That went out the window when they recruited Papley.No dickhead policy !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Finals Wk 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 1 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That went out the window when they recruited Papley.No dickhead policy !!
Probably the copper that arrested them
Buddy?
That went out the window when they recruited Papley.
This news came hot off the press sorry!So many better thread titles that this.
For example:
Two girls one cop
If you're not employed by an organisation, why would you be subject to their illicit drugs policy?
Uh no, they play for the salary outlined in their contracts, which lasted for 6 months until recently.They play for free ?
And can do whatever they want without penalty?
Uh no, they play for the salary outlined in their contracts, which lasted for 6 months until recently.
That means they weren't employed by the AFL (and, yes, therefore not bound by their rules) for the other 6 months of the year, which renders an illicit drugs policy useless.
Most certainly not the case.Except the AFL is free to refuse to hire them next time around so its a moot point.
Most certainly not the case.
...preeeetty obvious that players can't be punished by the AFL for things that arise outside the terms of their contract. I'm not sure what you're struggling to understand about that.So the AFL has to hire them?
I shouldn’t laugh, but.I feel really disappointed in the girls for doing this. How hard is it to have hamstring awareness when you go clubbing?
...preeeetty obvious that players can't be punished by the AFL for things that arise outside the terms of their contract. I'm not sure what you're struggling to understand about that.
Clearly you're confused because you're framing the question as if it applies to the two Sydney players, when it doesn't. They were/are on 12-month contracts now, which is why the AFL were able to punish them.
This should be celebrated if investigation shows that that their CFLW salary funded "God's way of telling you that you have to much money" (Urban Dictionary). At the very least, the celebrity association would could have contributed to procurement. I say this with acknowledgement that blow can donate its way a blonde or two in the average night club.It's good that the pay gap has closed far enough that they can now afford to join their male counterparts in this.
Wrong again. Contracts were for the period from November to May, and the sign-and-trade period always took place during that stretch. This still leaves six months for re-signed players to go away and do whatever they want.Clearly you are incapable of seeing that if they are out of contract then they would need a new contract in order to play again.
Which the AFL has control over. And would be able to dictate terms.
That's no excuse
It's the attitude of a bush league