Plugger35
Umpiring Expert
- Sep 27, 2008
- 139,967
- 162,489
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Black Caps, Sea Eagles, Subiaco
It's not hard to be the smartest guy in the room in a room full of ex-football players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
He's such a wordsmith!It's not hard to be the smartest guy in the room in a room full of ex-football players.
Whateley's morning monologues are just him fapping to himself. At least KB's were short and sweet.
I like it how Gerard and King do their "top 4 seeds" like their voodoo bullshit is a better indication than the ladder.
And surprise, surprise, their top 4 seeds at the end of R23 are just the top 4 on the ladder. Such insight.
Still one of the best in the business. That’s both a slap on the back to him and a kick up the arse the rest in the business
He's a professional commentator. In that regard, I'd say he's both unique and profoundly ordinary.Still one of the best in the business. That’s both a slap on the back to him and a kick up the arse the rest in the business
I recall Trump being described as a poor person's idea of what a rich guy looks like.Certainly has a place in the AFL/Sporting landscape. Interviews with top international sportspersons are very good.
Actually in this context he would be stating that Buckley's kicking style is its very own archetype, an idiosyncratic style of his own that is recognisable by anyone and also the perfect example of kicking.Still using words he doesn't understand to try and sound smart. Today he described Buddy's kicking style as archetypal. That would mean that Buddy kicks the ball like a typical AFL player, which of course he doesn't.
I was talking about Buddy though, not Buckley.Actually in this context he would be stating that Buckley's kicking style is its very own archetype, an idiosyncratic style of his own that is recognisable by anyone and also the perfect example of kicking.
archetype \AHR-kih-type\ noun. 1 : the original pattern or model of which all things of the same type are representations or copies : prototype; also : a perfect example. 2 : a transcendent entity that is a real pattern of which existing things are imperfect representations
Was much better covering cricket, where the ability to draw existential waffle out of an essentially dull game is a requirement.
On football he is cringeworthy.
"As we come to penultimate round, rushing headlong towards the denouement of this season that has been everything and anything but ordinary, the heads of the greats turn to nod their appreciation of this great coach, this champion and say there but for the wind go I....etc"
Followed by Robbo *Drunken waffle*
Using words like that indicates you are exactly what you're describingHe is a shocker, pompous, hypocritical and sanctimonious dork.
Was much better covering cricket, where the ability to draw existential waffle out of an essentially dull game is a requirement.
On football he is cringeworthy.
"As we come to penultimate round, rushing headlong towards the denouement of this season that has been everything and anything but ordinary, the heads of the greats turn to nod their appreciation of this great coach, this champion and say there but for the wind go I....etc"
Followed by Robbo *Drunken waffle*
His mum was an English teacher.
Don't hold back mate.Whately is an agenda-driven sycophantic ‘pseudo intellect’ who has a strong command of language, but uses his intellect to pursue his own positions with regard to events - and as such disguises that he gives any other view short shrift. In this he’s no better than Neil Mitchell - Makes a big story premised on HIS belief.
He’s also gutless..whenever a footballer disagrees with him...he says ZERO in response - watch him when Dunstall has a different view....he looks like a cowering puppy.
As for his ‘Blighty this, Blighty that’ and other suck-holing behaviour......anyone with such a weak will cannot be relied on to present a balanced argument.