- May 3, 2007
- 39,439
- 23,044
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Man City, Valencia, Lazio, Panthers
Sorry I have been influenced by Plugger35 ...... Saying that.... I felt sad.Poor guy
I only thought of one song.
Boys II Men : End of the road
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry I have been influenced by Plugger35 ...... Saying that.... I felt sad.Poor guy
He's right through. This thread is already dead. Just like masters is.boys II men: end of the road
Scott Watters got all that power to his head apparentlyShould’ve stuck with Scott Watters.
That's like saying the Labor party should have stuck with Mark Latham.Should’ve stuck with Scott Watters.
I might’ve stopped him turning into an hyper ********.That's like saying the Labor party should have stuck with Mark Latham.
I saw part of the press conference on the Front Bar, I can't believe Finnis, looking over Richardson's accomplishments, highlighted "nearly making the finals, missing by %" as his crowning achievement.
The St. Kilda football club is an embarrassment. They really should merge, for the good of the competition.
Getting back to the OP, I think Fremantle won this thread.
Didn't he once say that he'd never even sat down and watched the 66' umpire assisted Bradbury victory?Raising the issue of trophy cabinets isn't your best hand here Plugger
That's very poor from such an ardent fan and prominent umpire critic.Didn't he once say that he'd never even sat down and watched the 66' umpire assisted Bradbury victory?
Raising the issue of trophy cabinets isn't your best hand here Plugger
Didn't he once say that he'd never even sat down and watched the 66' umpire assisted Bradbury victory?
Man with enough free time to make 95,347 posts on a sports forum can't be bothered to sit down for 2 hours to watch his club's only premiership win properly. Classic.That's very poor from such an ardent fan and prominent umpire critic.
A huge discrepancy in a 1 point win.I haven't watched the entire game but i've seen parts of it, enough to know that the umpiring wasn't much of a factor.
Man with enough free time to make 95,347 posts on a sports forum can't be bothered to sit down for 2 hours to watch his club's only premiership win properly. Classic.
A huge discrepancy in a 1 point win.
Predated the out of bounds on the full rules (introduced 1969) and deliberate out of bounds rules too so all of those free kicks actually impacted the contest.
It was most likely the major deciding factor.
Rule changes 1858 onwards - AFL.com.au
www.afl.com.au
that's because it is an irrelevent vfl grand final in 1966 not a relevent and fresh in everybodies minds 2016 afl grand final, there two different codes mate, vfl flags don't really count these daysYet the umpiring of that game has never been brought up in the media like the umpiring in the 2016 GF was.
I was on BigFooty back then and I clearly remember esteemed Collingwood poster Plugger1835 melting down about it for months.Yet the umpiring of that game has never been brought up in the media like the umpiring in the 2016 GF was.
That's the attitude I'd expect from a spotty teenager.How many people would sit down and watch a full game from over 50 years ago with grainy black and white footage? Not many I wouldn't think.