• Please read this post on the rules on BigFooty regarding posting copyright material, including fair dealing rules. Repeat infringements could see your account limited or closed.

Investigation into Essendon Fitness Program

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, if they signed the consent form, i'm going to go right ahead and assume they used AOD. SO probably most of the list, but we don't know for sure.

But you're the Essendon fan. You should be able to tell us the players that got big over the off season, surely? Or maybe, just maybe, this is another of your ridiculous deflections? Honestly, there were posts proudly made on BF by Essendon fans about how big the players got over that off-season. You know this. We know this. Your pathetic demands someone else do the leg work to prove what we already know are pretty tiresome. Get some new material.

In the words of the revered and benevolent Kyle Reimers " Everyone signed it, it was a personal choice as to whether they took it"
 
In the words of the revered and benevolent Kyle Reimers " Everyone signed it, it was a personal choice as to whether they took it"
Right, but signing shows intent. Intent to take a banned substance. They'll need to prove they didn't take it, not the other way around.
 
In the words of the revered and benevolent Kyle Reimers " Everyone signed it, it was a personal choice as to whether they took it"
So now you are going to believe something Reimers has said. When he spoke out previously he was ridiculed. Just believe the parts that support Essendon.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So now you are going to believe something Reimers has said. When he spoke out previously he was ridiculed. Just believe the parts that support Essendon.

I don't really know what to believe. I think my post and your response highlights the way everyone on BF is approaching the situation. It's all about cherry picking to support your own agenda, I've seen posts painting Reimers as a straight down the line honest bloke who's been smashed for simply telling it like it is.
 
In the words of the revered and benevolent Kyle Reimers " Everyone signed it, it was a personal choice as to whether they took it"

Then everyone should have rung WADA/ASADA eh?
 

You don't get it.
They are footy players , not university graduates, not chemists. Essendon have betrayed the trust of their players in a massive way. Does the AFLPA now have to provide experts to advise every player whether they should take the stuff the club is telling them they should take.
 
Surely you don't believe this? Lets hope you have a dry sense of humor and not the mental capacity of a 4 year old screaming "it's not fair" just because your club screwed up their rebuild.
Lol we stuffed up our rebuild?
Your club's about to be catapulted into the stone ages.
I'll take option A thanks.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Certainly their sports science department needed far tighter controlling measures. Thankfully the club have been assured by 2 pharmacologists that the supplements given were safe and not performance enhancing.
Hahaha gotta love how you choose to believe what suits you and block everything else. A true Essendonian.

Are these 2 pharmacologists you speak of employed by ASADA? Cause I don't think they can, you know, make that decision.
 
The loophole has been closed.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/tea...ssendons-defence/story-e6frf9l6-1226638953414

What is the next tactic from Essendon? I bet it's not telling the truth.

23559241.jpg
 
The loophole has been closed.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/tea...ssendons-defence/story-e6frf9l6-1226638953414

What is the next tactic from Essendon? I bet it's not telling the truth.


But mxett said the two pharmacologists employed by essendon had assured them they would be fine

Sorry I forgot - they just plucked this AOD out of thin air, popped it on the consent form but no player received it. Apologies for the false assumption - I'm sure the pharmacologists employed by the bombers are correct and that all the supplements are above board.
 
You don't get it.
They are footy players , not university graduates, not chemists. Essendon have betrayed the trust of their players in a massive way. Does the AFLPA now have to provide experts to advise every player whether they should take the stuff the club is telling them they should take.

Some Essendon players opted out of the program
 
The loophole has been closed.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/tea...ssendons-defence/story-e6frf9l6-1226638953414

What is the next tactic from Essendon? I bet it's not telling the truth.

Come on, Richard. Everything EFC says is spin, everything ASADA/WADA says is set in stone truth? They're struggling and trying to smoke the boys out. They can't very well come out and admit defeat before they've even conducted interviews, it's a last ditch effort. Hirdy and Evans have said it'll be squared away nicely in 4-6 weeks, when Hirdy speaks you should listen.
 
But mxett said the two pharmacologists employed by essendon had assured them they would be fine

Sorry I forgot - they just plucked this AOD out of thin air, popped it on the consent form but no player received it. Apologies for the false assumption - I'm sure the pharmacologists employed by the bombers are correct and that all the supplements are above board.
Knowing how professional Essendon are these days, it was probably a couple of cashiers from the Moonee Ponds Chemist Warehouse.
 
Certainly their sports science department needed far tighter controlling measures. Thankfully the club have been assured by 2 pharmacologists that the supplements given were safe and not performance enhancing.

We have a sports scientist he has a doctorate in Exercise Physiology. What exactly were EFC intending when they hired a Biochemist doing a phd in Pharmacology. Assuring safety after the fact, tighter control measures pfft, I think the whole think went to plan, until they got caught that is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top