33,558
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #424
Prior to last season, the formula was:
STARTING PRICES:
As for the rookies, the higher you were picked in the draft, the higher your price, this line was linear and stopped at a particular price. I don't remember the exact numbers.
I tried asking about the new 2014 price formula, but I didn't get far.
New price = (.75 * old price) + (.25 * magic number * 3 game rolling average)
Where the magic number changed every weekSTARTING PRICES:
Base price = DT ave * magic number
If the player played less than 10 games, the price would be multiplied by.70 + (10 - games played * .3)
As for the rookies, the higher you were picked in the draft, the higher your price, this line was linear and stopped at a particular price. I don't remember the exact numbers.
I tried asking about the new 2014 price formula, but I didn't get far.
Similar threads
