Proof?They're consistently corrupt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Proof?They're consistently corrupt
Nice work SM put words in my mouth mate
Does posting outside the confines of the SFA make you a twit????
I'm a Freo fan and thought that was a BS suspension haha - was just silly
Nice work SM put words in my mouth mate
Does posting outside the confines of the SFA make you a twit????
I can only assume you are attempting to make light of the whole Goodes racism stuff. If you're not, it's a sad, sad reflection on you as a person.Racist MRP. Would have copped weeks if he was just a white guy and not a poster boy for all things indigenous.
You have to love the screams of "not fair". Wouldn't mind betting that the clowns screaming that Goodes deserves 4 weeks are the same ones who derided the AFL & the MRP for being too soft in the Viney incident. The bump is dead!!!, remember all that hysteria from a few weeks ago?
Spare me. Goodse was careless, and the incident was no more than a glancing knock of inconsequential impact to the side of Selwood. Is this the direction you want the game to head down, or is it because its Goodes that you want him suspended. No player should ever be suspended for an incident like this.
Ablett, Judd and now GoodesProof?
So you're ignoring the insufficient force part of the equation?
Probably a reprimand or suspension like he has copped 4 out of the 5 times he has been to the MRP. Doesn't quite fit the he always gets off stereotype does it?If the whole MRP panel and system isnt scrapped at seasons end, AFL is in real trouble.
But as people have already stated its Goodes what else did we expect.
Its Sydney what else did we expect
Perfect example of someone who knows nothing about the game.You have to love the screams of "not fair". Wouldn't mind betting that the clowns screaming that Goodes deserves 4 weeks are the same ones who derided the AFL & the MRP for being too soft in the Viney incident. The bump is dead!!!, remember all that hysteria from a few weeks ago?
Spare me. Goodse was careless, and the incident was no more than a glancing knock of inconsequential impact to the side of Selwood. Is this the direction you want the game to head down, or is it because its Goodes that you want him suspended. No player should ever be suspended for an incident like this.
In regards to this incident clearly.
Selwood didn't leave the ground, he wasn't subbed for any amount of time for a concussion test. What are you expecting a medical report would have said? He suffered concussion? Then Geelong would be fined for not following concussion rules.Had he got a week for the first offence as he should have, he would have for another week for the second. The Bartram offence ridculously classed as negligent when he left the ground - consitently classed as reckless in other cases
Notice what isn't mentioned in this statement...
The match day report against Sydney’s Adam Goodes for rough conduct against Geelong’s Joel Selwood was assessed. The ball is loose following a boundary throw in and has bounced high in the air. Both players have their eyes on the ball, Selwood taps the ball forward and Goodes jumps in an attempt to contest the ball and braces for contact. Contact is made. It was the view of the panel the contact made was below that required to constitute a reportable offence. No further action was taken.
That's right, they didn't look at the medical report - amazing really.
Perfect example of someone who knows nothing about the game.
Viney had NO alternative and was contesting a 50/50 ball. He turned and braced to protect himself.
Goodes jumped in the air and collected someone high. Deliberately.
There is if your a Swans fanEddie was right, they did let him off because of Indigenous week.
Case A: Low Impact
Case B: Insufficient Force
There's no defending that.
Selwood was actually rocked. You could see him staggering and he reached out and held onto his opponents hand to stop himself falling over. "The head is sacrosanct" is obviously plain old bullshit.YEAH! Usually Selwoods head is covered in blood, therefor Goodes used insufficient force, close the book on that one. It wasn't like that aggressive headbutt by Stevie J which laid Crowley out flat, the MRP found all kinds of force in that one.
Eddie was right, they did let him off because of Indigenous week.
Case A: Low Impact
Case B: Insufficient Force
There's no defending that.
PersonalNice work SM put words in my mouth mate
Does posting outside the confines of the SFA make you a twit????
Ablett, Judd and now Goodes
Defence rests
Perfect example of someone who knows nothing about the game.
Viney had NO alternative and was contesting a 50/50 ball. He turned and braced to protect himself.
Goodes jumped in the air and collected someone high. Deliberately.
the balls location is slightly different in the two cases dont you reckon?
i thought he was lucky not to cop a week reduced to off by pleading guilty by letter of the law, but not more than harvey or hocking
stevie j was stiff
ill ignore the goodes rubbish about him being protected, put it aside
there are inconsistencies in this MRP, no denying that
You are not seriously comparing a guy running off the wing to jump and elbow a player to the head are you?Can't rub out an indigenous player in indigenous week
Edit: imagine the uproar if the charges were reversed, with Goodes getting weeks and Sidebottom getting let off
Yeah most people put their arms up for those. Cant recall too many marking contests where I tucked my arms in and didnt look at the ball.....Pesky marking contests, hey.