The only reason Ottens wasn't consistent was because of injury. Doesn't automatocally eliminate him from being better or not. Cloke is inconsistent and yet his best is better than nearly every CHF in the league.
Dean coxs best is still better than Ottens best so what's your point? Ottens played enough games with no impact when he was fit, just because he turned it once or twice when needed doesnt mean he's an all timer. Would be behind Cox, Sandi, lade, primus in the last decade alone.