The url doesn't work, Notorious.
That's strange seems to work for me.
Spoilers
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The url doesn't work, Notorious.
Now I've recovered from the mindf**k, I'll try and post a more eloquent, spoiler free, review.
Outstanding movie. It's a movie where you definitely need to be paying attention all the time as everything is moving the plot forward in some way. Even things that appear to be pure character development come up later on, sometimes in a big way. If you can keep up though it's a gripping story, even made me drop my bag of M&Ms at one point. It avoids the cliche of twists and turns, but it just keeps taking you places you don't expect it to, and even when you do expect it, it still feels like something fresh.
Leo continues his reign of dominating quality cinema with yet another outstanding performance. Seriously, is there anything this bloke can't do? Have a look at the movies his company's been producing. The guy's a god.
Rest of the cast is outstanding, as you'd expect. Real surprise for me, having not seen (500) Days of Summer, was Joseph Gordon-Levitt. For so long I would've just thought of him as "that guy from 3rd Rock". But here's he's fantastic. He's definitely made my List (the list of actors who I'll go see a film purely because they're in it). Others like Ken Watanabe and Marion Cotillard put in the great performances you'd expect. Ellen Page carries on with her rise, very solid here. And I've already admitted that anytime Cillian Murphy was onscreen, I just watched him.
Visual effects are fantastic, but not in a "oh look how good the special effects are" kind of way. Obviously being a movie about dreams there's a lot of crazy stuff happening at times, but an interesting fact is this movie actually has LESS visual effect shots than Batman Begins, Nolan prefers doing as much physically as he can, which really helps not distract from the reality of the story.
Overall, I only had one disappointment about the film. Too much action. It feels like he put in too many action sequences when the story and the characters would've been more than enough. Particularly in the final 20 minutes or so. I would've been much happier if it's just played out with some more character driven stuff, especially with Cillian Murphy's and Leo's characters. One can't help but feel Cillian was under utilised in the final 20 minutes of the film.
Apart from that though, the movie's fantastic. Very Chris Nolan. Now watch it not win a single Oscar.
Thought the ending saved it, wasnt really getting into it much before that although it really looks to be a movie you need to see more than once. The over-use of the word 'subconscious' when they were doing all the training stuff really shitted me. Can someone tell me who the old wrinkled guy was cause i feel like im missing a major link with him.
Thought the ending saved it, wasnt really getting into it much before that although it really looks to be a movie you need to see more than once. The over-use of the word 'subconscious' when they were doing all the training stuff really shitted me. Can someone tell me who the old wrinkled guy was cause i feel like im missing a major link with him.
I don't know how you could avoid it. Out of interest, what kind of movies do you pay attention to the score?The score isn't really something I pay attention to whilst watching these types of movies tbh.
Agreed. They should have halved her screen time and it would have had a bigger effect.Enjoyed it a lot, though I feel it would have been ever better had they trimmed some of the Cotillard stuff. Am on board with the praise for Gordon-Levitt, he was superb.
yes you are
Ken Watanabe as Saito, the Tourist – a businessman who employs Cobb and assists their mission
so hes the asian dude
kind of a MASSIVE thing to help linking the whole movie up
That would of been my guess but in his dream where they have to tip leo into the bath to bring him back out he is only one that is aged and the rest are all the same. When they go back to that same scene in the house at the end of the film and they talk is that still a dream or are they both in limbo land?
I walked out of this film and the first thing i said to the person i saw it with was poor mans Matrix. Nothing has changed my opinion on that. I liken it to the Lost finale, people can call it mind**** or whatever else but bottom line is a lot of it doesnt add up.
The film starts with Leo washng up on the beach, then walking in to talk to the old guy (Saito).
It then flashes back to the past, an earlier dream, where Leo's talking to a young Saito with Arthur (Joseph Gordon Levitt)
Not that complicated
Maybe you missed the flashback.There is a scene where 2 guards drag leo off the beach and sit him down at a table opposite the asian guy. One is aged the other is not. Why?
There is a scene where 2 guards drag leo off the beach and sit him down at a table opposite the asian guy. One is aged the other is not. Why?
i think LemonChicken may need to see the movie again or read the wiki page for inception. it explains the movie plot in some details and may answer some queries.
There is a scene where 2 guards drag leo off the beach and sit him down at a table opposite the asian guy. One is aged the other is not. Why?