Whilst I have to trust our football department (who get it right far more often than they don't), I really would prefer we kept Hallahan. We seem as a club to be moving away from slower, contested ball players and more and more into outside pace. It seems the club view this is where the game is heading. I have read (note: media) that Hallahan did say he wanted to stay but was informed that opportnities are going to be limited, particularly with O'Rourke added. I understand that our stars haven't retired, Langford has gone past and Woody may also be ahead but I feel Hallahan is lower in the pecking order than he should be. Others, including Langers, got call ups before him despite him being the best performed of the three at VFL level at the time. He also started well at AFL level. I'm not sure whether it means anything at all but it took Brendan Bolton being in charge before he got (an almost immediate) call up. Either way, I don't want to put all our eggs in the Woody basket. I don't want to end up with too many quick outside players and have too few in the contest to win the ball. I think there will remain more than 1 place in every AFL side for slow players who can win the footy. I have a sneaking suspicion that in a few years we may look at Hallahan and think this is a player we could really use ala Josh Kennedy (but not as good). Hope I'm wrong - or that we retain him, particularly as I think we will get less than his full value.
I don't see why O'Rourke automatically goes past Hallahan either?Get into pre season and whoever puts their hand up and shows the hunger to break into a premiership side gets first crack.