It's Your Call Symonds or MacGill?

[pete_hawker]

Most believe as I do that Hodge is a certainty, so who takes the other spot, Symonds or suke a lot MacGill. It's obvious who I think.

 

[Greg Miller= Messiah]

Most believe as I do that Hodge is a certainty, so who takes the other spot, Symonds or suke a lot MacGill. It's obvious who I think.

Macgill should take it in hobart and Sydney.
Or they could go with Aiden Blizzard for the extra batsman.

 

[petmax]

Symonds to get the spot, MacGill is the biggest tosser and does not offer anything but his bowling.

 

[crows dude]

Symonds to get the spot, MacGill is the biggest tosser and does not offer anything but his bowling.

and Symonds offers nothing but his fielding

 

[eddiesmith]

Umm, Bracken aint safe either

 

[DIG]

Umm, Bracken aint safe either

yeah, going by Ponting's latest comments Bracken could be the most likely to miss.

 

[crazy_big_al]

both are good

andy will get the go i think

 

[pete_hawker]

yeah, going by Ponting's latest comments Bracken could be the most likely to miss.

yeah heard him say it shortly after i posted it, good to see Roy in, shame we have to deal with MacGill for another test, but i don't like bracken either, bring in a good non NSW bowler please!!!!!!

 

[Cooldude]

The question is what the hell's Symonds for?

His fifth bowling option is handy but more of less surplus to requirements, really don't need him. It was a waste of time to have him on bowling all those overs when we could've brought Macgill on earlier

Then if he adds nothing to the current bowling attack (And he doesn't), we might as well have played a proper batsman or Bracken. Let's face it, there are better batsman around than Roy if we're picking a pure bat

 

[Squizza]

Well ATM he's a better batting and bowling option than Watson