Draft Profile Hayden Crozier

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

tomsimpkin31 said:
What are your serious predictions about what range he will go at?
Click to expand...

GWS with pick 13 or 15 otherwise the 20-30 mark

Has plenty of potential but most of the top 20 players have had great years,Hayden has had too many quite games and is a porject play (68kg)
 
cotter101 said:
Why would that be?
Click to expand...

inconsistent, in and out of games, does not work hard enough, maybe he just does not have a big motor, not my type of player, I want a player who will put their body on the line and do anything they can to get themselves involved in the game.
He did not even try and kick the goal after that mark, so maybe a confidence player on top of this.
 
BrownPearHookers said:
inconsistent, in and out of games, does not work hard enough, maybe he just does not have a big motor, not my type of player, I want a player who will put their body on the line and do anything they can to get themselves involved in the game.
He did not even try and kick the goal after that mark, so maybe a confidence player on top of this.
Click to expand...

That doesn't mean anything. A teammate was in massive space in a far better angle than he was. That screams team player to me, and guy with a calm head on his shoulders. Most players would've let the adrenaline get to them and went for glory with a banana.
 
Re: Brother of Hayden?

gotassieboys said:
Was looking at the AFL website for players who had managers and I noticed a Luke Crozier.

Is he a brother of Hayden, and what is his story.
Click to expand...

I believe he is a cousin of Hayden's, from Old Carey in the ammos league. I found a video on youtube of him (kinda slow and long), seems as though he has a leap similar to Hayden's! I have heard that a few clubs have been looking at him on the grape vine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqmiq8HEMXg
 
Re: Brother of Hayden?

Prem87 said:
Any chance he'll slide to Westcoast's first pick (23)?
Click to expand...

Would definitely provide west coast with another handy forward/midfielder, but with the amount of picks GWS have, I really can't see them passing on him.

I've also heard from a mate that Western Bulldogs/Richmond are super keen on him, nothing like rumours at this time of year hey ;)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Can he be good at both feet? Uses the left alot put can he play with the right, love to see him at Geelong...
 
tigs2010 said:
Big possibility. Provided he's there of course. GWS would have to be having a look IMO.
Click to expand...

He doesn't really strike me as someone Richmond would have a crack at. He's too much of a risk, and Richmond need sure bets, as their issue is not classy top liners, but rather general depth.
He's more of a bloke North should be going after. A really solid developing core without the multitude of flashy players. Big risk, big reward, much like we did with Harper.
 
AGC said:
He doesn't really strike me as someone Richmond would have a crack at. He's too much of a risk, and Richmond need sure bets, as their issue is not classy top liners, but rather general depth.
He's more of a bloke North should be going after. A really solid developing core without the multitude of flashy players. Big risk, big reward, much like we did with Harper.
Click to expand...
We also have 2 first rounders and have a whole heap of backflank/mids not a lot of forwards. If a safer prospect fell through that can play as a genuine mid like a Kavanagh/Adams as well as push forward then we'd be all over it. But i'm skeptical they will last.
 
love the look of his highlights, but consistency is a massive problem

the difference between him and Dale Thomas is that DT was pick 2. He MUST have shown some consistency to be picked so high. I can see Crozier being a good impact player early on. First few games could show him as an ideal sub. Quick, classy, loads of energy

Wouldn't be unhappy to pick him up at 19, although i think we should be looking at a pure mid
 
Jason Phelan's article
Crozier was just shaded by SA's Chad Wingard in the running vertical jump, but his leap of 91cm was still very impressive. He ran a 2.89s 20m sprint, which is elite, and complements that with good endurance as shown by his 14.7 beep test.
Click to expand...

^^Endurance musn't be a problem, maybe just work rate.
 
People on BF arnt keen^

Posters on bigfooty like always have put 2 and 2 together and it seems that the only reason he is rated is because of that one mark he took - wrong. This guy is a lovely kick of the footy and i not like many others on here can see him playing on a half back flank or wing just as well as a half forward flank. Was surprised to see him get 14.7 in the beep, but people saying he isnt consistent and all that im not really sure about and avg 19 possessions a game throughout the TAC.

Getting a bit hard done by the BF majority not knowing much more about him than knowing he is rated because he took one good mark, is skinny so will take a year or two to develop which most fans dont like, they like an impact straight away from picks, which just doesnt happen.

Also looking at stats his efficiency by foot was 65% compared to Ellis was only 57%, Seb Ross 53% in the TAC cup
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Draft Profile Hayden Crozier

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top