I think you're making a good case for equity financing over debt .
Nah, debt financing at the project level means a lower equity ticket. Also means debt holders can be paid later (provided they agree to a longer notional tenor and favourable debt service coverage ratios), so more distributions to equity holders can be made sooner which means a higher equity IRR. Not to mention the cost of debt will always be cheaper than the cost of equity.
But yeah you're right lenders have a low risk appetite so will ensure adequate hedging is in place to reduce cash flow volatility or will ensure a large (70%+) percentage of revenues are contracted with an investment grade offtaker in order to minimise the risk of the sponsor being unable to meet its debt payment obligations.
Power Raid said:The issue I have with Bitcoin is it will be caught up in trade/ currency wars, taxation and crime
I think you're view is a little outdated here... Bitcoin hasn't really been used for crime since silk road was seized.
Power Raid said:Bitcoin is by default governed by the US and China, as any transaction that used US and Chinese currency needs to comply with the US and Chinese laws. So if China or the US decide to lock up the founders, the top 100 bitcoin owners or system of Bitcoin, where is the market confidence in the platform?
You obviously don't understand bitcoin if you think that will happen (that's ok, not many people do). Let's just say good luck to them if they tried to do that.. They would need it.
No government is going to attempt to ban bitcoin right now. It's too small. It has a 700 billion dollar market cap, the bond market by comparison is a 40 trillion dollar market cap. Once it becomes a similar size to the bond market, then it will be relevant to them, but by then the genie will be well and truly out of the bottle. I would argue that it is out of the bottle now with the mass adoption and all the network effects. Also, governments have tried to ban gold in the past and how did that work for them?