- Banned
- #526
Isn't that basically what we've been playing all these years?
Ummm, no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Isn't that basically what we've been playing all these years?
Because they had a team which was experienced with using the round ball and actually had some genuine talent.They didn't seem to have any major problems with kicking overs last year.
Because they had a team which was experienced with using the round ball and actually had some genuine talent.
You skipped over the experienced part.Seems to me the round ball isn't the problem then, the quality of the players is.
Can't blame the rules for that one.
I enjoy the games and I hope the series continues.
We were beaten by a better team this time, as simple as that. The Irish were impressive, and would have beat us under AFL rules.
I thought Tadgh Kenelly was the prime mover and man of the match. Also how good a prospect is Tommy Walsh for the Swans. But many of the Irish impressed.
The Irish were impressive, and would have beat us under AFL rules.
The Irish went in fully prepared and picked their best team available.
The Aussies went in COMPLETELY uninterested, approached it like a picnic.
Disgraceful episode.
To pick a team like we did is shameful.
And they played like embarrasing marshmellows
What the F--K !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Represent Australia and you must put all in.
I would have shirtfronted everybody including the umpires to fire up the Aussies.
We were beaten by a better team this time, as simple as that. The Irish were impressive, and would have beat us under AFL rules.
The Irish are a very fit looking, bigger stronger team, with a liberal sprinkling of past and present AFL players, and given current AFL rules where you earn a free kick if anybody dares to touch you (thats a whole other thread).lol wut?
It might have been a team of spuds, but they were still AFL listed spuds. Under AFL rules they would have won by 40 goals.
The Irish are a very fit looking, bigger stronger team, with a liberal sprinkling of past and present AFL players, and given current AFL rules where you earn a free kick if anybody dares to touch you (thats a whole other thread).
Call me a troll if you want, but I repeat, against the team we put out, the Irish would have won under AFL rules.
None of them are spuds at AFL level, they are all decent players. However, they are either still too young, or just below the top echelon of players e.g. Kelly and Vince, or are only average players at best anyway e.g. King and Nahas. Spuds is becoming a term way too commonly used to describe average to ok AFL players these days.lol wut?
It might have been a team of spuds, but they were still AFL listed spuds. Under AFL rules they would have won by 40 goals.
But in the context of an Australian representative team it was beyond shithouse.None of them are spuds at AFL level, they are all decent players. However, they are either still too young, or just below the top echelon of players e.g. Kelly and Vince, or are only average players at best anyway e.g. King and Nahas. Spuds is becoming a term way too commonly used to describe average to ok AFL players these days.
The logic being if I'm a youngster sitting at home in Dublin watching a bunch of supposed AFL professionals goosestepping their way around the field, I'd feel quite satisfied in sticking with my game as a fan and player, with no inclination to explore the code whose representatives are getting beaten by the equivalent of 15 goals. It was a bad advertisement, no two ways about it.What's your logic.
A big win by the Irish encourages them to play AR because they'll be good at it or a big win discourages the Irish to play AR because the Aussies are crap at IR ?
none of them are spuds at afl level, they are all decent players. However, they are either still too young, or just below the top echelon of players e.g. Kelly and vince, or are only average players at best anyway e.g. King and nahas. Spuds is becoming a term way too commonly used to describe average to ok afl players these days.
lol!!!
If the AFL is still keen to have some format of representative football then I say lets have something that both players and fans will enjoy and be engaged with. I'm talking about State of Origin footy. BRING IT BACK!!
It's quite baffling that after all these years, a lot of aussie rules fans still seem to think international rules and gaelic football are the same.
There's a great website called www.youtube.com that has footage from all sorts of bizarre and obscure sports from around the world.
Sit down for 5 minutes and watch some clips of gaelic football.
For those who think you'd give us a game in gaelic football, imagine how different aussie rules would be tactically if play didn't stop for a mark and you couldn't tackle players to the ground.
Those two rules massively affect the game dynamics and how you attack and defend.
There's a very good reason the Australians dominated back in the mid-20th century when IR was played under all-Gaelic rules (save for dribbling). If you couldn't stop for a mark, the game would be in perpetual movement and their superior fitness and capacity to push up the ground would come to the fore, and this would be highlighted even further if tackling was omitted. With the amount of ground AFL players cover these days, on massive grounds, the amount of training they do, there's no way the Irish could compete as well. The ONLY change there that wouldn't advantage Australia is the dribbling style. It is the only thing that legitimately doesn't translate. The tackling is no longer much of an issue, because the degree to which it can be used has been scaled back to the point that the Australians employ little to no physicality.
International Rules, for all intents and purposes (in terms of the things that make it tough for one side or the other to adapt) heavily, heavily favours Gaelic football. Several of the changes added to make it "more" like Aussie rules actually make it easier for the Irish - like bouncing the round ball. A hell of a lot easier than chipping back to oneself, regardless of who you are. Anyone can bounce a round ball. A shitload easier than having to bounce an oblong ball. It doesn't close any gap, because it doesn't present a foreign skill to either side.
Personally I don't have a problem with this - the game should favour the Irish, or else the series doesn't work in the modern era. But it's delusional to try to say the game isn't a hell of a lot closer to Gaelic than it is to footy. EVERY SKILL IN GAELIC that could potentially disadvantage the Australian side is present, bar the dribbling style. The ball is round, which hands about a thousand advantages to the Irish in nearly every facet of the game (field kicking, judging the flight of the ball, the ability to score) the field of play is tiny, the scoring area is the same as in Gaelic, there are goalkeepers (not a single player in the AFL has any idea how to play anything resembling this role, which opens up an enormous scoring area for the Irish), there's a cap on handballing so the bread and butter ball movement style employed by every AFL player is not usable. It's not a wonder they run around like headless chooks before turning the ball over, the cornerstone of their game results in a free to the opposition.
The only problem is, as much as these leanings need to be present to make the game feasible, they also make it farcical. It's an awkward hybrid that can't ever really present an equitable set of rules, end of the day.