Astronomy General Space Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

The Southern Sky Astrophotography exhibition for 2024 has been decided. If you live in sin city you can see the winners in the flesh at the Sydney observatory until 1 February. There are some real beauts.

www.theguardian.com

Galaxies, auroras and a cosmic bat: Southern Sky astrophotography exhibition 2024 – in pictures

The Southern Sky Astrophotography 2024 exhibition displays the top entries from the 20th David Malin awards for Australian astronomers and photographers. The images are on display at the Sydney observatory until 1 February
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Unfortunately the Guardian doesn't mention how they were taken, which I find very annoying with any photography competition, even more so with Astrophotography.
 
CD Xbow said:
The Southern Sky Astrophotography exhibition for 2024 has been decided. If you live in sin city you can see the winners in the flesh at the Sydney observatory until 1 February. There are some real beauts.

www.theguardian.com

Galaxies, auroras and a cosmic bat: Southern Sky astrophotography exhibition 2024 – in pictures

The Southern Sky Astrophotography 2024 exhibition displays the top entries from the 20th David Malin awards for Australian astronomers and photographers. The images are on display at the Sydney observatory until 1 February
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Unfortunately the Guardian doesn't mention how they were taken, which I find very annoying with any photography competition, even more so with Astrophotography.
Click to expand...
Nothing worse than looking at a great picture and not knowing what lens they were using and the settings.
 
CD Xbow said:
The Southern Sky Astrophotography exhibition for 2024 has been decided. If you live in sin city you can see the winners in the flesh at the Sydney observatory until 1 February. There are some real beauts.

www.theguardian.com

Galaxies, auroras and a cosmic bat: Southern Sky astrophotography exhibition 2024 – in pictures

The Southern Sky Astrophotography 2024 exhibition displays the top entries from the 20th David Malin awards for Australian astronomers and photographers. The images are on display at the Sydney observatory until 1 February
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com

Unfortunately the Guardian doesn't mention how they were taken, which I find very annoying with any photography competition, even more so with Astrophotography.
Click to expand...
These pics are amazing. Agree - should have more details.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Cosmologists have been forced to 'make stuff up' to explain a number of inconsistencies between their observations and theories. Dark matter and dark energy are the 2 most notable. I have discussed my dislike of dark matter in previous posts and I am a little hopeful the physicists may have found other explanations for the alleged effects that require pixie dust dark matter.

A recent paper suggests we may be able to also bury dark energy as a requirement for cosmic expansion.

'The new evidence supports the "timescape" model of cosmic expansion, which doesn't have a need for dark energy because the differences in stretching light aren't the result of an accelerating Universe but instead a consequence of how we calibrate time and distance.

It takes into account that gravity slows time, so an ideal clock in empty space ticks faster than inside a galaxy.

The model suggests that a clock in the Milky Way would be about 35 per cent slower than the same one at an average position in large cosmic voids, meaning billions more years would have passed in voids. This would in turn allow more expansion of space, making it seem like the expansion is getting faster when such vast empty voids grow to dominate the Universe.'

www.miragenews.com

Research Rejects Dark Energy, Debunks Universe Expansion

One of the biggest mysteries in science – dark energy – doesn't actually exist, according to researchers looking to solve the riddle of how the
www.miragenews.com www.miragenews.com

Underlying both these issues seems to be a poor understanding of 2 fundamental things which we all experience daily, time and gravity.

Added - I asked one of our silicon friends the following

Q. If the timescape model of dark energy is correct, how might that affect the physical effects that dark matter is used to explain?

'If the timescape model of cosmic expansion is correct, it would fundamentally change our understanding of the universe and the role of dark matter. Here's how it might affect the physical effects attributed to dark matter:
  1. Galaxy Rotation Curves: The timescape model suggests that the observed rotation curves of galaxies, which currently imply the presence of dark matter, could instead be explained by variations in the passage of time due to gravitational fields. This means that the need for dark matter to explain these curves would be eliminated.
  2. Gravitational Lensing: Similarly, the bending of light around massive objects (gravitational lensing) would not require dark matter to explain the extra mass. Instead, it would be due to the differences in how time passes in regions with varying gravitational strengths.
  3. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB): The patterns observed in the CMB, which are currently interpreted as evidence for dark matter, would need to be re-evaluated under the timescape model. The variations in time and space expansion could account for these patterns without invoking dark matter.
  4. Large-Scale Structure: The distribution of galaxies and galaxy clusters across the universe, which is currently attributed to dark matter, would be explained by the uneven expansion of space in the timescape model.
In essence, if the timescape model is correct, it would mean that the phenomena we currently attribute to dark matter are actually due to variations in the way time and space expand in different regions of the universe. This would eliminate the need for dark matter as an explanation and provide a new framework for understanding cosmic expansion.'

The timescape model could kill 2 birds with one stone, wouldn't that be beaut?
 
Last edited:
K2-18b is an exoplanet fairly close to us, at 'only' 124 light years and it has been of interest because of potential 'biosignatures'. It's 2.6 times the size of Earth so it could be a water covered terrestrial type planet, one of the so called super Earths. On the other hand it could be a mini Neptune, one a bit smaller and warmer than which we are familiar. Read about it here.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

NASA’s James Webb Telescope discovers life supporting gases on a planet in space - Times of India

NASA's James Webb Space Telescope has detected an exoplanet, K2-18 b, which is larger than Earth and located in a habitable zone. The planet's atmosph
timesofindia.indiatimes.com timesofindia.indiatimes.com
There is another possibility, a theoretical Hycean planet, one with large oceans and hydrogen-rich atmospheres. Hycean planets are thought to be common around red dwarf stars, and are considered to be a promising place for life.
 
Last edited:
​
Blue Origins New Glenn rocket is supposed to launch today, in fact, it was scheduled to launch around 5.00pm AEST. The contdown is curranty at T -35m, which is worse than a while ago when it was T 20m. The New Glenn is designed to be reusable like Falcon 9, though it's a much larger rocket.
Live updates from CNN
Spaceflight.com has a 13 minute video looking at the rocket and mission, which I found informative.


Added 8.30 pm It was scrubbed because of a 'vehicle subsystem issue'
 

Attachments

  • 1736753165091.png
    1736753165091.png
    78.9 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Comet G3 Atlas should be visible in the southern hemisphere skies tomorrow for the next week. Look south to southwest around 20 minutes after sunset. It may be as bright as Venus is currently but will dim as it moves away from the sun . Hopefully I have clear skies so I can get some pics to share of this comet which hasn’t been past earth for over 160,000
 
Chief said:
They were supposed to be on the moon by now weren't they?
Click to expand...
Mid 2027, but I don't think they will. They need Starship working in its moon lander variant AND Artemis to be up and running. 2029-30 I reckon is realistic, which is the same time that the PRC is planning to land taikonauts. Space Race II, could end up like this:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Registered User said:
Has anyone seen the comet? I haven't. I had a look last night
Click to expand...
I tried to photograph it but couldn’t see it, will try again tonight with a different lens. I’ve upgraded one of my astronomy apps so I can pinpoint the comets location. I’ve seen a few photos of it from Australia so people are seeing it some with naked eye but most with binoculars or 200mm lens.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Astronomy General Space Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top