- Banned
- #51
If you get the opportunity, GoOsH1, have a look at it in slow motion. It was intended to hurt but I agree that you see it in AFL football. A "normal" AFL tackle brings the tacklee to the ground. A growing proportion of tackles now end up with an "add on", an attempt to make the contact with the ground especially hard, either by putting the weight of the tackler's body behind the tackle and riding the tacklee into the ground or using momentum and slinging the tacklee into the ground, which is what Pearce did. The add on is prohibited in International Rules. If you'd said that Pearce didn't know the tacklee was Geraghty, that might be fair enough because he may not have although he had Geraghty in his sights long enough before the tackle to think, "hey, that's the bloke we agreed to give it to". That sling was vicious, even by AFL standards because the arms were pinned and Pearce made a point of landing on Geraghty's head. For what it's worth, I believe that Pearce knew who it was.I honestly can't believe that you think that tackle was in any way intentionally attempting to hurt Geraghty, it's a standard tackle that you'd see in almost any afl game, .....
Thank you for your kind words, Cavanmaniac. I'm Australian and insofar as the AFL players concerned represent me, which they don't, most of them are an embarassment. To be fair, they don’t carry on like that in AFL footy. Bullies getting their comeuppance, the triumph of the oppressed over the oppressors, the victim who fights back, that’s the theme of most action or drama films, it’s a common theme. It was played out in the first quarter.