Hey Kochie

Remove this Banner Ad

Ridiculous comparison given that the clubs in that comp are largely on their own with no equalisation payments or grants. You're welcome to judge his financial prowess on what he delivers this year. He was to be the next CEO of Australian Rugby, not a position you would get if you don't have the skills.
Bill Pulver says hello. Take a look at the financial mess that the ARU in :rolleyes:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How does that relate to the fact that Fagan was seen as the logical choice for CEO to sort out their problems?
So why didn't he get the job then instead of Pulver if he was so well suited to the position?

Pulver had no prior involvement with rugby. Obviously Fagan was not wanted and was one of the reasons why he looked elsewhere.
 
So why didn't he get the job then instead of Pulver if he was so well suited to the position?

Pulver had no prior involvement with rugby. Obviously Fagan was not wanted and was one of the reasons why he looked elsewhere.

He didn't apply for the job, he was slated to replace Pulver. Get your facts in order Nelso.
 
He didn't apply for the job, he was slated to replace Pulver. Get your facts in order Nelso.
If he was so well thought of in the ARU, he would have been head hunted to get the job before Pulver. Obviously the ARU did not think much of him at the time.
 
Is that a fact! Why wasn't Thomas headhunted prior to going to Port? I mean of he was so well regarded and all....
So Fagan quits the Brumbies only months after signing a one year contract extension and then comes out and admits he was thinking about leaving for the past four years.

His heart was really in the job was it? Or was that because the ship was sinking fast?

He should fit in well at the Camries.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rug...f-andrew-fagan-steps-down-20131122-2xzuq.html
 
So Fagan quits the Brumbies only months after signing a one year contract extension and then comes out and admits he was thinking about leaving for the past four years.

His heart was really in the job was it? Or was that because the ship was sinking fast?

He should fit in well at the Camries.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rug...f-andrew-fagan-steps-down-20131122-2xzuq.html

So a guy was loyal despite the fact he wanted a change. That's a bad trait? He's no John James is he. You also neglected to mention that he was in the role for 12 years.
 
So Fagan quits the Brumbies only months after signing a one year contract extension and then comes out and admits he was thinking about leaving for the past four years.

His heart was really in the job was it? Or was that because the ship was sinking fast?

He should fit in well at the Camries.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rug...f-andrew-fagan-steps-down-20131122-2xzuq.html
You won't find a single past or present Brumbies board member who was sad to see him go. Some are shocked that he got another job in club land. Brumbies sold off their major asset under his management, sold off sponsorship cheap, lived beyond their means and are now in big financial trouble.

I like how he said I leave the organisation in good shape. Who does that remind you of?
 
You won't find a single past or present Brumbies board member who was sad to see him go. Some are shocked that he got another job in club land. Brumbies sold off their major asset under his management, sold off sponsorship cheap, lived beyond their means and are now in big financial trouble.

I like how he said I leave the organisation in good shape. Who does that remind you of?

How about some sources to support your bullshit? Oh you don't have any? So why are there articles stating what a loss he was to the Brumbies and why was he offered a national role?
 
You won't find a single past or present Brumbies board member who was sad to see him go. Some are shocked that he got another job in club land. Brumbies sold off their major asset under his management, sold off sponsorship cheap, lived beyond their means and are now in big financial trouble.

I like how he said I leave the organisation in good shape. Who does that remind you of?

So, no sources at all. Didn't think so.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

So a guy was loyal despite the fact he wanted a change. That's a bad trait? He's no John James is he. You also neglected to mention that he was in the role for 12 years.
Yep and for the last four years while he was there he did not want to be there.

Inspiring stuff from your CEO.
 
He doesn't , but our Chairman whose financial credentials are unquestionable, has a team in place to deal with that side. Fagan's expertise is in overall club management which includes overall management of the club's P+L.

Here's a question for Rob Chapman.

"When Stephen Trigg told him that they re-signed Tippett in 2009 with "managable risk" did you ask Trigg what that "manageable risk" was?"

Here's a few follow up questions.

"If you didn't ask what the "manageable risk" was, doesn't this make you incompetent and shouldn't you stand down?"

"If you did ask what the "manageable risk" and Trigg lied to you why didn't you sack him immediately after the Crows cheating was exposed and shouldn't you stand down for not doing so?"

"If you did ask what the "manageable risk" and Trigg told you the truth doesn't that make you also a cheat and shouldn't you stand down?"

Yep, Rob Chapman, unquestionable ... only if you're a dimwitted Crows supporter.:thumbsu:
 
Last edited:
Here's a question for Rob Chapman.

"When Stephen Trigg told him that they re-signed Tippett in 2009 with "managable risk" did you ask Trigg what that "manageable risk" was?"

Here's a few follow up questions.

"If you didn't ask what the "manageable risk" was, doesn't this make you incompetent and shouldn't you stand down?"

"If you did ask what the "manageable risk" and Trigg lied to you why didn't you sack him immediately after the Crows cheating was exposed and shouldn't you stand down for not doing so?"

"If you did ask what the "manageable risk" and Trigg told you the truth doesn't that make you also a cheat and shouldn't you stand down?"

Yep, Rob Chapman, unquestionable ... only if your a dimwitted Crows supporter.:thumbsu:

Trigg offered his resignation it wasn't accepted. Mostly due to the impact of the club moving to AO and the stage that was at. If Trigg was rotten to the core, why did the AFL not intervene in his appointment at Carlton? Chapman is guilty of trusting what he was told in this situation and he was let down.
 
Trigg offered his resignation it wasn't accepted. Mostly due to the impact of the club moving to AO and the stage that was at. If Trigg was rotten to the core, why did the AFL not intervene in his appointment at Carlton? Chapman is guilty of trusting what he was told in this situation and he was let down.

So you say he was lied to and is incompetent? After all, everyone knew that Trigg was a lying piece of crud now we know he is a cheating lying piece of crud.
 
He's the guy not presiding over another multi million dollar loss. Where's Kochie?
Chapman knew everything about Tippettgate at the time and made Triggy the fall guy to save his own skin.

And what about his promise to the members and supporters that he would explain everything about what happened with Tippetgate?

Where's Chapman when you need him to tell the truth?
 
Chapman knew everything about Tippettgate at the time and made Triggy the fall guy to save his own skin.

And what about his promise to the members and supporters that he would explain everything about what happened with Tippetgate?

Where's Chapman when you need him to tell the truth?

So what is it that you don't know? What other questions do you need an answer to? Sanctions imposed, club has paid the price, we move on.

So will you be insisting that Koch and Thomas stand down after presiding over another year of massive losses? Surely that means they are incompetent and unable to manage a club within its means.
 
So you say he was lied to and is incompetent? After all, everyone knew that Trigg was a lying piece of crud now we know he is a cheating lying piece of crud.

Trigg made a massive error in judgement and tried to cover his tracks. He paid a personal price and the club paid dearly. He's no longer there. Do you have a lynch mob out looking for John James to be held account for his performance, or have you moved on?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hey Kochie

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top