Hangover Part III

Remove this Banner Ad

Dead set garbage really was not funny

They should have made these characters come back which could have made it more of a laugh

Eddy the chapel guy he was hillarious
The two cops that took them in the first time could have done something great with that
Tyson even for a small scene could have been funny

2/5 stars and thats being generous
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #28
BEEG said:
Dead set garbage really was not funny

They should have made these characters come back which could have made it more of a laugh

Eddy the chapel guy he was hillarious
The two cops that took them in the first time could have done something great with that
Tyson even for a small scene could have been funny

2/5 stars and thats being generous
Click to expand...

the cops were funny
eddie the chapel guy and samir (you tell him samir say "hellllo") the night club owner in bangkok shouldve made a cameo
no song by stu!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

H1 and H2 were IMHO sensational. Loved then both.

H3 was very disappointing.

Not quite sure why Allan went all street gangsta but it didn't work and made him sound like a total flog.
 
ioppolo said:
I don't know why they focused around Alan so much. I'm not a big Galifinakis fan and I don't know why everyone loves the character 'Alan' so much.
Click to expand...

Alan in H1 was very much a loveable idiot savant.

By H3 he was just annoying.

I still dont see how the Giraffe scene was that funny.

CGI and all...but fun out of an animal being ********.
 
I'm in the minority that don't find Ken Leong funny in this movie series at all

I like the Zach G character though
 
I didn’t have high expectations but really – it was another movie ruined by the trailer. The trailer showed all the funny parts so the movie itself was a bit flat. I think it is open to another but I don’t think there is enough gags left.

Chow – there was too much of him. He was OK in the first movie but has been given too much in each storyline.

The bit during the credits was easily the best.


In saying that, the first was too good that nothing was never going to be close
 
Didn't go in with high expectations, but it was a solid movie without being anything more than that. Like that they took it down a different path with Phil & Stew playing support roles, with Alan and Chow really being the lead characters. Some good laughs, but best part of the movie was in the credits. Hilarious!
 
HBF said:
Didn't go in with high expectations, but it was a solid movie without being anything more than that. Like that they took it down a different path with Phil & Stew playing support roles, with Alan and Chow really being the lead characters. Some good laughs, but best part of the movie was in the credits. Hilarious!
Click to expand...
Exactly my take

Really the movie revolved around Alan. Good they broke up the formula.

Number 1 is still an absolute classic.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gasometer said:
The whole movie....I had no idea what I was about to watch and then seeing how it all unfolded from that opening scene was a surprise after surprise.
Click to expand...

Ahh okay...Ive seen them...Just couldnt remember...thought maybe I missed something huge...Maybe I should watch again.
 
Horrible, and as others have said ruined by the trailer. Knew it was going to be crap, but wanted to complete the trilogy. Shouldn't have bothered ...
 
Chow was hilarious throughout the whole film. John Goodman played a great bad-guy as well. Ed Helms and Brad Cooper were somewhat disappointing, I didn't think they were given the screentime they deserved (in particular Helms).

I personally thought it was on par with 'The Hangover', most will disagree with me though
 
BLPC08 said:
Chow was hilarious throughout the whole film. John Goodman played a great bad-guy as well. Ed Helms and Brad Cooper were somewhat disappointing, I didn't think they were given the screentime they deserved (in particular Helms).

I personally thought it was on par with 'The Hangover', most will disagree with me though
Click to expand...

Chow. No.

Goodman. No.

On a par- No.

The rest yah.
 
It was pretty much the Chow and Alan show, with a bit of Goodman thrown in. Goodman was alright, but his character seemed really forced. Too much of Chow was a bad thing, Alan was good in this film I thought, but there was little screen time given to anyone except these three, and I think the film suffered. Also was more of an action movie than comedy, I hardly laughed in it, but it wasn't a good action movie. 2/5 and that's generous.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hangover Part III

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top